A systematic review of the effect of distraction on surgeon performance: directions for operating room policy and surgical training

Helena Mentis 1 Amine Chellali 2 Kelly Manser 3 Caroline G. L. Cao 4 Steven D. Schwaitzberg 3
1 UMBC - University of Maryland [Baltimore County]
2 IBISC - Informatique, Biologie Intégrative et Systèmes Complexes
3 Department of surgery, Cambridge Health Alliance
4 EREL - Ergonomics in Remote Environments Laboratory
Abstract : Background. Distractions during surgical procedures have been linked to medical error and team inefficiency. This systematic review identifies the most common and most significant forms of distraction in order to devise guidelines for mitigating the effects of distractions in the OR. Methods. In January 2015, a PubMed and Google Scholar search yielded 963 articles, of which 17 (2 %) either directly observed the occurrence of distractions in operating rooms or conducted a laboratory experiment to determine the effect of distraction on surgical performance. Results. Observational studies indicated that movement and case-irrelevant conversation were the most frequently occurring distractions, but equipment and procedural distractions were the most severe. Laboratory studies indicated that (1) auditory and mental distractions can significantly impact surgical performance, but visual distractions do not incur the same level of effects; (2) task difficulty has an interaction effect with distractions; and (3) inexperienced subjects reduce their speed when faced with distractions, while experienced subjects did not. Conclusion. This systematic review suggests that operating room protocols should ensure that distractions from intermittent auditory and mental distractions are significantly reduced. In addition, surgical residents would benefit from training for intermittent auditory and mental distractions in order to develop automaticity and high skill performance during distractions, particularly during more difficult surgical tasks. It is unclear as to whether training should be done in the presence of distractions or distractions should only be used for post-training testing of levels of automaticity.
Keywords : surgery safety performance. Distraction
Document type :
Journal articles
Complete list of metadatas

Cited literature [26 references]  Display  Hide  Download
https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01187233
Contributor : Amine Chellali <>
Submitted on : Wednesday, August 26, 2015 - 12:54:30 PM
Last modification on : Monday, October 28, 2019 - 10:50:21 AM
Long-term archiving on: Friday, November 27, 2015 - 10:59:40 AM

File

SE_Distractions_CR.pdf
Files produced by the author(s)

Identifiers

Collections

IBISC | IBISC-IRA2 | UNIV-PARIS-SACLAY | UNIV-EVRY

Citation

Helena Mentis, Amine Chellali, Kelly Manser, Caroline G. L. Cao, Steven D. Schwaitzberg. A systematic review of the effect of distraction on surgeon performance: directions for operating room policy and surgical training. Surgical Endoscopy, Springer Verlag (Germany), 2016, 30 (5), pp.1713--1724. ⟨10.1007/s00464-015-4443-z⟩. ⟨hal-01187233⟩

Export

BibTeX TEI DC DCterms EndNote

Share

Metrics

Record views

266

Files downloads

456

Contact

Informations

CCSD