Skip to Main content Skip to Navigation
Conference papers

Aligning Discourse and Argumentation Structures using Subtrees and Redescription Mining

Laurine Huber 1 Yannick Toussaint 2 Charlotte Roze 1 Mathilde Dargnat 3 Chloé Braud 1
1 SYNALP - Natural Language Processing : representations, inference and semantics
LORIA - NLPKD - Department of Natural Language Processing & Knowledge Discovery
2 ORPAILLEUR - Knowledge representation, reasonning
Inria Nancy - Grand Est, LORIA - NLPKD - Department of Natural Language Processing & Knowledge Discovery
Abstract : In this paper, we investigate similarities between discourse and argumentation structures by aligning subtrees in a corpus containing both annotations. Contrary to previous works, we focus on comparing sub-structures and not only relation matches. Using data mining techniques , we show that discourse and argumen-tation most often align well, and the double annotation allows to derive a mapping between structures. Moreover, this approach enables the study of similarities between discourse structures and differences in their expressive power.
Complete list of metadatas

Cited literature [17 references]  Display  Hide  Download

https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02165048
Contributor : Laurine Huber <>
Submitted on : Tuesday, June 25, 2019 - 3:30:59 PM
Last modification on : Sunday, October 25, 2020 - 7:08:03 PM

File

ArgMining_final.pdf
Files produced by the author(s)

Identifiers

  • HAL Id : hal-02165048, version 1

Citation

Laurine Huber, Yannick Toussaint, Charlotte Roze, Mathilde Dargnat, Chloé Braud. Aligning Discourse and Argumentation Structures using Subtrees and Redescription Mining. 6th International Workshop on Argument Mining, Aug 2019, Florence, Italy. ⟨hal-02165048⟩

Share

Metrics

Record views

144

Files downloads

175