Étude comparée de quatre logiciels de gestion de références bibliographiques libres ou gratuits

Abstract : This article is the result of the analysis of various bibliographic reference management tools, especially those that are free. The use of editorial tools by bibliographic editors has evolved rapidly since 2007. But, until recently, free software has fallen short when it comes to ergonomics or use. The functional and technical panorama offered by free software is the result of the comparison of JabRef, Mendeley Desktop, BibDesk and Zotero software undertaken in January 2012 by two research professors affiliated with the Institut national français des techniques de la documentation (INTD).
keyword : LIS
Document type :
Journal articles
Documentation et Bibliotheques, Asted Inc., 2012, 58 (4), pp.187-197


https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00768168
Contributor : Gérald Kembellec <>
Submitted on : Thursday, December 20, 2012 - 9:04:38 PM
Last modification on : Tuesday, February 3, 2015 - 4:05:41 PM

Files

ASTED_Preprint.pdf
fileSource_public_author

Identifiers

  • HAL Id : hal-00768168, version 1
  • ARXIV : 1212.5442

Collections

Citation

Gérald Kembellec, Claire Scopsi. Étude comparée de quatre logiciels de gestion de références bibliographiques libres ou gratuits. Documentation et Bibliotheques, Asted Inc., 2012, 58 (4), pp.187-197. <hal-00768168>

Export

Share

Metrics

Consultation de
la notice

1035

Téléchargement du document

878