B. S. Atal, J. J. Chang, M. V. Mathews, and J. W. Tukey, Inversion of articulatory???to???acoustic transformation in the vocal tract by a computer???sorting technique, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol.63, issue.5, pp.1535-1555, 1978.
DOI : 10.1121/1.381848

S. E. Blumstein, On acoustic invariance in speech, Invariance and Variability in Speech Processes, pp.178-193, 1986.

S. E. Blumstein and K. N. Stevens, Acoustic invariance in speech production: Evidence from measurements of the spectral characteristics of stop consonants, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol.66, issue.4, pp.1001-1017, 1979.
DOI : 10.1121/1.383319

G. Fant, Acoustic Theory of Speech Production. he Hague, 1960.

P. F. Ferrari, V. Gallese, G. Rizzolatti, and L. Fogassi, Mirror neurons responding to the observation of ingestive and communicative mouth actions in the monkey ventral premotor cortex, European Journal of Neuroscience, vol.8, issue.8, pp.1703-1714, 2003.
DOI : 10.1046/j.1460-9568.2003.02601.x

C. A. Fowler, Perceptual centers in speech production and speech perception. Perception and Psychophysics, pp.375-388, 1979.

C. A. Fowler, An event approach of the study of speech perception from a directrealist perspective, J. Phonetics, vol.14, pp.3-28, 1986.

C. A. Fowler, Auditory perception is not special: We see the world, we feel the world, we hear the world, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol.89, issue.6, pp.2910-2915, 1991.
DOI : 10.1121/1.400729

C. A. Fowler, Listeners do hear sounds, not tongues, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol.99, issue.3, pp.1730-1741, 1996.
DOI : 10.1121/1.415237

J. J. Gibson, The sense considered as perceptual systems, Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1966.

H. Gomi and M. Kawato, Equilibrium-Point Control Hypothesis Examined by Measured Arm Stiffness During Multijoint Movement, Science, vol.272, issue.5258, pp.117-120, 1996.
DOI : 10.1126/science.272.5258.117

P. L. Gribble, D. J. Ostry, V. Sanguineti, and R. Laboissière, Are complex control signals required for human arm movement, Journal of Neurophysiology, vol.79, pp.1409-1424, 1998.

F. H. Guenther, Speech sound acquisition, coarticulation, and rate effects in a neural network model of speech production., Psychological Review, vol.102, issue.3, pp.594-62, 1995.
DOI : 10.1037/0033-295X.102.3.594

F. H. Guenther, M. Hampson, and D. Johnson, A theoretical investigation of reference frames for the planning of speech movements., Psychological Review, vol.105, issue.4, pp.611-633, 1998.
DOI : 10.1037/0033-295X.105.4.611-633

S. Hawkins, Puzzles and patterns in 50 years of research on speech perception, Proceedings of the Conference "From Sound to Sense" (CDROM) (pp. B-223 ? B246), 2004.

J. A. Jones and K. G. Munhall, Learning to produce speech with an altered vocal tract: The role of auditory feedback, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol.113, issue.1, pp.532-543, 2005.
DOI : 10.1121/1.1529670

M. I. Jordan and D. E. Rumelhart, Forward Models: Supervised Learning with a Distal Teacher, Cognitive Science, vol.17, issue.3, pp.316-354, 1992.
DOI : 10.1207/s15516709cog1603_1

M. Jeannerod, The representing brain: Neural correlates of motor intention and imagery, Behavioral and Brain Sciences, vol.32, issue.02, pp.187-245, 1994.
DOI : 10.1037/0033-295X.88.1.1

M. Kawato, K. Furukawa, and R. Suzuki, A hierarchical neural-network model for control and learning of voluntary movement, Biological Cybernetics, vol.12, issue.3, pp.169-185, 1987.
DOI : 10.1007/BF00364149

P. A. Keating, The window model of coarticulation: articulatory evidence. UCLA Working Papers in Phonetics, pp.3-29, 1988.

R. Laboissière, D. J. Ostry, and A. G. Feldman, The control of multi-muscle systems: human jaw and hyoid movements, Biological Cybernetics, vol.74, issue.4, pp.373-384, 1996.
DOI : 10.1007/BF00194930

A. Liberman, Speech: A special code, 1996.

A. M. Liberman and I. G. Mattingly, The motor theory of speech production revised (Note: The page numbers referenced in the text correspond to the reproduction of the Cognition paper published in Haskins Laboratories Status Report on Speech Research, Cognition, vol.2183, pp.1-36, 1985.

A. M. Liberman and I. G. Mattingly, A specialization for speech perception, Science, vol.243, issue.4890, pp.489-494, 1989.
DOI : 10.1126/science.2643163

A. M. Liberman, F. Cooper, D. Shankweiler, and M. Studdert-kennedy, Perception of the speech code., Psychological Review, vol.74, issue.6, pp.431-461, 1967.
DOI : 10.1037/h0020279

B. Lindblom, Phonetic Invariance and the Adaptive Nature of Speech, Working Models of Human Perception, pp.139-173, 1988.
DOI : 10.1016/B978-0-12-238050-1.50012-3

B. Lindblom, Explaining Phonetic Variation: A Sketch of the H&H Theory, Speech production and speech modeling, pp.403-439, 1990.
DOI : 10.1007/978-94-009-2037-8_16

B. Lindblom, Role of articulation in speech perception: Clues from production, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol.99, issue.3, pp.1683-792, 1996.
DOI : 10.1121/1.414691

H. Loevenbruck and P. Perrier, Motor control information recovering from the dynamics with the EP Hypothesis International Speech Communication Association, Proceedings ofEUROSPEECH'97, pp.2035-2038, 1997.

R. S. Mcgowan and A. Faber, Introduction to papers on speech recognition and perception from an articulatory point of view, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol.99, issue.3, pp.1680-1682, 1996.
DOI : 10.1121/1.414690

H. Mcgurk and J. Macdonald, Hearing lips and seeing voices, Nature, vol.65, issue.5588, pp.746-748, 1976.
DOI : 10.1038/264746a0

J. S. Perkell, D. H. Klatt, and N. J. Hillsdale, Invariance & Variability in speech processes, 1986.

J. Perkell, M. L. Matthies, H. Lane, F. Guenther, R. Wilhelms-tricarico et al., Speech motor control: Acoustic goals, saturation effects, auditory feedback and internal models, Speech Communication, vol.22, issue.2-3, pp.227-250, 1997.
DOI : 10.1016/S0167-6393(97)00026-5

J. S. Perkell, F. H. Guenther, H. Lane, M. L. Matthies, P. Perrier et al., A theory of speech motor control and supporting data from speakers with normal hearing and with profound hearing loss, Journal of Phonetics, vol.28, issue.3, pp.233-272, 2000.
DOI : 10.1006/jpho.2000.0116

P. Perrier, About speech motor control complexity, Speech Production: Models, Phonetic Processes, and Techniques, 2005.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00371045

P. Perrier, Y. Payan, M. Zandipour, and J. Perkell, Influences of tongue biomechanics on speech movements during the production of velar stop consonants: A modeling study, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol.114, issue.3, pp.1582-1599, 2003.
DOI : 10.1121/1.1587737
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00080414

G. Rizzolatti, L. Fogassi, and V. Gallese, Neurophysiological mechanisms underlying the understanding and imitation of action, Nature Reviews Neuroscience, vol.2, issue.9, pp.661-670, 2001.
DOI : 10.1038/35090060

G. Rizzolatti and M. A. Arbib, Language within our grasp, Trends in Neurosciences, vol.21, issue.5, pp.188-194, 1998.
DOI : 10.1016/S0166-2236(98)01260-0
URL : http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.169.2919

G. Rizzolatti and L. Craighero, THE MIRROR-NEURON SYSTEM, Annual Review of Neuroscience, vol.27, issue.1, pp.169-192, 2004.
DOI : 10.1146/annurev.neuro.27.070203.144230

P. N. Sabes and M. I. Jordan, Obstacle avoidance and a perturbation sensitivity model for motor planning, The Journal of Neurosciences, vol.17, issue.18, pp.7119-7128, 1997.

C. Savariaux, P. Perrier, and J. Orliaguet, Compensation strategies for the perturbation of the rounded vowel [u] using a lip tube: A study of the control space in speech production, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol.98, issue.5, pp.2428-2442, 1995.
DOI : 10.1121/1.413277

C. Savariaux, P. Perrier, J. P. Orliaguet, and J. L. Schwartz, Compensation strategies for the perturbation of French [u] using a lip tube. II. Perceptual analysis, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol.106, issue.1, pp.381-393, 1999.
DOI : 10.1121/1.427063

C. H. Shadle, Articulatory-Acoustic Relationships in Fricative Consonants, Speech production and speech modeling, pp.211-240, 1989.
DOI : 10.1007/978-94-009-2037-8_8

J. L. Schwartz, C. Abry, L. J. Boë, and M. Cathiard, Phonology in a theory of perception-for-action-control, Phonology: from Phonetics to Cognition, pp.255-280, 2002.

R. Sock, La théorie de la viabilité en production-perception de la parole, Percevoir : monde et langage, pp.285-316, 2001.

J. Soechting and F. Lacquaniti, Invariant characteristics of a pointing movement in man, The Journal of Neurosciences, vol.1, pp.710-720, 1981.

R. H. Stetson, Motor Phonetics: a study of speech movements in action Archives néerlandaises de phonétique expérimentale, pp.1-216, 1928.
DOI : 10.1007/978-94-015-3356-0

K. N. Stevens, The quantal nature of speech: Evidence from articulatory-acoustic data, Human Communication: A unified view, pp.51-66, 1972.

K. N. Stevens, Acoustic Phonetics, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol.109, issue.1, 1998.
DOI : 10.1121/1.1327577

K. N. Stevens and S. E. Blumstein, Invariant cues for place of articulation in stop consonants, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol.64, issue.5, pp.1358-1368, 1978.
DOI : 10.1121/1.382102

K. N. Stevens, On the quantal nature of speech, J. Phonetics, vol.17, pp.3-45, 1989.

K. N. Stevens, Critique: Articulatory???acoustic relations and their role in speech perception, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol.99, issue.3, pp.1693-1694, 1996.
DOI : 10.1121/1.414692

S. Tremblay, D. M. Shiller, and D. J. Ostry, Somatosensory basis of speech production, Nature, vol.423, issue.6942, pp.866-869, 2003.
DOI : 10.1038/nature01710

D. M. Wolpert, Z. Ghahramani, and M. I. Jordan, Are arm trajectories planned in kinematic or dynamic coordinates? An adaptation study, Experimental Brain Research, vol.103, issue.3, pp.460-470, 1995.
DOI : 10.1007/BF00241505