Exempla docent. How to Make Sense of Aristotle’s Examples of the Fallacy of Accident (Doxography Matters)

Abstract : Scholarly dissatisfaction with Aristotle’s fallacy of accident has traditionally focused on his examples, whose compatibility with the fallacy’s definition has been doubted time and again. Besides a unified account of the fallacy of accident itself, the paper provides a formalized analysis of its several examples in Aristotle’s Sophistici elenchi. The most problematic instances are dealt with by means of an internal reconstruction of their features as conveyed by Aristotle’s text and an extensive survey of their interpretation in the Byzantine and Latin exegetical tradition. Carefully handled a doxographical approach, as opposed to rapid results oriented practices, proves to be most effective in that it supplies both useful albeit ordinarily overlooked insights and a comprehensive framework of reference for further investigations.
Document type :
Journal articles
Liste complète des métadonnées

https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01254531
Contributor : Leone Gazziero <>
Submitted on : Tuesday, January 12, 2016 - 1:40:21 PM
Last modification on : Tuesday, July 3, 2018 - 11:43:29 AM

Identifiers

  • HAL Id : hal-01254531, version 1

Collections

Citation

Leone Gazziero. Exempla docent. How to Make Sense of Aristotle’s Examples of the Fallacy of Accident (Doxography Matters). Acta philosophica, 2015, 〈http://www.actaphilosophica.it/it/issue-2015-2〉. 〈hal-01254531〉

Share

Metrics

Record views

138