J. R. Schmidt and D. H. Weissman, Congruency sequence effects and previous response times: Conflict adaptation or temporal learning?, Psychological Research, vol.80, pp.590-607, 2016.

J. R. Schmidt and J. De-houwer, Contingency learning tracks with stimulus-response proportion: No evidence of misprediction costs, Experimental Psychology, vol.63, pp.79-88, 2016.

J. R. Schmidt, Temporal learning and rhythmic responding: No reduction in the proportion easy effect with variable response-stimulus intervals, Frontiers in Psychology, vol.7, p.634, 2016.

J. R. Schmidt and B. Liefooghe, Feature integration and task switching: Diminished switch costs after controlling for stimulus, response, and cue repetitions, PLOS ONE, vol.11, 2016.

J. R. Schmidt and D. H. Weissman, Contingent attentional capture triggers the congruency sequence effect, Acta Psychologica, vol.159, pp.61-68, 2015.

J. R. Schmidt, W. Notebaert, . Van-den, and E. Bussche, Is conflict adaptation an illusion?, Frontiers in Psychology, vol.6, p.172, 2015.

J. R. Schmidt, Contingency and congruency switch in the congruency sequence effect: A reply to Blais, Stefanidi, and Brewer, Frontiers in Psychology, vol.5, 1405.

J. R. Schmidt, M. De-schryver, and D. H. Weissman, Removing the influence of feature repetitions on the congruency sequence effect: Why regressing out confounds from a nested design will often fall short, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, vol.40, pp.2392-2402, 2014.

J. R. Schmidt, C. Lemercier, and J. De-houwer, Context-specific temporal learning with non-conflict stimuli: Proof-of-principle for a learning account of context-specific proportion congruent effects, Frontiers in Psychology, vol.5, 1241.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02099666

J. R. Schmidt and D. H. Weissman, Congruency sequence effects without feature integration or contingency learning confounds, PLOS ONE, vol.9, p.102337, 2014.

J. R. Schmidt, Contingencies and attentional capture: The importance of matching stimulus informativeness in the item-specific proportion congruent task, Frontiers in Psychology, vol.5, 2014.

J. R. Schmidt, List-level transfer effects in temporal learning: Further complications for the list-level proportion congruent effect, Journal of Cognitive Psychology, vol.26, pp.373-385, 2014.

J. R. Schmidt, Temporal learning and list-level proportion congruency: Conflict adaptation or learning when to respond?, PLOS ONE, vol.8, p.82320, 2013.

J. R. Schmidt, Questioning conflict adaptation: Proportion congruent and Gratton effects reconsidered, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, vol.20, pp.615-630, 2013.

J. R. Schmidt, J. Cheesman, and D. Besner, You can't Stroop a lexical decision: Is semantic processing fundamentally facilitative?, Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, vol.67, pp.130-139, 2013.

J. R. Schmidt, The Parallel Episodic Processing (PEP) model: Dissociating contingency and conflict adaptation in the item-specific proportion congruent paradigm, Acta Psychologica, vol.142, pp.119-126, 2013.

J. R. Schmidt, Attentional control and learning, 2016.

J. R. Schmidt, Reconsidering the evidence for conflict adaptation: Higher-order attentional control or lower-level learning biases?, 2015.

J. R. Schmidt, Contingency learning, temporal learning, and attentional control, 2014.

J. R. Schmidt, The conflict adaptation illusion: Reassessing the proportion congruent and Gratton effects, 2011.

J. R. Schmidt and J. De-houwer, Contingency learning overtime: SOA analyses. Invited symposium paper presented at the Belgian Association for Psychological Science in Brussels, 2010.

J. R. Schmidt, Colour-word contingency learning: A brief overview, 2010.

J. R. Schmidt, J. De-houwer, and D. Besner, Contingency learning in seven plus or minus two items: An implicit, working memory dependent process, 2008.

J. R. Schmidt and J. Cheesman, Locating the Stroop effect: Facilitation and inhibition in semantic and response processes, 2005.

J. R. Schmidt and J. Cheesman, Locating the Stroop effect: Facilitation and inhibition in semantic and response processes, 2005.

J. R. Schmidt and J. Cheesman, Locating the Stroop effect: Facilitation and inhibition in semantic and response processes, 2005.

J. R. Schmidt and J. Cheesman, Locating the Stroop effect: Facilitation and inhibition in semantic and response processes, Canada. Other talks, 2005.

J. R. Schmidt and J. De-houwer, Cue competition and incidental learning: No blocking or overshadowing in the colour-word contingency learning procedure without instructions to learn. Forthcoming poster presented at the European Society for, Cognitive Psychology, 2019.

J. R. Schmidt, J. De-houwer, and K. Rothermund, Are contingency learning and binding one and the same? Paper presented at the European Society for, Cognitive Psychology in Potsdam, 2017.

J. R. Schmidt and J. De-houwer, Misprediction costs nothing: Contingency learning and proportional retrieval. Paper presented at the Belgian Association for, Psychological Science, 2016.

J. R. Schmidt and D. H. Weissman, Contingent attentional capture triggers the congruency sequence effect. Paper presented at the Belgian Association for Psychological Science in Brussels, 2015.

J. R. Schmidt, M. De-schryver, and D. H. Weissman, Feature repetitions, sequential congruency, and regression: A response to Notebaert and Verguts, 2007.

J. R. Schmidt, Item-specific proportion congruency: Dissociating contingency and conflict adaptation. Paper presented at the European Society for, Cognitive Psychology in Budapest, 2013.

J. R. Schmidt and J. De-houwer, Colour-word contingency learning: Instructions and awareness. Paper presented at the Belgian Association for Psychological Science, 2013.

J. R. Schmidt, The temporal retrieval hypothesis: Learning when (rather than what) to respond explains list-level proportion congruent effects. Paper presented at the joint meeting of the Belgian Association for Psychological Science and the Sociedad Española de, 2012.

J. R. Schmidt and J. De-houwer, Now you see it, now you don't: Controlling for contingencies and stimulus repetitions eliminates the Gratton effect. Paper presented at the European Society for, Cognitive Psychology in, 2011.

J. R. Schmidt, Conflict and contingency: The Parallel Episodic Processing (PEP) model. Paper presented at the Psychology Conference of the Athens Institute for Education, 2011.

J. R. Schmidt and J. De-houwer, Implicit contingency learning with evaluative stimuli, 2011.

E. Abrahamse, M. Ruitenberg, S. Boddewyn, E. Oreel, M. De-schryver et al., Conflict adaptation in patients diagnosed with schizophrenia, Psychiatry Research, vol.257, pp.260-264, 2017.

E. Abrahamse, M. Ruitenberg, W. Duthoo, B. Sabbe, M. Morrens et al., Conflict adaptation in schizophrenia: Reviewing past and previewing future efforts, Cognitive Neuropsychiatry, vol.21, pp.197-212, 2016.

E. L. Abrahamse, W. Duthoo, W. Notebaert, and E. F. Risko, Attention modulation by proportion congruency: The asymmetrical list shifting effect, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, vol.39, pp.1552-1562, 2013.

L. G. Allan, Learning of contingent relationships, Learning & Behavior, vol.33, pp.127-129, 2005.

A. Allport, E. A. Styles, and S. L. Hsieh, Shifting intentional set: Exploring the dynamic control of tasks, Attention and Performance Xv, pp.421-452, 1994.

J. Altarriba and K. M. Mathis, Conceptual and lexical development in second language acquisition, Journal of Memory and Language, vol.36, pp.550-568, 1997.

S. Andrews and S. Lo, Not all skilled readers have cracked the code: Individual differences in masked form priming, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, vol.38, pp.152-163, 2012.

N. B. Atalay and M. Misirlisoy, Can contingency learning alone account for itemspecific control? Evidence from within-and between-language ISPC effects, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, vol.38, pp.1578-1590, 2012.

F. Baeyens, P. Eelen, . Van-den, and O. Bergh, Contingency awareness in evaluative conditioning: A case for unaware affective-evaluative learning, Cognition & Emotion, vol.4, pp.3-18, 1990.

D. A. Balota, A. J. Aschenbrenner, and M. J. Yap, Additive effects of word frequency and stimulus quality: The influence of trial history and data transformations, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, vol.39, pp.1563-1571, 2013.

T. Beckers, J. De-houwer, and H. Matute, Editorial: Human contingency learning, Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, vol.60, pp.289-290, 2007.

C. Blais and S. Bunge, Behavioral and neural evidence for item-specific performance monitoring, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, vol.22, pp.2758-2767, 2010.

C. Blais, S. Robidoux, E. F. Risko, and D. Besner, Item-specific adaptation and the conflict-monitoring hypothesis: A computational model, Psychological Review, vol.114, pp.1076-1086, 2007.

C. Blais, A. Stefanidi, and G. A. Brewer, The Gratton effect remains after controlling for contingencies and stimulus repetitions, Frontiers in Psychology, vol.5, 1207.

R. Borowsky and D. Besner, Visual word recognition across orthographies: On the interaction between context and degradation, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, vol.17, pp.272-276, 1991.

R. Borowsky and D. Besner, Visual word recognition: A multistage activation model, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, vol.19, pp.813-840, 1993.

M. M. Botvinick, T. S. Braver, D. M. Barch, C. S. Carter, and J. D. Cohen, Conflict monitoring and cognitive control, Psychological Review, vol.108, pp.624-652, 2001.

M. M. Botvinick, L. E. Nystrom, K. Fissell, C. S. Carter, and J. D. Cohen, Conflict monitoring versus selection-for-action in anterior cingulate cortex, Nature, vol.402, pp.179-181, 1999.

T. F. Brady and A. Oliva, Statistical learning using real-world scenes: Extracting categorical regularities without conscious intent, Psychological Science, vol.19, pp.678-685, 2008.

S. Braem, J. M. Bugg, J. R. Schmidt, M. J. Crump, D. H. Weissman et al., Measuring adaptive control in conflict tasks, 2019.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02268096

M. Brown and D. Besner, On a variant of Stroop's paradigm: Which cognitions press your buttons?, Memory & Cognition, vol.29, pp.903-904, 2001.

D. N. Bub, M. E. Masson, and C. E. Lalonde, Cognitive control in children: Stroop interference and suppression of word reading, Psychological Science, vol.17, pp.351-357, 2006.

M. J. Buehner, Contiguity and covariation in human causal inference, Learning & Behavior, vol.32, pp.230-238, 2005.

A. Bugaiska and J. P. Thibaut, Analogical reasoning and aging: The processing speed and inhibition hypothesis, Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, vol.22, pp.340-356, 2015.

J. M. Bugg, Conflict-triggered top-down control: Default mode, last resort, or no such thing, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, vol.40, pp.567-587, 2014.

J. M. Bugg, Evidence for the sparing of reactive cognitive control with age, Psychology and Aging, vol.29, pp.115-127, 2014.

J. M. Bugg and S. Chanani, List-wide control is not entirely elusive: Evidence from picture-word Stroop, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, vol.18, pp.930-936, 2011.

J. M. Bugg and K. A. Hutchison, Converging evidence for control of color-word Stroop interference at the item level, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, vol.39, pp.433-449, 2013.

J. M. Bugg, L. L. Jacoby, and S. Chanani, Why it is too early to lose control in accounts of item-specific proportion congruency effects, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, vol.37, pp.844-859, 2011.

J. M. Bugg, L. L. Jacoby, and J. P. Toth, Multiple levels of control in the Stroop task, Memory & Cognition, vol.36, pp.1484-1494, 2008.

J. M. Bugg, M. A. Mcdaniel, M. K. Scullin, and T. S. Braver, Revealing list-level control in the Stroop task by uncovering its benefits and a cost, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, vol.37, pp.1595-1606, 2011.

S. A. Bunge, N. M. Dudukovic, M. E. Thomason, C. J. Vaidya, and J. D. Gabrieli, Immature frontal lobe contributions to cognitive control in children: Evidence from fMRI, Neuron, vol.33, pp.301-311, 2002.

K. A. Carlson and J. H. Flowers, Intentional versus unintentional use of contingencies between perceptual events, Perception & Psychophysics, vol.58, pp.460-470, 1996.

C. S. Carter, M. Mintun, and J. D. Cohen, Interference and facilitation effects during selective attention: An H2 15 O study of Stroop task performance, Neuroimage, vol.2, pp.264-272, 1995.

A. C. Carver, D. J. Livesey, and M. Charles, Age related differences in Stop-Signal Task performance, International Journal of Neuroscience, vol.107, pp.43-61, 2001.

J. K. Cattell, The time it takes to see and name objects, Mind, vol.11, pp.63-65, 1886.

G. B. Chapman and S. J. Robbins, Cue interaction in human contingency judgment, Memory & Cognition, vol.18, pp.537-545, 1990.

J. Cheesman and P. M. Merikle, Distinguishing conscious from unconscious perceptual processes, Canadian Journal of Psychology, vol.40, pp.343-367, 1986.

A. T. Chen, K. Bailey, B. N. Tiernan, and R. West, Neural correlates of stimulus and response interference in a 2-1 mapping Stroop task, International Journal of Psychophysiology, vol.80, pp.129-138, 2011.

H. C. Chen and C. Ho, Development of Stroop interference in Chinese-English bilinguals, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, vol.12, pp.397-401, 1986.

C. Chiarello and L. Richards, Another look at categorical priming in the cerebral hemispheres, Neuropsychologia, vol.30, pp.381-392, 1992.

Y. Chiu, X. Jiang, and T. Egner, The caudate nucleus mediates learning of stimulus-control state associations, Journal of Neuroscience, vol.37, pp.1028-1038, 2017.

M. M. Chun and Y. H. Jian, Contextual cueing: Implicit learning and memory of visual context guides spatial attention, Cognitive Psychology, vol.36, pp.28-71, 1998.

D. Clarys, A. Bugaiska, G. Tapia, and A. Baudouin, Ageing, remembering, and executive function, Memory, vol.17, pp.158-168, 2009.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00456076

E. R. Cohen-shikora, J. Suh, and J. M. Bugg, Assessing the temporal learning account of the list-wide proportion congruence effect, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition

P. E. Comalli, J. S. Wapner, and H. Werner, Interference effects of Stroop color-word test in childhood, adulthood, and aging, Journal of Genetic Psychology, vol.100, pp.47-53, 1962.

P. M. Corballis and G. Gratton, Independent control of processing strategies for different locations in the visual field, Biological Psychology, vol.64, pp.191-209, 2003.

J. D. Cosman and S. P. Vecera, Establishment of an attentional set via statistical learning, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, vol.40, pp.1-6, 2014.

M. J. Crump, N. P. Brosowsky, and B. Milliken, Reproducing the location-based context-specific proportion congruent effect for frequency unbiased items: A reply to Hutcheon and Spieler, Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, vol.70, pp.1792-1807, 2016.

M. J. Crump, Z. Y. Gong, and B. Milliken, The context-specific proportion congruent Stroop effect: Location as a contextual cue, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, vol.13, pp.316-321, 2006.

M. J. Crump and B. Milliken, The flexibility of context-specific control: Evidence for context-driven generalization of item-specific control settings, Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, vol.62, pp.1523-1532, 2009.

M. J. Crump, J. M. Vaquero, and B. Milliken, Context-specific learning and control: The roles of awareness, task relevance, and relative salience, Consciousness and Cognition, vol.17, pp.22-36, 2008.

E. C. Dalrymple-alford, Interlingual interference in a color-naming task, Psychonomic Science, vol.10, pp.216-216, 1968.

J. De-houwer, On the role of stimulus-response and stimulus-stimulus compatibility in the Stroop effect, Memory & Cognition, vol.31, pp.353-359, 2003.

J. De-houwer, Spatial Simon effects with nonspatial responses, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, vol.11, pp.49-53, 2004.

J. De-houwer, A conceptual and theoretical analysis of evaluative conditioning, Spanish Journal of Psychology, vol.10, pp.230-241, 2007.

A. Dickinson, D. Shanks, and J. Evenden, Judgment of act-outcome contingency: The role of selective attribution, Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, vol.36, pp.29-50, 1984.

C. L. Dulaney and W. A. Rogers, Mechanisms underlying reduction in Stroop interference with practice for young and old adults, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, vol.20, pp.470-484, 1994.

K. Dunbar and C. M. Macleod, A horse race of a different color: Stroop interference patterns with transformed words, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, vol.10, pp.622-639, 1984.

W. Duyck and J. De-houwer, Semantic access in second-language visual word processing: Evidence from the semantic Simon paradigm, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, vol.15, pp.961-966, 2008.

F. N. Dyer, Color-naming interference in monolinguals and bilinguals, Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, vol.10, pp.297-302, 1971.

F. N. Dyer, The Stroop phenomenon and its use in study of perceptual, cognitive, and response processes, Memory & Cognition, vol.1, pp.106-120, 1973.

N. R. Ellis and C. L. Dulaney, Further evidence for cognitive inertia of persons with mental retardation, American Journal on Mental Retardation, vol.95, pp.613-621, 1991.

L. L. Emberson and D. Y. Rubinstein, Statistical learning is constrained to less abstract patterns in complex sensory input (but not the least), Cognition, vol.153, pp.63-78, 2016.

J. T. Enns and S. Cameron, Selective attention in young children: The relations between visual search, filtering, and priming, Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, vol.44, pp.38-63, 1987.

B. A. Eriksen and C. W. Eriksen, Effects of noise letters upon identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task, Perception & Psychophysics, vol.16, pp.143-149, 1974.

N. D. Forrin and C. M. Macleod, Relative speed of processing determines color-word contingency learning, Memory & Cognition, vol.45, pp.1206-1222, 2017.

P. Fraisse, Why is naming longer than reading? Acta Psychologica, vol.30, pp.96-103, 1969.

R. M. French, Catastrophic forgetting in connectionist networks, Trends in Cognitive Sciences, vol.3, pp.128-135, 1999.

R. M. French, C. Addyman, and D. Mareschal, TRACX: A recognition-based connectionist framework for sequence segmentation and chunk extraction, Psychological Review, vol.118, pp.614-636, 2011.

R. M. French, C. Addyman, D. Mareschal, and E. Thomas, GAMIT -A FadingGaussian Activation Model of Interval-Timing: Unifying prospective and retrospective time estimation, Timing & Time Perception Reviews, vol.1, issue.2, 2014.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01425443

C. Frings, K. Rothermund, and D. Wentura, Distractor repetitions retrieve previous responses to targets, Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, vol.60, pp.1367-1377, 2007.

M. J. Funes, J. Lupiáñez, and G. Humphreys, Analyzing the generality of conflict adaptation effects, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, vol.36, pp.147-161, 2010.

C. L. Gerstadt, Y. L. Hong, and A. Diamond, The relationship between cognitionand action: Performance of children 3 1/2-7 years old on a Stroop-like day-nighttest, Cognition, vol.53, pp.129-153, 1994.

C. Giesen, J. R. Schmidt, and K. Rothermund, An episodic account of habit acquisition: Stimulus-response bindings as a source of contingency learning, 2019.

D. L. Gilden, Fluctuations in the time required for elementary decisions, Psychological Science, vol.8, pp.296-301, 1997.

D. L. Gilden, Cognitive emissions of 1/f noise, Psychological Review, vol.108, pp.33-56, 2001.

D. L. Gilden, T. Thornton, and M. W. Mallon, 1/f noise in human cognition, Science, vol.267, pp.1837-1839, 1995.

M. O. Glaser and W. R. Glaser, Time course analysis of the Stroop phenomenon, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, vol.8, pp.875-894, 1982.

W. R. Glaser and M. O. Glaser, Context effects in Stroop-like word and picture processing, Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, vol.118, pp.13-42, 1989.

M. A. Gluck and G. H. Bower, From conditioning to category learning: An adaptive network model, Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, vol.117, pp.227-247, 1988.

C. Gonthier, T. S. Braver, and J. M. Bugg, Dissociating proactive and reactive control in the Stroop task, Memory & Cognition, vol.44, pp.778-788, 2016.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01727322

S. C. Grant and G. D. Logan, The loss of repetition priming and automaticity over time as a function of degree of initial learning, Memory & Cognition, vol.21, pp.611-618, 1993.

G. Gratton, M. G. Coles, and E. Donchin, Optimizing the use of information: Strategic control of activation of responses, Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, vol.121, pp.480-506, 1992.

L. Grégoire, P. Perruchet, and B. Poulin-charronnat, The musical Stroop effect: Opening a new avenue to research on automatisms, Experimental Psychology, vol.60, pp.269-278, 2013.

L. Grégoire, P. Perruchet, and B. Poulin-charronnat, About the unidirectionality of interference: Insight from the musical Stroop effect, Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, vol.67, pp.2071-2089, 2014.

L. Grégoire, P. Perruchet, and B. Poulin-charronnat, Is the musical Stroop effect able to keep its promises? A reply to Akiva-Kabiri and Henik, and Zakay, vol.61, pp.80-83, 2014.

L. Grégoire, P. Perruchet, and B. Poulin-charronnat, How does Stroop interference change with practice? A reappraisal from the musical Stroop paradigm, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, vol.41, pp.417-425, 2015.

H. P. Grice, Logic and conversation, Syntax and semantics 3: Speech acts, pp.41-58, 1975.

M. Grosjean, D. A. Rosenbaum, and C. Elsinger, Timing and reaction time, Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, vol.130, pp.256-272, 2001.

N. Hasshim and B. A. Parris, Assessing stimulus-stimulus (semantic) conflict in the Stroop task using saccadic two-to-one color response mapping and preresponse pupillary measures, Attention Perception & Psychophysics, vol.77, pp.2601-2610, 2015.

E. Hazeltine and J. T. Mordkoff, Resolved but not forgotten: Stroop conflict dredges up the past, Frontiers in Psychology, vol.5, 1327.

A. Heathcote, S. Brown, and D. J. Mewhort, The power law repealed: The case for an exponential law of practice, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, vol.7, pp.185-207, 2000.

A. Heinemann, W. Kunde, and A. Kiesel, Context-specific prime-congruency effects: On the role of conscious stimulus representations for cognitive control, Consciousness and Cognition, vol.18, pp.966-976, 2009.

M. Henle, On the relation between logic and thinking, Psychological Review, vol.69, pp.366-378, 1962.

D. L. Hintzman, Minerva 2: A simulation model of human memory, Behavior Research Methods Instruments & Computers, vol.16, pp.96-101, 1984.

D. L. Hintzman, Schema abstraction" in a multiple-trace memory model, Psychological Review, vol.93, pp.411-428, 1986.

D. L. Hintzman, Judgments of frequency and recognition memory in a multiple-trace memory model, Psychological Review, vol.95, pp.528-551, 1988.

W. Hofmann, J. De-houwer, M. Perugini, F. Baeyens, and G. Crombez, Evaluative conditioning in humans: A meta-analysis, Psychological Bulletin, vol.136, pp.390-421, 2010.

P. C. Holland, Occasion setting in Pavlovian conditioning, Advances in Research and Theory, vol.28, pp.69-125, 1992.

B. Hommel, Event files: Evidence for automatic integration of stimulus-response episodes, Visual Cognition, vol.5, pp.183-216, 1998.

B. Hommel, Event files: feature binding in and across perception and action, Trends in Cognitive Sciences, vol.8, pp.494-500, 2004.

B. Hommel, J. Müsseler, G. Aschersleben, and W. Prinz, The theory of event coding (TEC): A framework for perception and action planning, Behavioral and Brain Sciences, vol.24, pp.849-937, 2001.

B. Hommel, R. W. Proctor, and K. P. Vu, A feature-integration account of sequential effects in the Simon task, Psychological Research, vol.68, pp.1-17, 2004.

D. Hume, A treatise of human nature, 1969.

T. G. Hutcheon and D. H. Spieler, Contextual influences on the sequential congruency effect, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, vol.21, pp.155-162, 2014.

T. G. Hutcheon and D. H. Spieler, Limits on the generalizability of context-driven control, Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, vol.70, pp.1292-1304, 2017.

K. A. Hutchison, The interactive effects of listwide control, item-based control, and working memory capacity on Stroop performance, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, vol.37, pp.851-860, 2011.

C. Iani, G. Stella, and S. Rubichi, Response inhibition and adaptations to response conflict in 6-to 8-year-old children: Evidence from the Simon effect, Perception, & Psychophysics, vol.76, pp.1234-1241, 2014.

L. L. Jacoby, D. S. Lindsay, and S. Hessels, Item-specific control of automatic processes: Stroop process dissociations, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, vol.10, pp.638-644, 2003.

A. T. Jersild, Mental set and shift, Archives of Psychology, issue.89, p.14, 1927.

Y. H. Jiang and M. M. Chun, Selective attention modulates implicit learning, Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, vol.54, pp.1105-1124, 2001.

P. N. Johnson-laird, Mental models and human reasoning, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, vol.107, pp.18243-18250, 2010.

E. M. Jongen and L. M. Jonkman, The developmental pattern of stimulus and response interference in a color-object Stroop task: An ERP study, BMC Neuroscience, vol.9, p.82, 2008.

L. J. Kamin, Predictability, surprise, attention and conditioning, Punishment and aversive behavior, pp.279-296, 1969.

M. J. Kane and R. W. Engle, Working-memory capacity and the control of attention: The contributions of goal neglect, response competition, and task set to Stroop interference, Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, vol.132, pp.47-70, 2003.

J. G. Kerns, J. D. Cohen, A. W. Macdonald, R. Y. Cho, V. A. Stenger et al., Anterior cingulate conflict monitoring and adjustments in control, Science, vol.303, pp.1023-1026, 2004.

A. Kiesel, M. Steinhauser, M. Wendt, M. Falkenstein, K. Jost et al., Control and interference in task switching: A review, Psychological Bulletin, vol.136, pp.849-874, 2010.

J. I. Kiger and A. L. Glass, Context effects in sentence verification, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, vol.7, pp.688-700, 1981.

S. Kinoshita, K. I. Forster, and M. C. Mozer, Unconscious cognition isn't that smart: Modulation of masked repetition priming effect in the word naming task, Cognition, vol.107, pp.623-649, 2008.

S. Kinoshita and S. J. Lupker, Priming and attentional control of lexical and sublexical pathways in naming: A reevaluation, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, vol.29, pp.405-415, 2003.

S. Kinoshita, M. C. Mozer, and K. I. Forster, Dynamic adaptation to history of trial difficulty explains the effect of congruency proportion on masked priming, Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, vol.140, pp.622-636, 2011.

G. S. Klein, Semantic power measured through the interference of words with colornaming, American Journal of Psychology, vol.77, pp.576-588, 1964.

R. Kliegl, M. E. Masson, and E. M. Richter, A linear mixed model analysis of masked repetition priming, Visual Cognition, vol.18, pp.655-681, 2009.

S. Kornblum, T. Hasbroucq, and A. Osman, The dimensional overlap model for stimulus-response compatibility, Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, vol.22, pp.276-276, 1984.

S. Kornblum and J. W. Lee, Stimulus-response compatibility with relevant and irrelevant stimulus dimensions that do and do not overlap with the response, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, vol.21, pp.855-875, 1995.

S. Kornblum, G. T. Stevens, A. Whipple, and J. Requin, The effects of irrelevant stimuli: 1. The time course of stimulus-stimulus and stimulus-response consistency effects with Stroop-like stimuli, Simon-like tasks, and their factorial combinations, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, vol.25, pp.688-714, 1999.

J. F. Kroll and E. Stewart, Category interference in translation and picture naming: Evidence for asymmetric connections between bilingual memory representations, Journal of Memory and Language, vol.33, pp.149-174, 1994.

L. Heij, W. Debruyn, E. Elens, E. Hartsuiker, R. Helaha et al., Orthographic facilitation and categorical interference in a word-translation variant of the Stroop task, Canadian Journal of Psychology, vol.44, pp.76-83, 1990.

M. M. Lansbergen, J. L. Kenemans, and H. Van-engeland, Stroop interference and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: A review and meta-analysis, 2007.

, Neuropsychology, vol.21, pp.251-262

M. M. Lansbergen, E. Van-hell, and J. L. Kenemans, Impulsivity and conflict in the Stroop task: An ERP study, Journal of Psychophysiology, vol.21, pp.33-50, 2007.

L. Pelley, M. E. Mclaren, and I. P. , Retrospective revaluation in humans: Learning or memory?, Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, vol.54, pp.311-352, 2001.

C. Lehle and R. Hubner, On-the-fly adaptation of selectivity in the flanker task, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, vol.15, pp.814-818, 2008.

C. Lemercier, Incidental learning of incongruent items in a manual version of the Stroop task, Perceptual and Motor Skills, vol.108, pp.705-716, 2009.

C. Lemercier, A. Simoës-perlant, J. R. Schmidt, and C. Boujon, Stroop interference and development: Influence of expectation on color-naming response times, European Review of Applied Psychology, vol.67, pp.43-50, 2017.

Y. Levin and J. Tzelgov, Contingency learning is not affected by conflict experience: Evidence from a task conflict-free, item-specific Stroop paradigm, Acta Psychologica, vol.164, pp.39-45, 2016.

P. Lewicki, Nonconscious biasing effects of single instances on subsequent judgments, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol.48, pp.563-574, 1985.

P. Lewicki, Processing information about covariations that cannot be articulated, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, vol.12, pp.135-146, 1986.

P. Lewicki, T. Hill, and M. Czyzewska, Nonconscious acquisition of information, American Psychologist, vol.47, pp.796-801, 1992.

B. Liefooghe, S. Hughes, J. R. Schmidt, and J. De-houwer, Stroop-like effects for derived stimulus-stimulus relations, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition

O. Y. Lin, .. Macleod, and C. M. , The acquisition of simple associations as observed in color-word contingency learning, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, vol.44, pp.99-106, 2018.

D. S. Lindsay and L. L. Jacoby, Stroop process dissociations: The relationship between facilitation and interference, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, vol.20, pp.219-234, 1994.

Y. Liu, W. J. Gehring, D. H. Weissman, S. F. Taylor, and K. D. Fitzgerald, Trial-bytrial adjustments of cognitive control following errors and response conflict are altered in pediatric obsessive-compulsive disorder, Frontiers in Psychiatry, vol.3, p.41, 2012.

S. Lo and S. Andrews, To transform or not to transform: Using generalized linear mixed models to analyse reaction time data, Frontiers in Psychology, vol.6, 1171.

G. R. Loftus, On interpretation of interactions, Memory & Cognition, vol.6, pp.312-319, 1978.

G. D. Logan, Toward an instance theory of automatization, Psychological Review, vol.95, pp.492-527, 1988.

G. D. Logan and N. J. Zbrodoff, When it helps to be misled: Facilitative effects of increasing the frequency of conflicting stimuli in a Stroop-like task, Memory & Cognition, vol.7, pp.166-174, 1979.

G. D. Logan, N. J. Zbrodoff, and J. Williamson, Strategies in the color-word Stroop task, Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, vol.22, pp.135-138, 1984.

S. A. Los, Procedural differences in processing intact and degraded stimuli, Memory & Cognition, vol.22, pp.145-156, 1994.

S. A. Los, On the origin of mixing costs: Exploring information processing in pure and mixed blocks of trials, Acta Psychologica, vol.94, pp.145-188, 1996.

S. A. Los, Identifying stimuli of different perceptual categories in mixed blocks of trials: Evidence for cost in switching between computational processes, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, vol.25, pp.3-23, 1999.

S. A. Los, Identifying stimuli of different perceptual categories in pure and mixed blocks of trials: Evidence for stimulus-driven switch costs, Acta Psychologica, vol.103, pp.173-205, 1999.

D. G. Lowe and J. O. Mitterer, Selective and divided attention in a Stroop task, Canadian Journal of Psychology, vol.36, pp.684-700, 1982.

C. R. Luo, Semantic competition as the basis of stroop interference: Evidence from color-word matching tasks, Psychological Science, vol.10, pp.35-40, 1999.

S. J. Lupker, P. Brown, and L. Colombo, Strategic control in a naming task: Changing routes or changing deadlines, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, vol.23, pp.570-590, 1997.

A. W. Macdonald, J. D. Cohen, V. A. Stenger, and C. S. Carter, Dissociating the role of the dorsolateral prefrontal and anterior cingulate cortex in cognitive control, Science, vol.288, pp.1835-1838, 2000.

D. P. Mackinnon, R. E. Geiselman, and J. A. Woodward, The effects of effort on Stroop interference, Acta Psychologica, vol.58, pp.225-235, 1985.

N. J. Mackintosh, A theory of attention: Variations in associability of stimuli with reinforcement, Psychological Review, vol.82, pp.276-298, 1975.

C. M. Macleod, Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: An integrative review, Psychological Bulletin, vol.109, pp.163-203, 1991.

C. M. Macleod, Training on integrated versus separated Stroop tasks: The progression of interference and facilitation, Memory & Cognition, vol.26, pp.201-211, 1998.

E. Mägiste, Stroop tasks and dichotic translation: The development of interference patterns in bilinguals, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, vol.10, pp.304-315, 1984.

E. Mägiste, Development of intralingual and interlingual interference in bilinguals, Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, vol.14, pp.137-154, 1985.

R. L. Majeres, The combined effects of stimulus and response conditions on the delay in identifying the print color of words, Journal of Experimental Psychology, vol.102, pp.868-874, 1974.

M. E. Masson and R. Kliegl, Modulation of additive and interactive effects in lexical decision by trial history, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, vol.39, pp.898-914, 2013.

U. Mayr, E. Awh, and P. Laurey, Conflict adaptation effects in the absence of executive control, Nature Neuroscience, vol.6, pp.450-452, 2003.

S. J. Mckelvie, Learning and awareness in the Hebb digits task, Journal of General Psychology, vol.114, pp.75-88, 1987.

D. L. Medin and M. M. Schaffer, Context theory of classification learning, Psychological Review, vol.85, pp.207-238, 1978.

N. Meiran, Reconfiguration of processing mode prior to task performance, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, vol.22, pp.1423-1442, 1996.

N. Meiran, Y. Kessler, and E. Adi-japha, Control by action representation and input selection (CARIS): A theoretical framework for task switching, Psychological Research, vol.72, pp.473-500, 2008.

R. D. Melara and D. Algom, Driven by information: A tectonic theory of Stroop effects, Psychological Review, vol.110, pp.422-471, 2003.

D. E. Meyer and R. W. Schvaneveldt, Facilitation in recognizing pairs of words: Evidence of a dependence between retrieval operations, Journal of Experimental Psychology, vol.90, pp.227-234, 1971.

A. E. Michotte, The perception of causality, Trans.). London, 1946.

J. Miller, Priming is not necessary for selective-attention failures: Semantic effects of unattended, unprimed letters, Perception & Psychophysics, vol.41, pp.419-434, 1987.

R. R. Miller, R. C. Barnet, and N. J. Grahame, Assessment of the Rescorla-Wagner model, Psychological Bulletin, vol.117, pp.363-386, 1995.

S. Monsell, Task switching, Trends in Cognitive Sciences, vol.7, pp.134-140, 2003.

J. T. Mordkoff, Observation: Three reasons to avoid having half of the trials be congruent in a four-alternative forced-choice experiment on sequential modulation, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, vol.19, pp.750-757, 2012.

J. T. Mordkoff and R. Halterman, Feature integration without visual attention: Evidence from the correlated flankers task, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, vol.15, pp.385-389, 2008.

J. Morton and S. M. Chambers, Selective attention to words and colors, Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, vol.25, pp.387-397, 1973.

M. C. Mozer, S. Kinoshita, and C. Davis, Control of response initiation: Mechanisms of adaptation to recent experience, Proceedings of the twenty sixth annual conference of the Cognitive Science Society, pp.981-986, 2004.

G. Musen and L. R. Squire, Implicit learning of color-word associations using a Stroop paradigm, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, vol.19, pp.789-798, 1993.

I. J. Myung, C. Kim, and M. A. Pitt, Toward an explanation of the power law artifact: Insights from response surface analysis, Memory & Cognition, vol.28, pp.832-840, 2000.

A. Newell and P. S. Rosenbloom, Mechanisms of skill acquisition and the law of practice, Cognitive skills and their acquisition, pp.1-55, 1981.

N. J. Hillsdale and . Erlbaum,

I. Newton, 1726/1846), The mathematical principles of natural philosophy (A. Motte, Trans, vol.3

M. J. Nissen and P. Bullemer, Attentional requirements of learning: Evidence from performance measures, Cognitive Psychology, vol.19, pp.1-32, 1987.

R. M. Nosofsky, Exemplar-based accounts of relations between classification, recognition, and typicality, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, vol.14, pp.700-708, 1988.

R. M. Nosofsky, Similarity, frequency, and category representations, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, vol.14, pp.54-65, 1988.

W. Notebaert and T. Verguts, Dissociating conflict adaptation from feature integration: A multiple regression approach, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, vol.33, pp.1256-1260, 2007.

S. R. Palef and D. R. Olson, Spatial and verbal rivalry in a Stroop-like task, Canadian Journal of Psychology, vol.29, pp.201-209, 1975.

I. P. Pavlov, Conditioned reflexes, 1927.

J. M. Pearce and G. Hall, A model for Pavlovian learning: Variations in the effectiveness of conditioned but not of unconditioned stimuli, Psychological Review, vol.87, pp.532-552, 1980.

V. Pennequin, I. Nanty, and A. Khomsi, Mesurer la résistance à l'interférencechez l'enfant : élaboration d'un nouveau test à effet Stroop, 2004.

L. Psychologique, , vol.104, pp.203-226

P. Perruchet and A. Vinter, PARSER: A model for word segmentation, Journal of Memory and Language, vol.39, pp.246-263, 1998.

P. Perruchet and A. Vinter, The self-organizing consciousness, Behavioral and Brain Sciences, vol.25, pp.297-388, 2002.

G. Pleyers, O. Corneille, O. Luminet, and V. Yzerbyt, Aware and (dis)liking: Itembased analyses reveal that valence acquisition via evaluative conditioning emerges only when there is contingency awareness, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, vol.33, pp.130-144, 2007.

M. I. Posner and C. R. Snyder, Attention and cognitive control, Information processing and cognition: The Loyola Symposium, pp.55-85, 1975.

N. J. Hillsdale and . Erlbaum,

P. Praamstra and F. M. Plat, Failed suppression of direct visuomotor activation in Parkinson's disease, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, vol.13, pp.31-43, 2001.

M. S. Preston and W. E. Lambert, Interlingual interference in a bilingual version of the Stroop color-word task, Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, vol.8, pp.295-301, 1969.

R. A. Rescorla and A. R. Wagner, A theory of Pavlovian conditioning: Variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and nonreinforcement, Classical conditioning II: Current research and theory, pp.64-99, 1972.

E. F. Risko, J. R. Schmidt, and D. Besner, Filling a gap in the semantic gradient: Color associates and response set effects in the Stroop task, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, vol.13, pp.310-315, 2006.

R. D. Rogers and S. Monsell, Costs of a predictable switch between simple cognitive tasks, Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, vol.124, pp.207-231, 1995.

K. Rothermund, D. Wentura, and J. De-houwer, Retrieval of incidental stimulusresponse associations as a source of negative priming, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, vol.31, pp.482-495, 2005.

K. Rubia, S. Overmeyer, E. Taylor, M. Brammer, S. C. Williams et al., Functional frontalisation with age: Mapping neurodevelopmental trajectories with fMRI, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, vol.24, pp.13-19, 2000.

I. ?aban and J. R. Schmidt, Stimulus and response conflict from a second language: Stroop interference in weakly-bilingual and recently-trained languages, 2019.

M. Schadler and D. Thissen, The development of automatic word recog-nition and reading skill, Memory & Cognition, vol.9, pp.132-141, 1981.

P. H. Schiller, Developmental study of color-word interference, Journal of Experimental Psychology, vol.72, pp.105-108, 1966.

J. R. Schmidt, Human contingency learning, Encyclopedia of the Sciences of Learning, pp.1455-1456, 2012.

J. R. Schmidt, The Parallel Episodic Processing (PEP) model: Dissociating contingency and conflict adaptation in the item-specific proportion congruent paradigm, Acta Psychologica, vol.142, pp.119-126, 2013.

J. R. Schmidt, Questioning conflict adaptation: Proportion congruent and Gratton effects reconsidered, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, vol.20, pp.615-630, 2013.

J. R. Schmidt, Temporal learning and list-level proportion congruency: Conflict adaptation or learning when to respond?, Plos One, vol.8, p.82320, 2013.

J. R. Schmidt, Contingencies and attentional capture: The importance of matching stimulus informativeness in the item-specific proportion congruent task, Frontiers in Psychology, vol.5, p.540, 2014.

J. R. Schmidt, Contingency and congruency switch in the congruency sequence effect: A reply to Blais, Stefanidi, and Brewer, Frontiers in Psychology, vol.5, 1405.

J. R. Schmidt, List-level transfer effects in temporal learning: Further complications for the list-level proportion congruent effect, Journal of Cognitive Psychology, vol.26, pp.373-385, 2014.

J. R. Schmidt, Context-specific proportion congruent effects: An episodic learning account and computational model, Frontiers in Psychology, vol.7, p.1806, 2016.

J. R. Schmidt, Proportion congruency and practice: A contingency learning account of asymmetric list shifting effects, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, vol.42, pp.1496-1505, 2016.

J. R. Schmidt, Temporal learning and rhythmic responding: No reduction in the proportion easy effect with variable response-stimulus intervals, Frontiers in Psychology, vol.7, p.634, 2016.

J. R. Schmidt, Time-out for conflict monitoring theory: Preventing rhythmic biases eliminates the list-level proportion congruent effect, Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, vol.71, pp.52-62, 2017.

J. R. Schmidt, Best not to bet on the horserace: A comment on Forrin and MacLeod (2017) and a relevant stimulus-response compatibility view of colour-word contingency learning asymmetries, Memory & Cognition, vol.46, pp.326-335, 2018.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01985119

J. R. Schmidt, Temporal Learning Effects, Proportion Congruent Effects, and Data Transformations: A Response to Cohen-Shikora, Suh, and Bugg, 2019.

J. R. Schmidt, Evidence against conflict monitoring and adaptation: An updated review, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02268074

J. R. Schmidt, M. Augustinova, and J. De-houwer, Category learning in the colourword contingency learning paradigm, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, vol.25, pp.658-666, 2018.

J. R. Schmidt and D. Besner, The Stroop effect: Why proportion congruent has nothing to do with congruency and everything to do with contingency, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, vol.34, pp.514-523, 2008.

J. R. Schmidt and J. Cheesman, Dissociating stimulus-stimulus and response-response effects in the Stroop task, Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, vol.59, pp.132-138, 2005.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02278288

J. R. Schmidt, J. Cheesman, and D. Besner, You can't Stroop a lexical decision: Is semantic processing fundamentally facilitative?, Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, vol.67, pp.130-139, 2013.

J. R. Schmidt, M. J. Crump, J. Cheesman, and D. Besner, Contingency learning without awareness: Evidence for implicit control, Consciousness and Cognition, vol.16, pp.421-435, 2007.

J. R. Schmidt and J. De-houwer, Now you see it, now you don't: Controlling for contingencies and stimulus repetitions eliminates the Gratton effect, Acta Psychologica, vol.138, pp.176-186, 2011.

J. R. Schmidt and J. De-houwer, Adding the goal to learn strengthens learning in an unintentional learning task, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, vol.19, pp.723-728, 2012.

J. R. Schmidt and J. De-houwer, Contingency learning with evaluative stimuli: Testing the generality of contingency learning in a performance paradigm, Experimental Psychology, vol.59, pp.175-182, 2012.

J. R. Schmidt and J. De-houwer, Does temporal contiguity moderate contingency learning in a speeded performance task?, Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, vol.65, pp.408-425, 2012.

J. R. Schmidt and J. De-houwer, Learning, awareness, and instruction: Subjective contingency awareness does matter in the colour-word contingency learning paradigm, Consciousness and Cognition, vol.21, pp.1754-1768, 2012.

J. R. Schmidt and J. De-houwer, Contingency learning tracks with stimulus-response proportion: No evidence of misprediction costs, Experimental Psychology, vol.63, pp.79-88, 2016.

J. R. Schmidt and J. De-houwer, Time course of colour-word contingency learning: Practice curves, pre-exposure benefits, unlearning, and relearning, Learning and Motivation, vol.56, pp.15-30, 2016.

J. R. Schmidt and J. De-houwer, Cue competition and incidental learning: No blocking or overshadowing in the colour-word contingency learning procedure without instructions to learn, Collabra: Psychology, vol.5, 2019.

J. R. Schmidt, J. De-houwer, and D. Besner, Contingency learning and unlearning in the blink of an eye: A resource dependent process, Consciousness and Cognition, vol.19, pp.235-250, 2010.

J. R. Schmidt, J. De-houwer, and A. Moors, Learning habits: Does overtraining lead to resistance to new learning?, 2018.

J. R. Schmidt, J. De-houwer, and K. Rothermund, The Parallel Episodic Processing (PEP) Model 2.0: A single computational model of stimulus-response binding, contingency learning, power curves, and mixing costs, Cognitive Psychology, vol.91, pp.82-108, 2016.

J. R. Schmidt, M. De-schryver, and D. H. Weissman, Removing the influence of feature repetitions on the congruency sequence effect: Why regressing out confounds from a nested design will often fall short, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, vol.40, pp.2392-2402, 2014.

J. R. Schmidt, C. Giesen, and K. Rothermund, Contingency learning as binding? Testing an exemplar view of the colour-word contingency learning effect, 2018.

J. R. Schmidt, R. J. Hartsuiker, and J. De-houwer, Interference in Dutch-French bilinguals: Stimulus and response conflict in intra-and interlingual Stroop, Experimental Psychology, vol.65, pp.13-22, 2018.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01985154

J. R. Schmidt and C. Lemercier, Context-specific proportion congruent effects: Compound-cue contingency learning in disguise, Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, vol.72, pp.1119-1130, 2019.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02099654

J. R. Schmidt, C. Lemercier, and J. De-houwer, Context-specific temporal learning with non-conflict stimuli: Proof-of-principle for a learning account of context-specific proportion congruent effects, Frontiers in Psychology, vol.5, 1241.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02099666

J. R. Schmidt and B. Liefooghe, Feature integration and task switching: Diminished switch costs after controlling for stimulus, response, and cue repetitions, Plos One, vol.11, 2016.

J. R. Schmidt, B. Liefooghe, and J. De-houwer, An episodic model of task switching effects: Erasing the homunculus from memory, 2017.

J. R. Schmidt, W. Notebaert, and E. Van-den-bussche, Is conflict adaptation an illusion?, Frontiers in Psychology, vol.6, p.172, 2015.

J. R. Schmidt and V. A. Thompson, At least one" problem with "some" formal reasoning paradigms, Memory & Cognition, vol.36, pp.217-229, 2008.

J. R. Schmidt and D. H. Weissman, Congruency sequence effects without feature integration or contingency learning confounds, Plos One, vol.9, p.102337, 2014.

J. R. Schmidt and D. H. Weissman, Contingent attentional capture triggers the congruency sequence effect, Acta Psychologica, vol.159, pp.61-68, 2015.

J. R. Schmidt and D. H. Weissman, Congruency sequence effects and previous response times: Conflict adaptation or temporal learning?, Psychological Research, vol.80, pp.590-607, 2016.

D. R. Shanks, Learning: From association to cognition, Annual Review of Psychology, vol.61, pp.273-301, 2010.

D. Sharma and F. P. Mckenna, Differential components of the manual and vocal Stroop tasks, Memory & Cognition, pp.1033-1040, 1998.

S. A. Sheth, M. K. Mian, S. R. Patel, W. F. Asaad, Z. M. Williams et al., Human dorsal anterior cingulate cortex neurons mediate ongoing behavioural adaptation, Nature, vol.488, pp.218-221, 2012.

R. M. Shiffrin and W. Schneider, Controlled and automatic human information processing: II. Perceptual learning, automatic attending and a general theory, Psychological Review, vol.84, pp.127-190, 1977.

R. E. Shor, An auditory analog of the Stroop test, Journal of General Psychology, vol.93, pp.281-288, 1975.

J. R. Simon, J. L. Craft, and J. B. Webster, Reactions toward stimulus source: Analysis of correct responses and errors over a five-day period, Journal of Experimental Psychology, vol.101, pp.175-178, 1973.

J. R. Simon and A. P. Rudell, Auditory S-R compatibility: Effect of an irrelevant cue on information processing, Journal of Applied Psychology, vol.51, pp.300-304, 1967.

M. C. Smith and K. Kirsner, Language and orthography as irrelevant features in color-word and picture-word Stroop interference, Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, vol.34, pp.153-170, 1982.

C. Stahl and C. Unkelbach, Evaluative learning with single versus multiple USs: The role of contingency awareness, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, vol.35, pp.286-291, 2009.

S. Steudte-schmiedgen, T. Stalder, C. Kirschbaum, F. Weber, J. Hoyer et al., Trauma exposure is associated with increased context-dependent adjustments of cognitive control in patients with posttraumatic stress disorder and healthy controls, Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, vol.14, pp.1310-1319, 2014.

S. S. Stevens, On the theory of scales of measurement, Science, vol.103, pp.677-680, 1946.

N. Stirling, Stroop interference: An input and an output phenomenon, Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, vol.31, pp.121-132, 1979.

J. R. Stroop, Studies on interference in serial verbal reactions, Journal of Experimental Psychology, vol.18, pp.643-661, 1935.

M. J. Sugg and J. E. Mcdonald, Time-course of inhibition in color-response and word-response versions of the Stroop task, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, vol.20, pp.647-675, 1994.

N. S. Sutherland and N. J. Mackintosh, Mechanisms of animal discrimination learning, 1971.

J. P. Thibaut, R. French, and M. Vezneva, The development of analogy making in children: Cognitive load and executive functions, Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, vol.106, pp.1-19, 2010.

S. P. Tipper, T. A. Bourque, S. H. Anderson, and J. C. Brehaut, Mechanisms ofattention: A developmental study, Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, vol.48, pp.353-378, 1989.

M. Torres-quesada, M. J. Funes, and J. Lupiáñez, Dissociating proportion congruent and conflict adaptation effects in a Simon-Stroop procedure, Acta Psychologica, vol.172, pp.203-210, 2013.

B. Tulek, N. B. Atalay, F. Kanat, and M. Suerdem, Attentional control is partially impaired in obstructive sleep apnea syndrome, Journal of Sleep Research, vol.22, pp.422-429, 2013.

J. Tzelgov, A. Henik, and D. Leiser, Controlling Stroop interference: Evidence from a bilingual task, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, vol.16, pp.760-771, 1990.

L. L. Van-duren and A. F. Sanders, On the robustness of the additive factors stage structure in blocked and mixed choice reaction designs, Acta Psychologica, vol.69, pp.83-94, 1988.

V. Van-veen and C. S. Carter, Separating semantic conflict and response conflict in the Stroop task: A functional MRI study, Neuroimage, vol.27, pp.497-504, 2005.

A. Vandierendonck, B. Liefooghe, and F. Verbruggen, Task switching: Interplay of reconfiguration and interference control, Psychological Bulletin, vol.136, pp.601-626, 2010.

T. Verguts and W. Notebaert, Hebbian learning of cognitive control: Dealing with specific and nonspecific adaptation, Psychological Review, vol.115, pp.518-525, 2008.

P. Verhaeghen and L. D. Meersman, Aging and the Stroop effect: Ameta-analysis, Psychology and Aging, vol.13, pp.120-126, 1998.

R. A. Virzi and H. E. Egeth, Toward a translational model of Stroop interference, Memory & Cognition, vol.13, pp.304-319, 1985.

R. E. Warren, Stimulus encoding and memory, Journal of Experimental Psychology, vol.94, pp.90-100, 1972.

D. H. Weissman, K. Colter, B. Drake, and C. Morgan, The congruency sequence effect transfers across different response modes, Acta Psychologica, vol.161, pp.86-94, 2015.

D. H. Weissman, T. Egner, Z. Hawks, and J. Link, The congruency sequence effect emerges when the distracter precedes the target, Acta Psychologica, vol.156, pp.8-21, 2015.

D. H. Weissman, Z. W. Hawks, and T. Egner, Different levels of learning interact to shape the congruency sequence effect, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, vol.42, pp.566-583, 2016.

D. H. Weissman, J. F. Jiang, and T. Egner, Determinants of congruency sequence effects without learning and memory confounds, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, vol.40, pp.2022-2037, 2014.

M. Wendt and A. Kiesel, Conflict adaptation in time: Foreperiods as contextual cues for attentional adjustment, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, vol.18, pp.910-916, 2011.

R. West and G. C. Baylis, Effect of increased response dominance and contextual disintegration on the Stroop interference effect in older adults, Psychology and Aging, vol.13, pp.206-217, 1998.

P. Wühr, W. Duthoo, and W. Notebaert, Generalizing attentional control across dimensions and tasks: Evidence from transfer of proportion-congruent effects, Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, vol.68, pp.779-801, 2015.

N. Yeung and S. Monsell, The effects of recent practice on task switching, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, vol.29, pp.919-936, 2003.

N. Yeung and S. Monsell, Switching between tasks of unequal familiarity: The role of stimulus-attribute and response-set selection, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, vol.29, pp.455-469, 2003.

H. Zhang and S. Kornblum, The effects of stimulus-response mapping and irrelevant stimulus-response and stimulus-stimulus overlap in four-choice Stroop tasks with single-carrier stimuli, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, vol.24, pp.3-19, 1998.

H. Zhang, J. Zhang, and S. Kornblum, A parallel distributed processing model of stimulus-stimulus and stimulus-response compatibility, Cognitive Psychology, vol.38, pp.386-432, 1999.