Strategizing a journal with PRP. How individual work become collective judgement
Résumé
The paper focuses on micro-practices in use that permit simultaneously two strategizing processes. First that individual work becomes a collective and institutional position through processes participating to RIO in the PRP. Second that doing strategy day after day and making the core process evolve through the evolving set of micro-practices involve in the RIO. To argue about these two transformations, we study the micro-practices, processes and routines underlying the Peer Review Process and its practices over time while the issues are built, following general strategic aims. We adopt a practice-oriented perspective, which allows us to understand how routines are acted in social and individual activities. We use descriptive method but also knowledge engineering methods. These last ones are useful to describe knowledge processes; it focuses on task, a notion that may be compared to that one of routine. An empirical study allows us to light on day to day strategizing practices in the PRP, through a longitudinal study of an academic journal.
Cette communication met en évidence l'imbrication de phases d'élaboration individuelles et collectives dans un processus de jugement complexe et à fort contenu de connaissances : la revue d'articles par les pairs dans une revue scientifique. Un modèle est proposé qui illustre l'interdépendance et la complémentarité de ces phases dont dépend à la fois l'élaboration du jugement et son acceptation sociale.
Origine : Fichiers produits par l'(les) auteur(s)
Loading...