Regulating Multiparty Persuasion with Bipolar Arguments: Discussion and Examples
Résumé
The problem of regulating multiparty persuasion among several (more than two) self-interested agents has recently been put forward in a series of papers. Most of these works are settled in the original Dung's framework of argumentation. In this paper, we discuss informally the challenges that arise when one wants to consider more expressive bipolar argumentation frameworks using a gradual evaluation of arguments. We see in particular that the notion of relevance can be interpreted in different ways, giving rise to different types of protocols. The discussion is illustrated by a number of examples.