Les actes de langage indirects sont-ils tous conventionnels ? - Archive ouverte HAL Accéder directement au contenu
Article Dans Une Revue Revue Romane Année : 2012

Les actes de langage indirects sont-ils tous conventionnels ?

Nicolas Ruytenbeek

Résumé

This paper focuses on the variety of ways to communicate a directive illocutionary act in modern French. I argue that every type of directive speech act can be regarded as stemming from a convention, be it a linguistic one, for on-record speech acts, or a discursive one, for off-record speech acts. The various acceptations of the “conventionality” applied to on-record indirect speech acts (ISAs) are reconsidered. More specifically, I claim that the distinction, in terms of politeness, between on-record and off-record ISAs does not coincide with the opposition between conventional and non-conventional speech acts. Second, I show that it is necessary to identify two types of conventions or communicative strategies to perform off-record directives. The first consists in referring to a reason to act; the second is evoking the requested action.

Domaines

Linguistique
Fichier principal
Vignette du fichier
revueromanefinaldraft.pdf (335.3 Ko) Télécharger le fichier
Origine : Fichiers produits par l'(les) auteur(s)

Dates et versions

hal-03123941 , version 1 (09-02-2021)

Identifiants

Citer

Nicolas Ruytenbeek. Les actes de langage indirects sont-ils tous conventionnels ?. Revue Romane, 2012, 47 (2), pp.258-282. ⟨10.1075/rro.47.2.03ruy⟩. ⟨hal-03123941⟩
20 Consultations
2373 Téléchargements

Altmetric

Partager

Gmail Facebook X LinkedIn More