Front- vs. back-illuminated CCD cameras for photometric surveys: a noise budget analysis

Nicolas Crouzet (1) , Tristan Guillot (1) , Francois Fressin (2) , Alain Blazit (3)

1 CASSIOPEE - Laboratoire de Cosmologie, Astrophysique Stellaire & Solaire, de Planétologie et de Mécanique des Fluides
2 LG - Laboratoire Gemini
3 FIZEAU - Laboratoire Hippolyte Fizeau

Exoplanetary transit and stellar oscillation surveys require a very high precision photometry. The instrumental noise has therefore to be minimized. First, we perform a semi-analytical model of different noise sources. We show that the noise due the CCD electrodes can be overcome using a Gaussian PSF (Point Spread Function) of full width half maximum larger than 1.6 pixels. We also find that for a PSF size of a few pixels, the photometric aperture has to be at least 2.5 times larger than the PSF full width half maximum. Then, we compare a front- with a back-illuminated CCD through a Monte-Carlo simulation. Both cameras give the same results for a PSF full width half maximum larger than 1.5 pixels. All these simulations are applied to the A STEP (Antarctica Search for Transiting Extrasolar Planets) project. As a result, we choose a front-illuminated camera for A STEP because of its better resolution and lower price, and we will use a PSF larger than 1.6 pixels.

Domaines: Cosmologie et astrophysique extra-galactique [astro-ph.CO]; Astrophysique [astro-ph]; Instrumentations et Détecteurs [physics.ins-det]

Nicolas Crouzet, Tristan Guillot, Francois Fressin, Alain Blazit. Front- vs. back-illuminated CCD cameras for photometric surveys: a noise budget analysis. Astronomical Notes / Astronomische Nachrichten, 2007, 328 (8), pp.805 - 808. ⟨hal-00324016⟩