Editorial information
Résumé
The proceedings which the reader just opens is a
shared product of many people, beginning with
the authors of plenaries and papers from Thematic
Working Groups (TWGs), the TWG leaders, and ending
with the two editors.
So far, the process of editing CERME proceedings has
not been openly discussed and the editors of previous
proceedings approached the task differently. In
order to take a step forward, we decided to describe
the process here in a more detailed way, in particular
highlighting innovations. This might allow the new
editors for CERME10 to follow in our steps and improve
the process further.
The work on the proceedings of CERME9 started
immediately after the conference itself in February
2015. Already some weeks before CERME9, all TWGs
presentations as well as abstracts of all plenary presentations
had been available on the conference website
as a kind of pre-conference proceedings. Then,
the authors of TWG contributions were advised to
elaborate their papers in order to meet the standard
of proceedings papers of CERME, in particular, taking
into account feedback they received during CERME9.
In the next stage, the TWG leaders evaluated all the
papers and posters and negotiated any necessary
changes with the authors. This stage ended by sending
the papers as complete bundles to the two editors,
including letters of consent that the papers can be
published in the Hall database (see below).
Origine : Fichiers éditeurs autorisés sur une archive ouverte