Exempla docent. How to Make Sense of Aristotle’s Examples of the Fallacy of Accident (Doxography Matters)

Abstract : Scholarly dissatisfaction with Aristotle’s fallacy of accident has traditionally focused on his examples, whose compatibility with the fallacy’s definition has been doubted time and again. Besides a unified account of the fallacy of accident itself, the paper provides a formalized analysis of its several examples in Aristotle’s Sophistici elenchi. The most problematic instances are dealt with by means of an internal reconstruction of their features as conveyed by Aristotle’s text and an extensive survey of their interpretation in the Byzantine and Latin exegetical tradition. Carefully handled a doxographical approach, as opposed to rapid results oriented practices, proves to be most effective in that it supplies both useful albeit ordinarily overlooked insights and a comprehensive framework of reference for further investigations.
Type de document :
Article dans une revue
Liste complète des métadonnées

https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01254531
Contributeur : Leone Gazziero <>
Soumis le : mardi 12 janvier 2016 - 13:40:21
Dernière modification le : mardi 3 juillet 2018 - 11:43:29

Identifiants

  • HAL Id : hal-01254531, version 1

Collections

Citation

Leone Gazziero. Exempla docent. How to Make Sense of Aristotle’s Examples of the Fallacy of Accident (Doxography Matters). Acta philosophica, 2015, 〈http://www.actaphilosophica.it/it/issue-2015-2〉. 〈hal-01254531〉

Partager

Métriques

Consultations de la notice

134