HAL will be down for maintenance from Friday, June 10 at 4pm through Monday, June 13 at 9am. More information
Skip to Main content Skip to Navigation
Journal articles

Statistical reasoning with set-valued information : Ontic vs. epistemic views

Abstract : In information processing tasks, sets may have a conjunctive or a disjunctive reading. In the conjunctive reading, a set represents an object of interest and its elements are subparts of the object, forming a composite description. In the disjunctive reading, a set contains mutually exclusive elements and refers to the representation of incomplete knowledge. It does not model an actual object or quantity, but partial information about an underlying object or a precise quantity. This distinction between what we call ontic vs. epistemic sets remains valid for fuzzy sets, whose membership functions, in the disjunctive reading are possibility distributions, over deterministic or random values. This paper examines the impact of this distinction in statistics. We show its importance because there is a risk of misusing basic notions and tools, such as conditioning, distance between sets, variance, regression, etc. when data are set-valued. We discuss several examples where the ontic and epistemic points of view yield different approaches to these concepts.
Complete list of metadata

Cited literature [70 references]  Display  Hide  Download

Contributor : Open Archive Toulouse Archive Ouverte (oatao) Connect in order to contact the contributor
Submitted on : Wednesday, May 20, 2015 - 2:59:09 PM
Last modification on : Tuesday, May 10, 2022 - 3:51:34 AM
Long-term archiving on: : Tuesday, September 15, 2015 - 6:29:51 AM


Files produced by the author(s)



Ines Couso, Didier Dubois. Statistical reasoning with set-valued information : Ontic vs. epistemic views. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, Elsevier, 2014, vol. 55 (n° 7), pp. 1502-1518. ⟨10.1016/j.ijar.2013.07.002⟩. ⟨hal-01153809⟩



Record views


Files downloads