Skip to Main content Skip to Navigation
Book sections

The psychiatrization of the opponent in polemical context

Abstract : A variant of the ad hominem argument amounts to challenging the opponent’s mental health. Semi-technical designations borrowed from psychiatric paradigms (such as autistic, paranoiac, hysterical) are thus appealed to in order to qualify the opponent. Based on three examples from polemical discussions on political issues, we investigate what kind of behaviour triggers such accusations, how they are justified, and how they are handled by the speaker to whom they are addressed.
Document type :
Book sections
Complete list of metadata

Cited literature [13 references]  Display  Hide  Download

https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01388752
Contributor : Christine Okret-Manville <>
Submitted on : Thursday, October 27, 2016 - 2:59:54 PM
Last modification on : Wednesday, September 23, 2020 - 4:28:58 AM

File

art_Doury_Mansier_ThePsychiatr...
Files produced by the author(s)

Identifiers

Citation

Marianne Doury, Pascale Mansier. The psychiatrization of the opponent in polemical context. Scrutinizing Argumentation in Practice, pp.217-232, 2015, ⟨10.1075/aic.9.12dou⟩. ⟨hal-01388752⟩

Share

Metrics

Record views

129

Files downloads

379