Handling and Reporting of Transurethral Resection Specimens of the Bladder in Europe: A Web-Based Survey by the European Network of Uropathology (ENUP) - Archive ouverte HAL Accéder directement au contenu
Article Dans Une Revue Histopathology Année : 2011

Handling and Reporting of Transurethral Resection Specimens of the Bladder in Europe: A Web-Based Survey by the European Network of Uropathology (ENUP)

Antonio Lopez-Beltran
  • Fonction : Auteur correspondant
  • PersonId : 908354

Connectez-vous pour contacter l'auteur
Ferran Algaba
  • Fonction : Auteur
  • PersonId : 908355
Dan M Berney
  • Fonction : Auteur
  • PersonId : 907803
Liliane Boccon-Gibod
  • Fonction : Auteur
  • PersonId : 908356
Camparo Phillipe
  • Fonction : Auteur
  • PersonId : 908357
David F Griffiths
  • Fonction : Auteur
  • PersonId : 908358
Gregor Mikuz
  • Fonction : Auteur
  • PersonId : 908359
Murali Varma
  • Fonction : Auteur
  • PersonId : 908361
Lars Egevad
  • Fonction : Auteur
  • PersonId : 908362

Résumé

AIMS: The collection of information about European practices on handling and reporting of transurethral resection specimens of the bladder (TURB). METHODS AND RESULTS: The European Network of Uropathology is a communication network that includes 335 pathology laboratories in 15 West European countries. A web-based questionnaire was answered by 52.2% of members. Some routines were adopted by a majority: formalin fixation (92.5%), separate containers for tumour and resection base (72%) and embedding of the entire specimen (60%). Cancer along/in adipose tissue would be reported as pT3a by 19.5% and non-invasive urothelial carcinoma in prostatic ducts/glands as pT4a by 16.1%. Papillary urothelial neoplasia of low malignant potential (PUNLMP) is recognized by 72.6% but rarely reported. Immunohistochemistry is rarely or sometimes used for diagnosing bladder cancer by 91.7%, and most frequently used markers are CK20 (76.9%), CK7 (66.7%) and Ki67 (38.8%). Only 24.8% report prognostic markers with Ki67 (84.4%) and p53 (64.4%) being most common. Only 50.9% use the ISUP 1998/WHO 2004 grading system followed by WHO 1973 (43.4%) and WHO 1999 (31.4%). CONCLUSIONS: There is still variability in routine practice and a need for standardization of methodologies. These results may be helpful when judging what recommendations are reasonable to issue.

Mots clés

Fichier principal
Vignette du fichier
PEER_stage2_10.1111%2Fj.1365-2559.2011.03784.x.pdf (247.56 Ko) Télécharger le fichier
Origine : Fichiers produits par l'(les) auteur(s)
Loading...

Dates et versions

hal-00616541 , version 1 (23-08-2011)

Identifiants

Citer

Antonio Lopez-Beltran, Ferran Algaba, Dan M Berney, Liliane Boccon-Gibod, Camparo Phillipe, et al.. Handling and Reporting of Transurethral Resection Specimens of the Bladder in Europe: A Web-Based Survey by the European Network of Uropathology (ENUP). Histopathology, 2011, 58 (4), pp.579. ⟨10.1111/j.1365-2559.2011.03784.x⟩. ⟨hal-00616541⟩

Collections

PEER
71 Consultations
384 Téléchargements

Altmetric

Partager

Gmail Facebook X LinkedIn More