Should the Neoclassical growth model include the saving flow in the Utility function? - Archive ouverte HAL Accéder directement au contenu
Article Dans Une Revue International Journal of Economics and Finance Année : 2016

Should the Neoclassical growth model include the saving flow in the Utility function?

Résumé

By assuming that the individual derives utility from consumption only, the resulting optimal decision to save in the Ramsey model depends on the rate of return, given a certain time preference. If therefore the production function is such that this rate of return remains relatively low, the individual reacts unconsciously by refusing to save despite the capital depreciates and the household grows. We argue that it is conceptually necessary in that framework to assume a direct preference for saving (or for thriftiness) in the utility function, not only to make the individual behave as a real human being who cares about the survival of the household, but also to account reasonably for any other motives to save or accumulate than the rate of return. We show it generalizes the model in a way to recover static properties of the exogenous Solow version and to extend results of capitalist spirit models following Zou (1994).
Fichier principal
Vignette du fichier
MPRA paper.pdf (834.92 Ko) Télécharger le fichier
Origine : Fichiers produits par l'(les) auteur(s)

Dates et versions

hal-01406690 , version 1 (01-12-2016)

Identifiants

Citer

Atef Khelifi. Should the Neoclassical growth model include the saving flow in the Utility function?. International Journal of Economics and Finance, 2016, 8 (12), ⟨10.5539/ijef.v8n12p224⟩. ⟨hal-01406690⟩

Collections

CNRS UNIV-LILLE
65 Consultations
123 Téléchargements

Altmetric

Partager

Gmail Facebook X LinkedIn More