K. Arrow, R. Solow, P. R. Portney, E. E. Leamer, R. Radner et al., Report of the NOAA panel on contingent valuation, Technical Report, vol.58, issue.10, pp.1601-1614, 1993.

I. Bateman and K. Willis, Valuing Environmental Preferences: Theory and Practice of the Contingent Valuation Method in the US, EU, and Developping Countries, 1999.
DOI : 10.1093/0199248915.001.0001

R. Carson, Three essays on contingent valuation (welfare economics, non-market goods, water quality. Ph.D dissertation, Departement of agricultural economics and resource economics, 1985.

C. Claeys-mekdade, G. Geniaux, and S. Luchini, Quelle valeur attribuer la Camargue? une perspective interdisciplinaire conomie et sociologie, La valeur conomique des hydrosystmes. Mthodes et modles d'valuation des services dlivrs, pp.137-168, 1999.

R. M. Farr, From Collective to Social Representations: Aller et Retour, Culture & Psychology, vol.4, issue.3, pp.275-296, 1998.
DOI : 10.1177/1354067X9800400301

A. Galinsky and T. Mussweiler, First offers as anchors: The role of perspective-taking and negotiator focus., Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol.81, issue.4, pp.657-669, 2001.
DOI : 10.1037/0022-3514.81.4.657

D. Green, K. Jacowitz, D. Kahneman, and D. Mcfadden, Referendum contingent valuation, anchoring, and willingness to pay for public goods, Resource and Energy Economics, vol.20, issue.2, pp.85-116, 1998.
DOI : 10.1016/S0928-7655(97)00031-6

D. Grether, Bayes Rule as a Descriptive Model: The Representativeness Heuristic, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol.95, issue.3, pp.537-557, 1980.
DOI : 10.2307/1885092

M. Hanemann and B. Kanninen, The Statistical Analysis of Discrete???Response CV Data, Valuing Environmental Preferences. Theory and Practice of the Contingent Valuation Method in the US, EU, and Developing Countries, pp.302-441, 1999.
DOI : 10.1093/0199248915.003.0011

W. Hanemann, J. Loomis, and B. Kanninen, Statistical Efficiency of Double-Bounded Dichotomous Choice Contingent Valuation, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, vol.73, issue.4, pp.1255-1623, 1991.
DOI : 10.2307/1242453

W. M. Hanemann, Some issues in continuous and discrete response contingent valuation studies, Northeastern Journal of Agricultural Economics, vol.14, pp.5-13, 1985.

J. Hausman, Contingent valuation : A critical assessment, 1993.
DOI : 10.1108/S0573-8555(1993)220

J. Herriges and J. Shogren, Starting Point Bias in Dichotomous Choice Valuation with Follow-Up Questioning, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, vol.30, issue.1, pp.112-131, 1996.
DOI : 10.1006/jeem.1996.0008

G. Hollard and S. Luchini, Théorie du choix social et représentations : analyse d'une enquête sur le tourisme vert en camargue. Working paper 99B06, Greqam, 1999.

J. Laslier, Tournament solutions and majority voting. Studies in Economic Theory, 1997.

J. A. List, Neoclassical Theory Versus Prospect Theory: Evidence from the Marketplace, Econometrica, vol.72, issue.2, pp.615-625, 2004.
DOI : 10.1111/j.1468-0262.2004.00502.x

M. Fadden, D. , and G. Leonard, Issues in the contingent valuation of environmental goods: Methodologies for data collection and analysis, Volume Contingent Valuation: a critical Assessment, pp.165-215, 1993.

R. Mitchell, T. Carson, and R. , Using Surveys to Value Public Goods: The contingent Valuation Method, Resources for the Future, 1989.

S. Moscovici, La psychanalyse, son image et son public, 1961.
DOI : 10.3917/puf.mosco.2004.01

S. Moscovici, Presenting Social Representations: A Conversation, Culture & Psychology, vol.4, issue.3, pp.371-410, 1998.
DOI : 10.1177/1354067X9800400305

S. Moscovici, Psychologie Sociale, 1998.

T. Mussweiler and F. Strack, Considering The Impossible: Explaining The Effects of Implausible Anchors, Social Cognition, vol.19, issue.2, pp.145-160, 2001.
DOI : 10.1521/soco.19.2.145.20705

F. Strack and T. Mussweiler, Resisting influence: Judgmental correction and its goals The sydney symposium of social psychology: social influence, pp.201-214, 2002.

A. Tversky and D. Kahneman, Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases, Science, vol.185, pp.124-131, 1974.

P. Vergès, Approche du noyau central: propriétés quantitatives et structurales, Structures et transformations des représentations sociales, Textes de base en Sciences Sociales, pp.233-253, 1994.

J. Viaud and C. Roland-levy, A positional and representational analysis of consumption. Households when facing debt and credit, Journal of Economic Psychology, vol.21, issue.4, pp.411-432, 2000.
DOI : 10.1016/S0167-4870(00)00011-8