Action research in natural resource management

J. Jiggins , N. Roling

This chapter departs {rom the assumption that action research has become an established methodology for interactive learning and the management ofcomplex processes ofchange. lt tries to go further by systematically contrasting two paradigms, positivism and constructivism. Theoretically, these paradigms are each highly internally consistent across different levels ofdiscourse, such as epîstemology, theory, and methodology. In practice, we live in an era ofparadigm change and confusion. The chapter contrasts the two paradigms in an attempt to resolue the confusion and provide clarity. lt focuses especially on the second paradigm, because it seems to provide the essential understanding for managing the change required for sustainable development. This change is not brought about only by technology and market forces, but necessarily requires facilitation of collective learning and negotiated agreement. Action research is a key methodology for managing chang"e in the second paradigm. The chapter not only elaborates this paradigm, but also pragmatically tries to draw the implications for management.

Mots clés: positivism; constructivism; management of change; sustainable development; positivisme; constructivisme; gestion du changement; développement durable

Domaines: Sciences agricoles

J. Jiggins, N. Roling. Action research in natural resource management: Marginal in the first paradigm, core in the second. Études et Recherches sur les Systèmes Agraires et le Développement, 1997, pp.151-167. ⟨hal-01231606⟩