Roe and fallow deer: are they compatible neighbours?

Francesco Ferretti (1, 2) , Gabriele Bertoldi (1) , Andrea Sforzi (1, 3) , Lorenzo Fattorini (4)

1 Research Unit of Behavioural Ecology, Ethology and Wildlife Management--Department of Environmental Sciences
2 BIOCONNET (Biodiversity and Conservation Network)--Department of Environmental Sciences
3 Museo di Storia Naturale della Maremma
4 Department of Quantitative Methods

The analysis of the relationships between population density and habitat features is important to evaluate the ecological needs of a species, its potential impact on ecosystems and its interspecific interactions. We analysed the spatial variation of roe deer and fallow deer densities in a Mediterranean area in summer 2007 and winter 2007/2008. Previous research has shown that fallow deer can actively displace and exclude roe deer from natural feeding sites. Here we show that both species have the greatest densities in ecotone habitats between wood and open fields (abandoned olive groves and pastures), but with contrasting geographic patterns. The fallow deer showed the greatest densities in the central northern part of the study area near to local historical release sites. The densities of roe deer were great where fallow deer were rare and low where fallow deer were abundant. Spatial overlap was great at the habitat scale, indicating a high potential for competition, but was low at the plot scale, suggesting that partitioning of space occurred at a fine scale. Supporting great numbers of deer, the ecotone areas are crucial for the management of ecosystems. We suggest that roe deer avoid areas with great densities of fallow deer and that interspecific interference from the latter affects the density and distribution of the former both at a fine and at a large scale.

Mots clés: Deer; Interspecific interactions; Population density; Ungulates

Francesco Ferretti, Gabriele Bertoldi, Andrea Sforzi, Lorenzo Fattorini. Roe and fallow deer: are they compatible neighbours?. European Journal of Wildlife Research, 2011, 57 (4), pp.775-783. ⟨10.1007/s10344-010-0487-5⟩. ⟨hal-00659048⟩