The evolution of emissions trading in the E.U: Tensions between national trading schemes and the proposed E.U. directive

Philippe Quirion (1) , Catherine Boemare (1) , Steven Sorrell (2)

1 CIRED - centre international de recherche sur l'environnement et le développement
2 SPRU - Science and Technology Policy Research

The EU is pioneering the development of greenhouse gas emissions trading, but there is a tension between the ‘top-down' and ‘bottom-up' evolution of trading schemes. While the Commission is introducing a European emissions trading scheme (EU ETS) in 2005, several member states have already introduced negotiated agreements that include trading arrangements. Typically, these national schemes have a wider scope than the proposed EU directive and allow firms to use relative rather than absolute targets. The coexistence of ‘top-down' and ‘bottom-up' trading schemes may create some complex problems of policy interaction. This paper explores the potential interactions between the EU ETS and the negotiated agreements in France and UK and uses these to illustrate some important generic issues. The paper first describes the proposed EU directive, outlines the UK and French policies and compares their main features to the EU ETS. It then discusses how the national and European policies may interact in practice. Four issues are highlighted, namely, double regulation, double counting of emission reductions, equivalence of effort and linking trading schemes. The paper concludes with some recommendations for the future development of UK and French climate policy.

Domaines: Economies et finances

Philippe Quirion, Catherine Boemare, Steven Sorrell. The evolution of emissions trading in the E.U: Tensions between national trading schemes and the proposed E.U. directive. Climate Policy, 2003, 3S2, pp.S105-S124. ⟨hal-00119455⟩