Skip to Main content Skip to Navigation
New interface
Conference papers

Steal-on-Abort: Improving Transactional Memory Performance through Dynamic Transaction Reordering

Abstract : In transactional memory, aborted transactions reduce performance, and waste computing resources. Ideally, concurrent execution of transactions should be optimally ordered to minimise aborts, but such an ordering is often either complex, or unfeasible, to obtain. This paper introduces a new technique called steal-on-abort, which aims to improve transaction ordering at runtime. Suppose transactions A and B conflict, and B is aborted. In general it is difficult to predict this first conflict, but once observed, it is logical not to execute the two transactions concurrently again. In steal-on-abort, the aborted transaction B is stolen by its opponent transaction A, and queued behind A to prevent concurrent execution of A and B. Without steal-on-abort, transaction B would typically have been restarted immediately, and possibly had a repeat conflict with transaction A. Steal-on-abort requires no application-specific information, modification, or offline pre-processing. In this paper, it is evaluated using a sorted linked list, red-black tree, STAMP-vacation, and Lee-TM. The evaluation reveals steal-on-abort is highly effective at eliminating repeat conflicts, which reduces the amount of computing resources wasted, and significantly improves performance.
Document type :
Conference papers
Complete list of metadata
Contributor : Ist Rennes Connect in order to contact the contributor
Submitted on : Monday, December 7, 2009 - 3:29:03 PM
Last modification on : Wednesday, January 10, 2018 - 6:08:07 PM

Links full text




Mohammad Ansari, Mikel Lujan, Christos Kotselidis, Kim Jarvis, Chris Kirkham, et al.. Steal-on-Abort: Improving Transactional Memory Performance through Dynamic Transaction Reordering. HiPEAC 2009 - High Performance and Embedded Architectures and Compilers, Jan 2009, Paphos, Cyprus. ⟨10.1007/978-3-540-92990-1_3⟩. ⟨inria-00439445⟩



Record views