, Scalable Uncertainty Management -7th International Conference, SUM 2013, 2013.

R. Baumann, Normal and strong expansion equivalence for argumentation frameworks, Artif. Intell, vol.193, pp.18-44, 2012.

R. Baumann and G. Brewka, Expanding argumentation frameworks: Enforcing and monotonicity results, Proc. COMMA, pp.75-86, 2010.

P. Bisquert, C. Cayrol, F. Dupin-de-saint-cyr, and M. , Enforcement in argumentation is a kind of update, pp.30-43
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01606830

G. Boella, D. M. Gabbay, A. Perotti, L. Van-der-torre, and S. Villata, Conditional labelling for abstract argumentation, TAFA, pp.232-248, 2011.

G. Boella, S. Kaci, and L. Van-der-torre, Dynamics in argumentation with single extensions: Attack refinement and the grounded extension (extended version)', in ArgMAS, pp.150-159, 2009.

R. Booth, S. Kaci, and T. Rienstra, Property-based preferences in abstract argumentation, ADT, pp.86-100, 2013.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/lirmm-00929825

R. Booth, S. Kaci, T. Rienstra, and L. Van-der-torre, A logical theory about dynamics in abstract argumentation, pp.148-161
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/lirmm-00863487

M. Caminada, Preferred semantics as socratic discussion, Proceedings of the 11th AI* IA Symposium on Artificial Intelligence, pp.209-216, 2010.

C. Cayrol, F. Dupin-de-saint-cyr, and M. , Change in abstract argumentation frameworks: Adding an argument, Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, vol.38, issue.1, pp.49-84, 2010.

S. Coste-marquis, S. Konieczny, J. Mailly, and P. Marquis, On the revision of argumentation systems: Minimal change of arguments status, Proc. TAFA, 2013.

D. Phan-minh, On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games, Artif. Intell, vol.77, issue.2, pp.321-358, 1995.

K. Inoue and C. Sakama, Abductive framework for nonmonotonic theory change, IJCAI, pp.204-210, 1995.

K. Inoue and C. Sakama, Computing extended abduction through transaction programs, Ann. Math. Artif. Intell, vol.25, issue.3-4, pp.339-367, 1999.

D. Kontarinis, E. Bonzon, N. Maudet, A. Perotti, L. Van-der-torre et al., Rewriting rules for the computation of goal-oriented changes in an argumentation system, Computational Logic in Multi-Agent Systems, pp.51-68, 2013.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00907875

B. Liao, L. Jin, and R. C. Koons, Dynamics of argumentation systems: A division-based method, Artif. Intell, vol.175, issue.11, pp.1790-1814, 2011.

S. Modgil and M. Caminada, Proof theories and algorithms for abstract argumentation frameworks', in Argumentation in Artificial Intelligence, pp.105-129, 2009.

E. Oikarinen and S. Woltran, Characterizing strong equivalence for argumentation frameworks, Artificial intelligence, vol.175, pp.14-15, 1985.

T. C. Przymusinski, The well-founded semantics coincides with the three-valued stable semantics, Fundam. Inform, vol.13, issue.4, pp.445-463, 1990.

C. Sakama, Abduction in argumentation frameworks and its use in debate games, Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Argument for Agreement and Assurance (AAA), 2013.

T. Wakaki, K. Nitta, and H. Sawamura, Computing abductive argumentation in answer set programming, Proc. ArgMAS, pp.195-215, 2009.

Y. Wu, M. Caminada, and D. M. Gabbay, Complete extensions in argumentation coincide with 3-valued stable models in logic programming, Studia Logica, vol.93, issue.2-3, pp.383-403, 2009.