Are equality of opportunity and equality of outcome substitutable? Individual based evidence

Abstract : According to some political economists, equality of outcome and equality of opportunity are substitutable. Assuming that people wish to equalize their opportunities in life, their level of demand for equalizing outcomes depends on their perception of social mobility in their society. On the other hand, substitutability can be criticized because equalizing opportunities introduces higher risk for an individual's future rank in their society, and this causes yet more demand for equalizing outcomes. Evidence based on the French Survey "Dynegal" shows that both expectations are correct and that the relationship between perceived equality of opportunity and preference for equality of outcomes is robustly U-shaped.
Type de document :
Pré-publication, Document de travail
2013
Liste complète des métadonnées

Littérature citée [29 références]  Voir  Masquer  Télécharger

https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00911325
Contributeur : Sciencespo Grenoble Centre de Documentation <>
Soumis le : vendredi 29 novembre 2013 - 10:36:51
Dernière modification le : vendredi 29 novembre 2013 - 10:51:31
Document(s) archivé(s) le : lundi 3 mars 2014 - 19:25:18

Fichier

SPGWP_N1.pdf
Fichiers produits par l'(les) auteur(s)

Identifiants

  • HAL Id : halshs-00911325, version 1

Collections

Citation

Raul Magni Berton. Are equality of opportunity and equality of outcome substitutable? Individual based evidence. 2013. 〈halshs-00911325〉

Partager

Métriques

Consultations de
la notice

243

Téléchargements du document

200