Skip to Main content Skip to Navigation
Journal articles

General or Idiosyncratic Item Effects: What Is the Good Target for Models?

Abstract : Recently, Adelman, Marquis, Sabatos-DeVito, and Estes (2013) formulated severe criticisms about approaches based on averaging item response times (RTs) over participants and associated methods for estimating the amount of item variance that models should try to account for. Their main argument was that item effects include stable idiosyncratic effects. In this comment, we provide supplementary empirical evidence that this assertion is indeed valid. However, the actual implications of this result are not those defended in Adelman et al. (2013), where there seems to be confusion about the precision of measures and the nature of target effects. Indeed, basic statistical considerations show that any arbitrary data precision level can be achieved in all cases using an appropriate number of observations per item, whereas general and idiosyncratic item effects are both targets of interest for modeling but in different objectives.
Document type :
Journal articles
Complete list of metadata

Cited literature [17 references]  Display  Hide  Download
Contributor : Pierre Courrieu Connect in order to contact the contributor
Submitted on : Friday, January 17, 2020 - 4:59:59 PM
Last modification on : Tuesday, October 19, 2021 - 10:58:56 PM
Long-term archiving on: : Saturday, April 18, 2020 - 12:47:51 PM


Files produced by the author(s)




Pierre Courrieu, Arnaud Rey. General or Idiosyncratic Item Effects: What Is the Good Target for Models?. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, American Psychological Association, 2015, 41 (5), pp.1597-1601. ⟨10.1037/xlm0000062⟩. ⟨hal-02438489⟩



Les métriques sont temporairement indisponibles