S. Abiteboul, R. Hull, and V. Vianu, Foundations of Databases, 1995.

S. Abiteboul, L. Segoufin, and V. Vianu, Representing and querying XML with incomplete information, ACM Transactions on Database Systems, vol.31, issue.1, pp.208-254, 2006.
DOI : 10.1145/1132863.1132869

URL : http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.189.5285

A. Algergawy, R. Nayak, and G. Saake, Element similarity measures in XML schema matching, Information Sciences, vol.180, issue.24, pp.4975-4998, 2010.
DOI : 10.1016/j.ins.2010.08.022

S. Amano, L. Libkin, and F. Murlak, XML schema mappings, Proceedings of the 28th ACM Symposium on Principles of Database Systems, PODS '09, pp.33-42, 2009.
DOI : 10.1145/1559795.1559801

J. Amavi, Comparaison des langages d'arbres pour la substitution de services web (in french), 2010.

J. Amavi, B. Bouchou, and A. Savary, On Correcting XML Documents with Respect to a Schema, The Computer Journal, vol.57, issue.5, pp.6-88, 2013.
DOI : 10.1093/comjnl/bxt006

URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00999637

J. Amavi, B. Bouchou, and A. Savary, On Correcting XML Documents with Respect to a Schema, The Computer Journal, vol.57, issue.5, pp.639-674, 2014.
DOI : 10.1093/comjnl/bxt006

URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00999637

J. Amavi, J. Chabin, M. H. Ferrari, and P. Réty, Weak Inclusion for XML Types, Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Implementation and Application of Automata, pp.30-41, 2011.
DOI : 10.1137/0219027

URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/inria-00594520

J. Amavi, J. Chabin, M. H. Ferrari, and P. Réty, A ToolBox for Conservative XML Schema Evolution and Document Adaptation, 25th International Conference on Database and Expert Systems Applications, DEXA, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2014.
DOI : 10.1007/978-3-319-10073-9_24

URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01016214

J. Amavi, J. Chabin, and P. Réty, Weak Inclusion for Recursive XML Types, Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Implementation and Application of Automata, pp.78-89
DOI : 10.1007/978-3-642-31606-7_7

URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00701201

J. Amavi and M. H. Ferrari, Filtering XFD toward interoperability, Proceedings of the 28th Annual ACM Symposium on Applied Computing, SAC '13, pp.868-871
DOI : 10.1145/2480362.2480529

URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00771002

J. Amavi and M. H. Ferrari, Maximal Set of XML Functional Dependencies over Multiple Systems, BDA, 2013.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00861102

A. Aranda-andújar, F. Bugiotti, J. Camacho-rodríguez, D. Colazzo, F. Goasdoué et al., AMADA, Proceedings of the 21st ACM international conference on Information and knowledge management, CIKM '12, pp.2749-2751
DOI : 10.1145/2396761.2398749

M. Arenas and L. Libkin, A normal form for XML documents, Proceedings of the 21th ACM symposium on Principles of database systems, PODS '02, pp.85-96, 2002.

M. Arenas and L. Libkin, A normal form for XML documents, ACM Transactions on Database Systems, vol.29, issue.1, pp.195-232, 2004.
DOI : 10.1145/974750.974757

M. Arenas and L. Libkin, XML data exchange : Consistency and query answering, Proceedings of the 24th ACM Symposium on Principles of Database Systems, PODS '05, pp.13-24, 2005.

P. Atzeni and N. M. Morfuni, Functional dependencies and constraints on null values in database relations, Information and Control, vol.70, issue.1, pp.1-31, 1986.
DOI : 10.1016/S0019-9958(86)80022-5

Z. Bellahsene and F. Duchateau, Tuning for Schema Matching, Schema Matching and Mapping, Data-Centric Systems and Applications, pp.293-316, 2011.
DOI : 10.1007/978-3-642-16518-4_10

URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/lirmm-00581395

E. Bertino, G. Guerrini, and M. Mesiti, A matching algorithm for measuring the structural similarity between an XML document and a DTD and its applications, Information Systems, vol.29, issue.1, pp.23-46, 2004.
DOI : 10.1016/S0306-4379(03)00031-0

E. Bertino, G. Guerrini, and M. Mesiti, Measuring the structural similarity among XML documents and DTDs, Journal of Intelligent Information Systems, vol.42, issue.3, pp.55-92, 2008.
DOI : 10.1007/s10844-006-0023-y

P. Bille, A survey on tree edit distance and related problems, Theoretical Computer Science, vol.337, issue.1-3, pp.217-239, 2005.
DOI : 10.1016/j.tcs.2004.12.030

P. Bille and I. L. Gørtz, The Tree Inclusion Problem: In Optimal Space and Faster, Automata, Languages and Programming, 32nd ICALP, pp.66-77, 2005.
DOI : 10.1007/11523468_6

A. Bonifati, E. Chang, T. Ho, L. V. Lakshmanan, R. Pottinger et al., Schema mapping and query translation in heterogeneous P2P XML databases, The VLDB Journal, vol.10, issue.2???3, pp.231-256, 2010.
DOI : 10.1007/s00778-009-0159-9

A. Bonifati, G. Mecca, P. Papotti, and Y. Velegrakis, Discovery and Correctness of Schema Mapping Transformations, Schema Matching and Mapping, Data-Centric Systems and Applications, pp.111-147
DOI : 10.1007/978-3-642-16518-4_5

U. Boobna and M. De-rougemont, Correctors for XML Data, Proceedings of XSym 04, pp.97-111
DOI : 10.1007/978-3-540-30081-6_8

A. Bouajjani, P. Habermehl, L. Holík, T. Touili, and T. Vojnar, Antichain-Based Universality and Inclusion Testing over Nondeterministic Finite Tree Automata, Int. Conf. on Implementation and Applications of Automata, CIAA, pp.57-67, 2008.
DOI : 10.1007/978-3-540-70844-5_7

B. Bouchou, A. Cheriat, M. H. Ferrari, D. Laurent, M. Lima et al., Efficient constraint validation for updated XML databases, Informatica, vol.31, issue.3, pp.285-310, 2007.

B. Bouchou, A. Cheriat, M. H. Ferrari, and A. Savary, Integrating Correction into Incremental Validation, Proceeding of BDA 06, pp.17-20, 2006.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/inria-00461224

B. Bouchou, A. Cheriat, M. H. Ferrari, and A. Savary, XML Document Correction: Incremental Approach Activated by Schema Validation, 2006 10th International Database Engineering and Applications Symposium (IDEAS'06), pp.228-238, 2006.
DOI : 10.1109/IDEAS.2006.54

URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/inria-00461226

B. Bouchou and D. Duarte, Assisting XML Schema Evolution that Preserves Validity, Proceedings of SBBD 07, pp.270-284, 2007.

B. Bouchou, D. Duarte, M. H. Ferrari, D. Laurent, and M. A. Musicante, Schema Evolution for XML: A Consistency-Preserving Approach, Proceedings of MFCS 04, pp.876-888, 2004.
DOI : 10.1007/978-3-540-28629-5_69

B. Bouchou, M. H. Ferrari, and M. Lima, Contraintes d'int??grit?? pour XML. Visite guid??e par une syntaxe homog??ne, Techniques et sciences informatiques, vol.28, issue.3, pp.331-364, 2009.
DOI : 10.3166/tsi.28.331-364

B. Bouchou, M. H. Ferrari, and M. V. Lima, A grammarware for the incremental validation of integrity constraints on XML documents under multiple updates. Transactions on Large-Scale Data and Knowledge-Centered Systems, TLDKS JournalLNCS, vol.6, issue.36, pp.5-37, 2012.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00738287

L. Boytsov, Indexing methods for approximate dictionary searching, Journal of Experimental Algorithmics, vol.16, issue.115, pp.99-116, 2011.
DOI : 10.1145/1963190.1963191

A. Brüggeman-klein, D. Wood, P. Buneman, S. Davidson, W. Fan et al., One-unambiguous regular languages Information and Computation Keys for XML, WWW10, pp.182-206, 1998.

P. Buneman, S. B. Davidson, W. Fan, C. S. Hara, and W. C. Tan, Reasoning about keys for XML, Information Systems, vol.28, issue.8, pp.1037-1063, 2003.
DOI : 10.1016/S0306-4379(03)00028-0

P. Caron and D. Ziadi, Characterization of Glushkov automata, Theoretical Computer Science, vol.233, issue.1-2, pp.75-90, 2000.
DOI : 10.1016/S0304-3975(97)00296-X

E. Castanier, R. Coletta, P. Valduriez, and C. Frisch, Public data integration with websmatch, BDA 2012, pp.2012-2048
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/lirmm-00750910

F. Cavalieri, G. Guerrini, and M. Mesiti, Updating XML schemas and associated documents through exup, 2011 IEEE 27th International Conference on Data Engineering, pp.1320-1323, 2011.
DOI : 10.1109/ICDE.2011.5767951

F. Cecchin, C. D. De-aguiar-ciferri, and C. S. Hara, XML Data Fusion, DaWak, pp.297-308, 2010.
DOI : 10.1007/978-3-642-15105-7_24

J. Chabin, M. Halfeld-ferrari-alves, M. A. Musicante, and P. Réty, Conservative type extensions for XML data. T. Large-Scale Data-and Knowledge-Centered Systems, TLDKS JournalLNCS, vol.7980, issue.131, pp.65-94, 2013.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00822430

J. Champavère, R. Guilleron, A. Lemay, and J. Niehren, Efficient Inclusion Checking for Deterministic Tree Automata and DTDs, Int. Conf. Language and Automata Theory and Applications, pp.184-195, 2008.
DOI : 10.1007/978-3-540-88282-4_18

Y. Chen and Y. Chen, A new tree inclusion algorithm, Information Processing Letters, vol.98, issue.6, pp.253-262, 2006.
DOI : 10.1016/j.ipl.2005.11.022

Y. Chen, Y. Shi, and Y. Chen, Tree inclusion algorithm, signatures and evaluation of path-oriented queries, Proceedings of the 2006 ACM symposium on Applied computing , SAC '06, pp.1020-1025, 2006.
DOI : 10.1145/1141277.1141521

A. Cheriat, Une méthode de correction de la structure de documents XML dans le cadre d'une validation incrémentale, pp.3-87, 2006.

R. Chirkova, L. Libkin, and J. L. Reutter, Tractable XML data exchange via relations, Proceedings of the 20th ACM Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, CIKM 2011, pp.1629-1638, 2011.

J. Clark and S. Derose, XML path language (XPath) -version 1.0. Available at http ://www.w3.org, 1999.

E. F. Codd, Extending the database relational model to capture more meaning, ACM Transactions on Database Systems, vol.4, issue.4, pp.397-434, 1979.
DOI : 10.1145/320107.320109

D. Colazzo, G. Ghelli, L. Pardini, and C. Sartiani, Linear inclusion for XML regular expression types, Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, CIKM, pp.137-146, 2009.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/inria-00536881

D. Colazzo, G. Ghelli, and C. Sartiani, Efficient asymmetric inclusion between regular expression types, Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Database Theory, ICDT '09, pp.174-182, 2009.
DOI : 10.1145/1514894.1514916

URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/inria-00536884

G. Crane, What do you do with a million books ? D-Lib Magazine, p.36, 2006.

D. T. Barnard, G. Clarke, and N. Duncan, Tree-to-tree Correction for Document Trees, 1995.

H. Do and E. Rahm, COMA ??? A system for flexible combination of schema matching approaches, Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Very Large Data Bases, VLDB '02, pp.610-621, 2002.
DOI : 10.1016/B978-155860869-6/50060-3

H. Do and E. Rahm, Matching large schemas: Approaches and evaluation, Information Systems, vol.32, issue.6, pp.857-885, 2007.
DOI : 10.1016/j.is.2006.09.002

M. W. Du and S. C. Chang, A model and a fast algorithm for multiple errors spelling correction, Acta Informatica, vol.21, issue.1, pp.281-302, 1992.
DOI : 10.1007/BF01185682

F. Duchateau, R. Coletta, Z. Bellahsene, and R. J. Miller, (Not) yet another matcher, Proceeding of the 18th ACM conference on Information and knowledge management, CIKM '09, pp.1537-1540, 2009.
DOI : 10.1145/1645953.1646165

F. Duchateau, R. Coletta, Z. Bellahsene, and R. J. Miller, YAM, Proceeding of the 18th ACM conference on Information and knowledge management, CIKM '09, pp.2079-2080, 2009.
DOI : 10.1145/1645953.1646311

URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/lirmm-00399184

R. Fagin, L. Haas, M. Hernández, R. J. Miller, L. Popa et al., Clio: Schema Mapping Creation and Data Exchange, Conceptual Modeling : Foundations and Applications, pp.198-236, 2009.
DOI : 10.1145/376284.375729

R. Fagin, P. G. Kolaitis, R. J. Miller, and L. Popa, Data exchange: semantics and query answering, Database Theory, pp.89-124, 2005.
DOI : 10.1016/j.tcs.2004.10.033

URL : http://doi.org/10.1016/j.tcs.2004.10.033

R. Fagin, P. G. Kolaitis, L. Popa, and W. C. Tan, Schema Mapping Evolution Through Composition and Inversion, Schema Matching and Mapping, pp.191-222, 2011.
DOI : 10.1007/978-3-642-16518-4_7

URL : http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.308.9125

F. Fassetti and B. Fazzinga, Approximate functional dependencies for XML data, ADBIS Research Communications, 2007.

F. Gire and H. Idabal, Regular tree patterns, Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Data Semantics, DataSem '10, 2010.
DOI : 10.1145/1754239.1754260

URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00662995

G. Guerrini, M. Mesiti, and M. Sorrenti, XML Schema Evolution: Incremental Validation and Efficient Document Adaptation, Proceedings of XSym 07, pp.92-106, 2007.
DOI : 10.1007/978-3-540-75288-2_8

M. H. Ferrari-alves, Les aspects dynamiques de XML spécification des interfaces de services web avec PEWS. Habilitation à diriger des recherches, pp.5-48, 2007.

S. Hartmann and T. Trinh, Axiomatising Functional Dependencies for XML with Frequencies, Proceedings of the 4th international conference on Foundations of Information and Knowledge Systems, FoIKS'06, pp.159-178, 2006.
DOI : 10.1007/11663881_10

M. Hartung, J. Terwilliger, and E. Rahm, Recent Advances in Schema and Ontology Evolution, Schema Matching and Mapping, Data-Centric Systems and Applications, pp.149-190, 2011.
DOI : 10.1007/978-3-642-16518-4_6

Q. He and T. W. Ling, Extending and inferring functional dependencies in schema transformation, Proceedings of the Thirteenth ACM conference on Information and knowledge management , CIKM '04, pp.12-21, 2004.
DOI : 10.1145/1031171.1031177

K. Horie and N. Suzuki, Extracting differences between regular tree grammars, Proceedings of the 28th Annual ACM Symposium on Applied Computing, SAC '13, pp.859-864
DOI : 10.1145/2480362.2480527

R. Hull and M. Yoshikawa, ILOG : declarative creation and manipulation of object identifiers, Proceedings of the Sixteenth International Conference on Very Large Databases, pp.455-468, 1990.

W. Lipski, Incomplete information in logical databases Incomplete information in relational databases, IEEE Data Eng. Bull. J. ACM, vol.12, issue.314, pp.29-40761, 1984.

P. Kilpeläinen and H. Mannila, Ordered and Unordered Tree Inclusion, SIAM Journal on Computing, vol.24, issue.2, pp.340-356, 1995.
DOI : 10.1137/S0097539791218202

D. E. Knuth, Fundamental Algorithms, The Art of Computer Programming, 1973.

G. Koloniari, E. Pitoura, E. Bertino, S. Christodoulakis, D. Plexousakis et al., Content-Based Routing of Path Queries in Peer-to-Peer Systems, Advances in Database Technology -EDBT 2004, pp.29-47, 2004.
DOI : 10.1007/978-3-540-24741-8_4

L. Kot and W. M. White, Characterization of the Interaction of XML Functional Dependencies with DTDs, ICDT-11th International Conference on Database Theory, pp.119-133, 2007.
DOI : 10.1007/11965893_9

M. Lee, T. W. Ling, and W. L. Low, Designing Functional Dependencies for XML, Extending Database Technology (EDBT), pp.124-141, 2002.
DOI : 10.1007/3-540-45876-X_10

M. L. Lee, L. H. Yang, W. Hsu, and X. Yang, XClust, Proceedings of the eleventh international conference on Information and knowledge management , CIKM '02, pp.292-299, 2002.
DOI : 10.1145/584792.584841

E. Leonardi, T. T. Hoai, S. S. Bhowmick, and S. K. Madria, DTD-Diff: A change detection algorithm for DTDs, Data & Knowledge Engineering, vol.61, issue.2, pp.384-402, 2007.
DOI : 10.1016/j.datak.2006.06.003

M. Levene and G. Loizou, A guided tour of relational databases and beyond, 1999.
DOI : 10.1007/978-0-85729-349-7

M. Lima, Contraintes d'intégrité en XML, pp.50-85, 2007.

W. Lipski, On Databases with Incomplete Information, Journal of the ACM, vol.28, issue.1, pp.41-70, 1981.
DOI : 10.1145/322234.322239

J. Madhavan, P. A. Bernstein, and E. Rahm, Generic schema matching with Cupid, Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Very Large Data Bases, VLDB '01, pp.49-58, 2001.

D. Maier, A. O. Mendelzon, and Y. Sagiv, Testing implications of data dependencies, ACM Transactions on Database Systems, vol.4, issue.4, pp.455-469, 1979.
DOI : 10.1145/320107.320115

M. Mani and D. Lee, XML to Relational Conversion Using Theory of Regular Tree Grammars, VLDB Workshop on EEXTT, pp.81-103, 2002.
DOI : 10.1007/3-540-36556-7_6

W. Martens, F. Neven, T. Schwentick, P. Mork, L. Seligman et al., Complexity of decision problems for simple regular expressions Cité page 32 The harmony integration workbench, Journal on Data Semantics XI, pp.889-900, 2004.

M. Murata, D. Lee, M. Mani, and K. Kawaguchi, Taxonomy of XML schema languages using formal language theory, ACM Transactions on Internet Technology, vol.5, issue.4, pp.660-704, 2005.
DOI : 10.1145/1111627.1111631

F. Neven, Automata theory for XML researchers, ACM SIGMOD Record, vol.31, issue.3, p.32, 2002.
DOI : 10.1145/601858.601869

T. Nösinger, M. Klettke, and A. Heuer, XML schema transformations (the ELaX approach ), Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Database and Expert Systems Applications, pp.293-302, 2013.

K. Oflazer, Error-tolerant Finite-state Recognition with Applications to Morphological Analysis and Spelling Correction, Computational Linguistics, vol.22, issue.100, pp.73-89, 1996.

T. Pankowski, Reconciling Inconsistent Data in Probabilistic XML Data Integration, Sharing Data, Information and Knowledge, 25th British National Conference on Databases - BNCOD, pp.75-86, 2008.
DOI : 10.1007/978-3-540-70504-8_8

M. Raghavachari and O. Shmueli, Efficient Schema-Based Revalidation of XML, Proceedings of EDBT 04, pp.639-657, 2004.
DOI : 10.1007/978-3-540-24741-8_37

M. Raghavachari and O. Shmueli, Efficient Revalidation of XML Documents, IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, vol.19, issue.4, pp.554-567, 2007.
DOI : 10.1109/TKDE.2007.1004

E. Rahm, Towards Large-Scale Schema and Ontology Matching, Schema Matching and Mapping, Data-Centric Systems and Applications, pp.3-27, 2011.
DOI : 10.1007/978-3-642-16518-4_1

P. Réty, J. Chabin, and J. Chen, Synchronized ContextFree Tree-tuple Languages, 2006.

T. Richter, A new algorithm for the ordered tree inclusion problem, Combinatorial Pattern Matching, pp.150-166, 1997.
DOI : 10.1007/3-540-63220-4_57

A. Savary, J. Waszczuk, and A. Przepiórkowski, Towards the Annotation of Named Entities in the Polish National Corpus, Proceedings of LREC 10 European Language Resources Association, pp.17-23, 2010.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01024159

S. M. Selkow, The tree-to-tree editing problem, Information Processing Letters, vol.6, issue.6, pp.184-186, 1977.
DOI : 10.1016/0020-0190(77)90064-3

M. S. Shahriar and J. Liu, Preserving Functional Dependency in XML Data Transformation, ADBIS '08 : Proceedings of the 12th East European conference on Advances in Databases and Information Systems, pp.262-278, 2008.
DOI : 10.1007/978-3-540-85713-6_19

M. Shoaran and A. Thomo, Evolving schemas for streaming XML, Theoretical Computer Science, vol.412, issue.35, pp.4545-4557, 2011.
DOI : 10.1016/j.tcs.2011.04.037

P. Shvaiko and J. Euzenat, A Survey of Schema-Based Matching Approaches, Journal on Data Semantics IV Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol.3730, pp.146-171, 2005.
DOI : 10.1007/11603412_5

URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00922287

S. Staworko and J. Chomicki, Validity-Sensitive Querying of XML Databases, Proceedings of EDBT 06, pp.164-177, 2006.
DOI : 10.1007/11896548_16

S. Staworko, E. Filiot, and J. Chomicki, Querying Regular Sets of XML Documents, Proceedings of LiD 08, pp.116-130, 2008.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/inria-00275491

D. Suciu, Typechecking for semistructured data In International workshop on database programming languages, LNCS, vol.2397, pp.1-20, 2001.

N. Suzuki, An edit operation-based approach to the inclusion problem for DTDs, Proceedings of the 2007 ACM symposium on Applied computing , SAC '07, pp.482-488, 2007.
DOI : 10.1145/1244002.1244115

N. Suzuki, Finding K Optimum Edit Scripts between an XML Document and a Regular Tree Grammar, Proceedings of EROW 07, pp.88-128, 2007.

N. Suzuki, An Algorithm for Inferring K Optimum Transformations of XML Document from Update Script to DTD, Proceedings of COMAD 08, pp.210-221, 2008.
DOI : 10.1587/transinf.E93.D.2198

N. Suzuki, An Algorithm for Inferring K Optimum Transformations of XML Document from Update Script to DTD, IEICE Transactions on Information and Systems, vol.93, issue.8, pp.93-2198, 2010.
DOI : 10.1587/transinf.E93.D.2198

N. Suzuki and Y. Fukushima, An XML document transformation algorithm inferred from an edit script between DTDs, Proceedings of the 19th Conference on Australasian Database, pp.175-184, 2007.

M. Svoboda, Processing of Incorrect XML Data Master's thesis, pp.127-221, 2010.

M. Svoboda and I. Mlýnková, Correction of Invalid XML Documents with Respect to Single Type Tree Grammars, Proceedings of NDT 11, pp.179-194
DOI : 10.1007/978-3-540-72524-4_32

J. Tekli, R. Chbeir, A. Traina, and C. Traina, Abstract, Open Computer Science, vol.1, issue.1, pp.117-136, 2011.
DOI : 10.2478/s13537-011-0005-1

J. Tekli, R. Chbeir, and K. Yétongnon, Structural Similarity Evaluation Between XML Documents and DTDs, Proceedings of WISE 07, pp.196-211
DOI : 10.1007/978-3-540-76993-4_17

URL : http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.91.4461

J. Tekli, R. Chbeir, and K. Yetongnon, An overview on XML similarity: Background, current trends and future directions, Computer Science Review, vol.3, issue.3, pp.151-173, 2009.
DOI : 10.1016/j.cosrev.2009.03.001

URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01093568

A. Thomo, S. Venkatesh, and Y. Y. Ye, Visibly Pushdown Transducers for Approximate Validation of Streaming XML, Proceedings of FoIKS 08, pp.219-238, 2008.
DOI : 10.1007/978-3-540-77684-0_16

M. Vincent, J. Liu, and M. Mohania, The implication problem for ???closest node??? functional dependencies in complete XML documents, Journal of Computer and System Sciences, vol.78, issue.4, pp.1045-1098, 2012.
DOI : 10.1016/j.jcss.2012.01.003

M. W. Vincent, J. Liu, and C. Liu, Functional dependencies, from relational to XML, Ershov Memorial Conference, pp.531-538, 2003.

M. W. Vincent, J. Liu, and C. Liu, Strong functional dependencies and their application to normal forms in XML, ACM Transactions on Database Systems, vol.29, issue.3, pp.445-462, 2004.
DOI : 10.1145/1016028.1016029

R. A. Wagner and M. J. Fischer, The String-to-String Correction Problem, Journal of the ACM, vol.21, issue.1, pp.168-173, 1974.
DOI : 10.1145/321796.321811

J. Wang and R. Topor, Removing XML data redundancies using functional and equality-generating dependencies, ADC '05 : Proceedings of the 16th Australasian database conference, pp.65-74, 2005.

X. Wu, T. W. Ling, M. Lee, and G. Dobbie, Designing semistructured databases using ORA-SS model, Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Web Information Systems Engineering, 2001.

G. Xing, C. R. Malla, Z. Xia, and S. D. Venkata, Computing edit distances between an XML document and a schema and its application in document classification, Proceedings of the 2006 ACM symposium on Applied computing , SAC '06, pp.831-835, 2006.
DOI : 10.1145/1141277.1141467

C. Yu and L. Popa, Semantic adaptation of schema mappings when schemas evolve, Proceedings of the 31st International Conference on Very Large Data Bases, VLDB '05, pp.1006-1017, 2005.

X. Zhao, J. Xin, and E. Zhang, XML Functional Dependency and Schema Normalization, 2009 Ninth International Conference on Hybrid Intelligent Systems, pp.307-312, 2009.
DOI : 10.1109/HIS.2009.276

D. Ziadi, J. L. Ponty, and J. Champarnaud, Passage d'une expression rationnelle à un automate fini non-deterministe, pp.177-203, 1997.

A. .. Annexe-générale-sommaire, 1 Preuve de correction du calcul de la grammaire de W I(L(G)), p.187

. Démonstration, Nous supposons un arbre XML T qui est complet par rapport à IP

]. and .. .. P-n-[-e-n-]-}-?-p-i, La preuve sera faite par contradiction. Supposons que T |= f . D'après la Définition 4.16, nous déduisons qu'il existe deux projections ? 1 and ? 2 pour la branche

C. Pour-chaque and . Ip, = 2 sauf dans les cas suivants : (a) ou (c) en considérant l'égalité par valeur, |Instances(C/P, t)| = 2 provoque la violation de la condition 1 pour un autre chemin C, IP tel que P ? Q, ou (d) Last(P) ? ? att et Parent(C/P) vérifie les conditions 2a, ou 2b

A. Lemme, F. Soit, and X. Un-ensemble-de, type, value) un document XML où t est un arbre bi-instance. Soit IP l'ensemble de chemins associés à T et soit C/X ? IP et E les types d'égalités associés à X. Les propriétés suivantes sont vérifiées pour t : ? pour tous les chemins R i nous Cette situation est similaire à la situation 1b. Par conséquent nous pouvons construire un arbre avec deux instances de P qui soit una arbre bi-instance respectant les contraintes sur les chemins R i

@. Il-existe-un-chemin, R. Tel-que, and C. /. , Cette situation est similaire à la situation 1c. Par conséquent nous ne pouvons pas construire un arbre avec deux instances de P qui soit un arbre bi-instance respectant les contraintes sur le chemin R j . Ainsi nous concluons que

. Et-comme-l-'arbre-t-est-un-arbre and . Complet, chacun des deux instances de Parent(P) doit avoir un noeud attribut Last(P) et donc |Instances(C/P, t)| = 2. Nous obtenons une contradiction avec l'hypothèse |Instances(C/P, t)| = 1. En conclusion l'arbre t ne possède qu'une seule instance pour le chemin Parent(P), Notons que puisque Last(Parent(P)) ? ? ele , nous avons déjà prouvé que C/Parent(P)[E ? ] ? (C, X[ E]) +

. Démonstration, Nous allons d'abord prouver que l'algorithme termine, ensuite prouver qu'il est correct et enfin prouver qu'il est complet. Pour plus de simplicité, nous allons omettre le contexte c'est à dire écrire

C. Terminaison:-l-'algorithme-termine-parce-que-ip-est-fini-et-comme, X (i) est un sousensemble de IP, nous allons atteindre la valeur j pour i telle que X (j) = X (j+1) Par conséquent nous avons la garantie que la boucle termine et l'ensemble X (j) est retourné par l'algorithme. Nous allons maintenant prouver que X + est égal à X (j)

?. Cas-de-base, A la ligne 5 de l'Algorithme 2, l'ensemble X (0) contient des chemins P qui sont dans S, ou T, ou V ou W. 1

P. Sinon-si, . Att, Q. [. Il-existe-un-chemin, Q. Tel-que, and . Parent, Comme nous en appliquant l'axiome A6 (Unicité de l'attribut)

P. [. Sinon-si, Comme nous avons X[ E] ? P[N], en appliquant l'axiome A9 (De l'identité de noeud à l'égalité par valeur) nous avons P

P. Sinon-si-le-chemin, est dans Y alors il existe une XFD f dans F telle que l'une des conditions (a)-(b) de la ligne 7 soit satisfaite, Lorsque nous posons Z =, issue.1 1