. Baltag, and show that the BMS-axioms are EDL-valid, and that the BMS-inference rules preserve EDL-validity. As the inference rules of BMS and EDL are identical (i.e. modus ponens and necessitation) it is clear that the BMS-inference rules preserve EDL-theoremhood. It is straightforward to show that every instance of the BMSaxioms not involving dynamic operators is EDL-valid. So what remains is to prove that the BMS schemas R1, PROOF. We take advantage of the complete axiomatization of BMS-validities given in, p.2, 1998.

M. Suppose, |. Edl-b-j?, ?. .. , M. , and |. Edl-¬, The latter implies that there are worlds v and v ? such that wR a vR j v ? and M, v ? |= EDL ¬?. By the constraint nf

R. Bibliography and . Adams, Ernest Adams. The Logic of Conditionals, volume 86 of Synthese Library, p.94, 1975.

. Alchourr´alchourrón, Abstract, The Journal of Symbolic Logic, vol.48, issue.02, pp.510-530, 1985.
DOI : 10.1080/00048408412341331

A. , C. , L. Costa, and I. Levi, Two notions of epistemic validity (epistemic models for Ramsey's conditionals), Synthese, vol.109, pp.217-262, 1996.

H. Aucher, A. Aucher, and . Herzig, From DEL to EDL: Exploring the Power of Converse Events, European Conference on Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty (ECSQARU), pp.199-209, 2007.
DOI : 10.1007/978-1-4020-5839-4

URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/inria-00556150

]. Aucher, Internal models and private multi-agent belief revision, Proceedings of Autonomous Agents and Multi-agent Systems, pp.721-727, 2004.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/inria-00556084

]. Aucher, Interpreting an action from what we perceive and what we expect, Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics, vol.12, issue.4, pp.9-38, 2007.
DOI : 10.3166/jancl.17.9-38

URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/inria-00556151

]. Aumann, Agreeing to Disagree, The Annals of Statistics, vol.4, issue.6, pp.1236-1239, 1976.
DOI : 10.1214/aos/1176343654

]. Aumann, Game theory, Game Theory, pp.1-54, 1977.

. Bacchus, Reasoning about noisy sensors and effectors in the situation calculus, Artificial Intelligence, vol.111, issue.1-2, pp.171-208, 1999.
DOI : 10.1016/S0004-3702(99)00031-4

. Balbiani and . Herzig, Talkin'bout Kripke models, International Workshop on Hybrid Logic, p.78, 2007.

. Balbiani, What can we achieve by arbitrary announcements? A dynamic take on Fitch's knowability, Theoretical Aspects of Rationality and Knowledge (TARK), pp.42-51, 2007.

A. Baltag and L. Moss, Logics for Epistemic Programs, Synthese, vol.139, issue.2, pp.165-224, 2004.
DOI : 10.1023/B:SYNT.0000024912.56773.5e

. Baltag, The Logic of Public Announcements, Common Knowledge, and Private Suspicions, Proceedings of the 7th conference on theoretical aspects of rationality and knowledge (TARK98), pp.43-56, 1998.
DOI : 10.1007/978-3-319-20451-2_38

. Baltag, Alexandru Baltag, Larry Moss, and Slawomir Solecki. The logic of public announcements, common knowledge and private suspicions, p.55, 1999.

B. Battigalli, G. Battigalli, and . Bonanno, Recent results on belief, knowledge and the epistemic foundations of game theory, Research in Economics, vol.53, issue.2, pp.149-225, 1999.
DOI : 10.1006/reec.1999.0187

. Ben-naim, Jonathan Ben-Naim. Lack of finite characterizations for the distancebased revision, Proceedings of Knowledge Representation, pp.239-248, 2006.

. Benferhat, A practical approach to revising prioritized knowledge bases, 1999 Third International Conference on Knowledge-Based Intelligent Information Engineering Systems. Proceedings (Cat. No.99TH8410), pp.105-130, 2002.
DOI : 10.1109/KES.1999.820146

. Blackburn, Modal Logic, volume 53 of Cambridge Tracts in Computer Science, pp.12-14, 2001.

. Blume, Lexicographic Probabilities and Choice Under Uncertainty, Econometrica, vol.59, issue.1, pp.61-79, 0115.
DOI : 10.2307/2938240

]. Boh, Epistemic Logic in the later Middle Ages, Routledge, issue.5, 1993.

G. Bonanno, On the Logic of Common Belief, Mathematical Logic Quarterly, vol.60, issue.1, pp.305-311, 1996.
DOI : 10.1002/malq.19960420126

. Booth, R. Nittka, A. Booth, and . Nittka, A method for reasoning about other agents' beliefs from observations, Texts in Logic and Games, p.18, 2007.

. Booth, R. Nittka, A. Booth, and . Nittka, Reconstructing an Agent's Epistemic State from Observations about its Beliefs and Non-beliefs, Journal of Logic and Computation, vol.18, issue.5, p.18, 2007.
DOI : 10.1093/logcom/exm091

. Boutilier, Belief revision with unreliable observations, Proceedings of the Fifteenth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp.127-134, 1998.

]. Cantwell, A Formal Model of Multi-Agent Belief-Interaction, Journal of Logic, Language and Information, vol.25, issue.4, pp.397-422, 2005.
DOI : 10.1007/s10849-005-4019-8

N. Castã, Hintikka Jaakko. Knowledge and belief. An introduction to the logic of the two notions. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, N.Y., 1962, x + 179 pp., The Journal of Symbolic Logic, vol.29, issue.03, pp.132-134, 1964.
DOI : 10.2307/2271621

P. Chopra, Samir Chopra and Rohit Parikh. An inconsistency tolerant model for belief representation and belief revision, Proceedings of the 16th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI), pp.192-199, 1999.

L. Cohen, H. Philip-cohen, and . Levesque, Intention is choice with commitment, Artificial Intelligence, vol.42, issue.2-3, pp.213-261, 1990.
DOI : 10.1016/0004-3702(90)90055-5

T. Cover, Thomas Cover and Joy Thomas. Elements of Information Theory, 1991.

P. Darwiche, On the logic of iterated belief revision, Artificial Intelligence, vol.89, issue.1-2, pp.1-29, 1997.
DOI : 10.1016/S0004-3702(96)00038-0

L. De, Tiago de Lima. Optimal Methods for Reasoning About Actions and Plans in Multi-agent Systems, p.130, 2007.

F. Dubois, Didier Dubois andHéì ene Fargier. A unified framework for order-of-magnitude confidence relation, Twentieth Conference in Artificial Intelligence, pp.138-145, 2004.

P. Dubois, Didier Dubois and Henri Prade Possibilistic logic, preferential model and related issue, Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI), pp.419-425, 1991.

N. Ho and . Duc, Resource-Bounded Reasoning about Knowledge, p.32, 2001.

H. Fagin, J. Fagin, and . Halpern, Belief, awareness, and limited reasoning, Artificial Intelligence, vol.34, issue.1, pp.39-76, 1988.
DOI : 10.1016/0004-3702(87)90003-8

H. Fagin, J. Fagin, and . Halpern, Reasoning about knowledge and probability, Journal of the ACM, vol.41, issue.2, pp.340-367, 1994.
DOI : 10.1145/174652.174658

URL : http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.40.8779

. Fagin, Reasoning about knowledge, pp.17-112, 1995.

R. Gärdenfors, H. Gärdenfors, and . Rott, Handbook of Logic in Artificial Intelligence and Logic Programming Epistemic and temporal reasoning, chapter Belief Revision, pp.35-132, 1995.

G. Peter, Knowledge in Flux (Modeling the Dynamics of Epistemic States, pp.58-59, 1988.

R. Georgeff, A. Georgeff, and . Rao, Asymmetry thesis and sideeffect problems in linear time and branching time intention logics, Proceedings of the Twelfth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI-91), pp.498-504, 1991.

G. Gerbrandy, W. Gerbrandy, and . Groeneveld, Reasoning about information change, Journal of Logic, Language and Information, vol.6, issue.2, pp.147-196, 1997.
DOI : 10.1023/A:1008222603071

]. Gerbrandy, Bisimulation on Planet Kripke. ILLC dissertation series, p.35, 1999.

E. Gettier, Is justified true belief knowledge? Analysis, pp.121-123, 1963.

G. Adam, Two modellings for theory change, Journal of Philosophical Logic, vol.17, issue.57, pp.157-170, 1988.

M. Halpern, Joseph Halpern and Yoram Moses. A guide to completeness and complexity for modal logics of knowledge and belief, Artificial Intelligence, vol.54, pp.311-379, 1992.

]. Halpern, Reasoning about Uncertainty, 2003.

. Harel, Dynamic Logic, p.127, 2000.

M. Heifetz, Probability Logic for Type Spaces, Games and Economic Behavior, vol.35, issue.1-2, pp.31-53, 2001.
DOI : 10.1006/game.1999.0788

. Herzig, Dominique Longin, and Thomas Polacsek . A logic for planning under partial observability, AAAI/IAAI, pp.768-773, 2000.

. Herzig, Revision and update in multiagent belief structures, 5th Conference on Logic and the Foundations of Game and Decision Theory (LOFT6), p.56, 2004.

M. Katsuno, A. Katsuno, and . Mendelzon, On the difference between updating a knowledge base and revising it, Proceedings of Knowledge Representation, pp.387-394, 1991.
DOI : 10.1017/CBO9780511526664.007

K. Hirofumi and A. Mendelzon, Propositional knowledge base revision and minimal change, Artificial Intelligence, vol.52, issue.72, pp.263-294, 1992.

]. Keisler, Elementary Calculus: an Approach Using Infinites- imals, 1986.

]. Kooi, Probabilistic dynamic epistemic logic, Journal of Logic, Language and Information, vol.12, issue.4, pp.381-408, 2003.
DOI : 10.1023/A:1025050800836

]. Kooi, Expressivity and completeness for public update logics via reduction axioms, Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics, vol.1, issue.2, pp.231-253, 2007.
DOI : 10.1017/CBO9780511569852

URL : http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.495.7754

L. Kraus, Knowledge, belief and time, Theoretical Computer Science, vol.58, issue.1-3, pp.155-174, 1988.
DOI : 10.1016/0304-3975(88)90024-2

URL : http://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3975(88)90024-2

. Lehmann, Abstract, The Journal of Symbolic Logic, vol.651, issue.01, pp.295-317, 2001.
DOI : 10.1093/logcom/2.6.675

]. Lehmann, Generalized qualitative probability: Savage revisited, Twelfth Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, pp.381-388, 1996.

P. Lehrer, T. Lehrer, and . Paxson, Knowledge: Undefeated Justified True Belief, The Journal of Philosophy, vol.66, issue.8, pp.225-237, 1969.
DOI : 10.2307/2024435

]. Levesque, A logic of implicit and explicit knowledge, AAAI-84, pp.198-202, 1984.

V. Li, P. Li, and . Vitányi, An introduction to Kolmogorov complexity and its applications. Graduate texts in computer science, 1993.

M. Lismont, On the logic of common belief and common knowledge, Theory and Decision, vol.42, issue.1, pp.75-106, 1994.
DOI : 10.1007/BF01079206

C. Lorini, Emiliano Lorini and Cristiano Castelfranchi. The cognitive structure of surprise: looking for basic principles, Topoi: An International Review of Philosophy, vol.26, issue.1, pp.133-149, 2007.

]. Lycan, Epistemology Futures, chapter On the Gettier Problem Problem, pp.148-168, 2006.

V. Meyer, . Ch, W. Meyer, and . Van-der-hoek, Epistemic Logic for AI and Computer Science, p.5, 1995.
DOI : 10.1017/CBO9780511569852

. Meyer, Refined epistemic entrenchment, Journal of Logic, Language and Information, vol.9, issue.2, pp.237-259, 2000.
DOI : 10.1023/A:1008316802976

. Meyer, Rogier van Eijk, Koen Hindriks, and Wiebe van der Hoek. On programming KARO agents, Logic Journal of the IGPL, vol.9, issue.2, p.19, 2001.

R. Parikh, Rohit Parikh and Ramaswamy Ramanujam. A knowledge based semantics of messages, Journal of Logic, Language and Information, vol.12, issue.4, pp.453-467, 2003.
DOI : 10.1023/A:1025007018583

. Plaza, Logics of public communcations, Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Methodologies for Intelligent Systems, pp.201-216, 1989.

]. Pratt, Semantical considerations on floyd-hoare logic, Proceedings of the 17th IEEE Symposium on the Foundations of Computer Science, pp.109-121, 1976.

G. Rao, M. Rao, and . Georgeff, Modeling rational agents within a BDI-architecture, Proceedings of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR & R-91), pp.473-484, 1991.

D. Lavalette, R. Gerard, and . Renardel-de-lavalette, Changing Modalities, Journal of Logic and Computation, vol.14, issue.2, pp.251-275, 2004.
DOI : 10.1093/logcom/14.2.251

J. Ruan, Eploring the update universe, p.55, 2004.

]. Sack, Logic for update products and steps into the past, Annals of Pure and Applied Logic, vol.161, issue.12, p.140, 2007.
DOI : 10.1016/j.apal.2010.04.011

]. Sack, Temporal Languages for Epistemic Programs, Journal of Logic, Language and Information, vol.4, issue.2, pp.183-216, 2008.
DOI : 10.1007/s10849-007-9054-1

URL : http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.163.5286

H. Sahlqvist, Completeness and Correspondence in the First and Second Order Semantics for Modal Logic, Proceedings of the 3rd Scandinavian Logic Symposium 1973, number 82 in Studies in Logic, p.132, 1975.
DOI : 10.1016/S0049-237X(08)70728-6

]. Segerberg, Two Traditions in the Logic of Belief: Bringing them Together, Logic, Language and Reasoning: essays in honour of Dov Gabbay, pp.135-147, 1999.
DOI : 10.1007/978-94-011-4574-9_8

]. Spohn, A general non-probability theory of inductive reasoning, Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, vol.4, pp.149-158, 1988.

]. Stalnaker, On Logics of Knowledge and Belief, Philosophical Studies, vol.11, issue.1, pp.169-199, 2006.
DOI : 10.1007/s11098-005-4062-y

S. Steiner, T. Steiner, and . Studer, Total Public Announcements, Symposium on Logical Foundations of Computer Science (LFCS'07), pp.498-511, 2007.
DOI : 10.1007/978-3-540-72734-7_35

]. Steiner, A system for consistency preserving belief change, ESSLLI'06: Proceedings of the European Summer School in Logic, Language and Information, Workshop on Rationality and Knowledge Association for Logic, Language and Information, pp.133-144, 2006.

. Tallon, Communication among agents: a way to revise beliefs in KD45 Kripke structures???, Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics, vol.6, issue.4, pp.477-500, 2004.
DOI : 10.2307/2274239

URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00499348

K. Van-benthem, B. Van-benthem, and . Kooi, Reduction axioms for epistemic actions, AiML-2004: Advances in Modal Logic, number UMCS-04-9-1 in Technical Report Series, pp.197-211, 2004.

L. Van-benthem, F. Van-benthem, and . Liu, Diversity of agents in games, Philosophia Scientiae, vol.8, issue.2, p.139, 2004.

P. Van-benthem, E. Van-benthem, and . Pacuit, The tree of knowledge in action: Towards a common perspective, Advances in Modal Logic, pp.87-106, 2006.

. Van-benthem, Dynamic Update with Probabilities, Studia Logica, vol.204, issue.11, p.123, 2006.
DOI : 10.1007/s11225-009-9209-y

. Van-benthem, Logics of communication and change. Information and Computation, pp.1620-1662, 2006.

. Van-benthem, Merging frameworks for interaction, Proceedings of the 11th conference on Theoretical aspects of rationality and knowledge , TARK '07, pp.72-82, 2007.
DOI : 10.1145/1324249.1324262

. Van-benthem-]-johan and . Van-benthem, Semantic prallels in natural language and computation, Logic Colloquium '87, p.35, 1989.

]. Van-benthem, Conditional probability meets update logic, Journal of Logic, Language and Information, vol.12, issue.4, pp.409-421, 2003.
DOI : 10.1023/A:1025002917675

. Van-benthem-johan-van-benthem, One is a Lonely Number " : logic and communication Association for Symboloc Logic. 15 [ van der Hoek, 1993 ] Wiebe van der Hoek. Sytems for knowledge and belief, Logic Colloquium'02, pp.173-195, 1993.

D. Van, K. Hans-van-ditmarsch, and B. Kooi, The secret of my success, Synthese, vol.151, pp.201-232, 2006.

D. Van, Concurrent dynamic epistemic logic, Knowledge Contributors, pp.105-143, 2003.

D. Van, Public announcements and belief expansion, Advances in Modal Logic, pp.335-346, 2004.

D. Van, Dynamic epistemic logic with assignment, Autonomous Agents and Multi-agent Systems (AAMAS 2005), pp.141-148, 2005.

D. Van, Model checking dynamic epistemics in branching time, Formal Approaches to Multi-agent Systems, p.139, 2007.

D. Van, Dynamic Epistemic Logic, volume 337 of Synthese library, 2007.

D. Van, Hans van Ditmarsch. Knowledge Games. ILLC dissertation series DS- 2000-06, p.35, 2000.

D. Van, Hans van Ditmarsch. Descriptions of game actions, Journal of Logic, Language and Information (JoLLI), vol.11, pp.349-365, 2002.

. Van-eijck-van-eijck, Reducing dynamic epistemic logic to pdl by program transformation, p.140, 2004.

. Van-linder, Formalising Abilities and Opportunities of Agents, Fundamenta Informaticae, vol.34, issue.12, pp.53-101, 1998.
DOI : 10.1007/978-94-017-1741-0_10

]. Veltman, Defaults in update semantics, Journal of Philosophical Logic, vol.25, issue.3, pp.221-261, 1996.
DOI : 10.1007/BF00248150

. Wooldridge, Reasoning About Rational Agents, 2000.