WHAT'S WRONG WITH SCIENCE ? : Modeling the collective discovery processes with the Nobel Game

Abstract : There is an increasing pressure on scholars to publish to further or sustain a career in academia. Governments and funding agencies are greedy of indicators based on scientific production to measure science output. But what exactly do we know about the relation between publication levels and advances in science ? How do social dynamics and norms interfere with the quality of the scientific production ? Are there different regimes of scientific dynamics ? The present study proposes some concepts to think about scientific dynamics, through the modeling of the relation between science policies and scholars' exploration-exploitation dilemmas. Passing, we analyze in detail the effects of the " publish or perish " policy, that turns out to have no significant effects in the developments of emerging scientific fields, while having detrimental impacts on the quality of the production of mature fields.
Liste complète des métadonnées

https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01354988
Contributeur : David Chavalarias <>
Soumis le : mardi 23 août 2016 - 09:14:17
Dernière modification le : samedi 18 février 2017 - 01:20:15
Document(s) archivé(s) le : jeudi 24 novembre 2016 - 12:36:03

Licence


Copyright (Tous droits réservés)

Identifiants

  • HAL Id : hal-01354988, version 1

Citation

David Chavalarias. WHAT'S WRONG WITH SCIENCE ? : Modeling the collective discovery processes with the Nobel Game. 2016. <hal-01354988>

Partager

Métriques

Consultations de
la notice

391

Téléchargements du document

330