Comparison of methods used in European National Forest Inventories for the estimation of volume increment: towards harmonisation - Archive ouverte HAL Accéder directement au contenu
Article Dans Une Revue Annals of Forest Science Année : 2016

Comparison of methods used in European National Forest Inventories for the estimation of volume increment: towards harmonisation

Thomas Gschwantner
  • Fonction : Auteur correspondant
  • PersonId : 1009698

Connectez-vous pour contacter l'auteur
Adrian Lanz
  • Fonction : Auteur
Claude Vidal
  • Fonction : Auteur correspondant
  • PersonId : 1009664

Connectez-vous pour contacter l'auteur
Michal Bosela
  • Fonction : Auteur
Lucio Di Cosmo
  • Fonction : Auteur
Jonas Fridman
  • Fonction : Auteur
Patrizia Gasparini
  • Fonction : Auteur
Andrius Kuliešis
  • Fonction : Auteur
Stein Tomter
  • Fonction : Auteur
Klemens Schadauer
  • Fonction : Auteur

Résumé

AbstractKey messageThe increment estimation methods of European NFIs were explored by means of 12 essential NFI features. The results indicate various differences among NFIs within the commonly acknowledged methodological frame. The perspectives for harmonisation at the European level are promising.ContextThe estimation of increment is implemented differently in European National Forest Inventories (NFIs) due to different historical origins of NFIs and sampling designs and field assessments accommodated to country-specific conditions. The aspired harmonisation of increment estimation requires a comparison and an analysis of NFI methods.AimsThe objective was to investigate the differences in volume increment estimation methods used in European NFIs. The conducted work shall set a basis for harmonisation at the European level which is needed to improve information on forest resources for various strategic processes. MethodsA comprehensive enquiry was conducted during Cost Action FP1001 to explore the methods of increment estimation of 29 European NFIs. The enquiry built upon the preceding Cost Action E43 and was complemented by an analysis of literature to demonstrate the methodological backgrounds. ResultsThe comparison of methods revealed differences concerning the NFI features such as sampling grids, periodicity of assessments, permanent and temporary plots, use of remote sensing, sample tree selection, components of forest growth, forest area changes, sampling thresholds, field measurements, drain assessment, involved models and tree parts included in estimates. ConclusionIncrement estimation methods differ considerably among European NFIs. Their harmonisation introduces new issues into the harmonisation process. Recent accomplishments and the increased use of sample-based inventories in Europe make perspectives for harmonised reporting of increment estimation promising.
Fichier principal
Vignette du fichier
13595_2016_Article_554.pdf (2.19 Mo) Télécharger le fichier
Origine : Publication financée par une institution
Loading...

Dates et versions

hal-01532467 , version 1 (02-06-2017)

Identifiants

Citer

Thomas Gschwantner, Adrian Lanz, Claude Vidal, Michal Bosela, Lucio Di Cosmo, et al.. Comparison of methods used in European National Forest Inventories for the estimation of volume increment: towards harmonisation. Annals of Forest Science, 2016, 73 (4), pp.807-821. ⟨10.1007/s13595-016-0554-5⟩. ⟨hal-01532467⟩
60 Consultations
682 Téléchargements

Altmetric

Partager

Gmail Facebook X LinkedIn More