Integrated Screening for Down's Syndrome Based on Tests Performed during the First and Second Trimesters, New England Journal of Medicine, vol.341, issue.7, pp.461-467, 1999. ,
DOI : 10.1056/NEJM199908123410701
Screening for Down's syndrome: effects, safety, and cost effectiveness of first and second trimester strategies Commentary: Results may not be widely applicable Authors' response, BMJ, vol.323, issue.7310, pp.423-425, 2001. ,
DOI : 10.1136/bmj.323.7310.423
The impact of maternal serum screening on the birth prevalence of Down's syndrome and the use of amniocentesis and chorionic villus sampling in South Australia, BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, vol.327, issue.12, pp.1453-1459, 2000. ,
DOI : 10.1016/0140-6736(92)93293-V
Towards informed decisions about prenatal testing: A review, Prenatal Diagnosis, vol.311, issue.13, pp.1215-1226, 1995. ,
DOI : 10.1002/pd.1970151304
Prenatal diagnosis in France, European Journal of Human Genetics, vol.5, issue.1, pp.26-31, 1997. ,
Current french practices for prenatal diagnosis of trisomy 21: a population-based study in Paris, 1992-97, Prenatal Diagnosis, vol.297, issue.12, pp.1113-1118, 1999. ,
DOI : 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0223(199912)19:12<1113::AID-PD715>3.0.CO;2-5
Prenatal screening for trisomy 21 with maternal serum markers: information for decision-making in pregnant women], J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris), vol.29, issue.5, pp.492-500, 2000. ,
Comparison of women who do and do not have amniocentesis or chorionic villus sampling, The Lancet, vol.345, issue.8951, pp.704-709, 1995. ,
DOI : 10.1016/S0140-6736(95)90872-2
Prenatal diagnosis for women aged 37 years and over: to have or not to have, Prenatal Diagnosis, vol.14, issue.10, pp.842-847, 2001. ,
DOI : 10.1002/pd.153
Socio-cultural inequities in access to prenatal diagnosis: The role of insurance coverage and regulatory policies, Prenatal Diagnosis, vol.26, issue.5, pp.313-325, 1990. ,
DOI : 10.1002/pd.1970100507
Reasons for women's non-uptake of amniocentesis, Prenatal Diagnosis, vol.11, issue.9, pp.859-864, 1994. ,
DOI : 10.1002/pd.1970140915
Racial-ethnic differences in prenatal diagnostic test use and outcomes: Preferences, socioeconomics, or patient knowledge?, Obstetrics & Gynecology, vol.87, issue.5, pp.675-682, 1996. ,
DOI : 10.1016/0029-7844(96)00017-8
Epidemiologic Study of Down Syndrome in a Racially Diverse California Population, 1989-1991, American Journal of Epidemiology, vol.145, issue.2, pp.134-147, 1997. ,
DOI : 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a009084
Ethnic differences in the impact of advanced maternal age on birth prevalence of Down syndrome, Am J Public Health, vol.90, issue.1411, pp.1778-1781, 2000. ,
pour la coordination nationale des enquêtes nationales périnatales. [Trends in main indicators of perinatal health in France between 1995 and 1998. Results from the National Perinatal Surveys], J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris), vol.30, issue.16, pp.552-564, 2001. ,
Prenatal Diagnosis and Selective Abortion: A Challenge to Practice and Policy, Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey, vol.55, issue.6 ,
DOI : 10.1097/00006254-200006000-00012
Information disclosure when screening for trisomy 21: a decisionmaking aid for pregnant women?], J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris), vol.30, issue.20 1, pp.80-84, 2001. ,
A Treatise on the Family., Population and Development Review, vol.18, issue.3, 1991. ,
DOI : 10.2307/1973663
Prenatal Care Incentives in Europe, Journal of Public Health Policy, vol.19, issue.3, pp.331-349, 1998. ,
DOI : 10.2307/3343540
A comparison of prenatal care use in the 20 ,
Mother's knowledge of screening for trisomy 21 in 1999: a survey in Paris maternity units, European Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology ,