Strategies in sentential reasoning

Jean-Baptiste van Der Henst (1) , Yingrui Yang (2) , Johnson-Laird N. Philip (3)

1 Laboratory of Experimental Psychology - Laboratory of Experimental Psychology
2 RPI - Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
3 Princeton University

Four experiments examined the strategies that individuals develop in sentential reasoning. They led to the discovery of five different strategies. According to the theory proposed in the paper, each of the strategies depends on component tactics, which all normal adults possess, and which are based on mental models. Reasoners vary their use of tactics in ways that are not deterministic. This variation leads different individuals to assemble different strategies, which include the construction of incremental diagram corresponding to mental models, and the pursuit of the consequences of a single model step by step. Moreover, the difficulty of a problem (i.e. the number of mental models required by the premises) predisposes reasoners towards certain strategies. Likewise, the sentential connectives in the premises also bias reasoners towards certain strategies, e.g., conditional premises tend to elicit reasoning step by step whereas disjunctive premises tend to elicit incremental diagrams.

Domaines: Psychologie

Jean-Baptiste van Der Henst, Yingrui Yang, Johnson-Laird N. Philip. Strategies in sentential reasoning. Cognitive Science, 2002, 26, pp.425-468. ⟨hal-00000173⟩