Skip to Main content Skip to Navigation
Theses

L'argument comparatiste : essai sur les mutations du droit du travail

Abstract : The comparative discourse influences the debate on the imperative of economic efficiency in labour law ; where the comparative science requires time, attention to the legal and extra-legal can influence a legal system, a method and modesty (towards the conclusions reached), the comparative rhetoric does not obey the constraints of comparative law. The intimidation comparatism, leading figure of the dominant discourse in comparative labour law, stands in scattering instrument of "good" practices and "models" of legal institutions deemed economically efficient. It is a propaganda tool; it can hide the positions of various actors under the guise of scientific and axiological neutrality. The mobilization of the comparative argument influences and challenges the legal categories and the representations underlying labour law.
Document type :
Theses
Complete list of metadatas

https://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-02970319
Contributor : Abes Star :  Contact
Submitted on : Sunday, October 18, 2020 - 1:01:21 AM
Last modification on : Sunday, October 18, 2020 - 3:28:29 AM

File

pdf2star-1490601181-L-argument...
Version validated by the jury (STAR)

Identifiers

  • HAL Id : tel-02970319, version 1

Collections

Citation

Abdenbi Allouch. L'argument comparatiste : essai sur les mutations du droit du travail. Droit. Université d'Avignon, 2016. Français. ⟨NNT : 2016AVIG2053⟩. ⟨tel-02970319⟩

Share

Metrics

Record views

57

Files downloads

8