An instrumental and relational explanation of witness reactions to interactional injustice in the workplace: The case of inter-peer derogation

Abstract : Research on organizational injustice has recently begun to endeavor to understand the conditions in which a witness who is not directly affected by such a situation can be encouraged to react. This article contributes to this emerging and mainly theoretical literature by empirically testing the influence of three witness characteristics: one instrumental (just world belief), one moral (cynical hostility), and one relational (personal experience of injustice). Using a synthesis of the three theoretical explanations currently available and an experiment involving 223 employees and how they attribute responsibility for an act of denigration in the workplace, we reveal the intra-psychic and inter-group conditions in which the predisposition of the witness to offer help to the person responsible for the act, if needed, is weak. The findings alert managers to the dangers for the smooth running of the organization of allowing a climate of denigration to develop. They also develop current theoretical knowledge of witnesses' attitudinal reactions to interactional injustice in the workplace.
Document type :
Journal articles
Liste complète des métadonnées

https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01884082
Contributor : Franck Biétry <>
Submitted on : Wednesday, January 9, 2019 - 4:23:39 PM
Last modification on : Friday, March 15, 2019 - 3:36:28 PM

File

154704682481884.pdf
Files produced by the author(s)

Identifiers

  • HAL Id : hal-01884082, version 1

Citation

Franck Biétry, Jordane Creusier. An instrumental and relational explanation of witness reactions to interactional injustice in the workplace: The case of inter-peer derogation. M@n@gement, AIMS (Association internationale de management stratégique), inPress, 21 (3), pp.967-993. ⟨hal-01884082⟩

Share

Metrics

Record views

54

Files downloads

29