Silencing science: partisanship and the career of a publication disputing the dangers of secondhand smoke

Sheldon Ungar (1) , Dennis Bray (2)

1 Department of Social Science
2 Institute for Coastal Research

This paper examines the silencing of science, that is, efforts to prevent the making of specific scientific claims in any all of the arenas in which these claims are typically reported or circulated. Those trying to mute the reporting or circulation of scientific claims are termed “partisans.” The paper examines silencing through a systematic examination of the “rapid responses” to a smoking study published in the claiming that secondhand smoke is not as dangerous as conventionally believed. Media coverage of the smoking study is also examined, as is the question of whether there is self-silencing by the media regarding doubts about the negative effects of passive smoke. The results suggest that the public consensus about the negative effects of passive smoke is so strong that it has become part of a regime of truth that cannot be intelligibly questioned.

Mots clés: Social Sciences & Humanities

Sheldon Ungar, Dennis Bray. Silencing science: partisanship and the career of a publication disputing the dangers of secondhand smoke. Public Understanding of Science, 2005, 14 (1), pp.5-23. ⟨10.1177/0963662505048515⟩. ⟨hal-00571056⟩