Skip to Main content Skip to Navigation
New interface
Preprints, Working Papers, ...

Social Choice and Just Institutions:
New Perspectives

Abstract : It has become accepted that social choice is impossible in absence of interpersonal comparisons of well-being. This view is challenged here. Arrow obtained an impossibility theorem only by making unreasonable demands on social choice functions. With reasonable requirements, one can get very attractive possibilities and derive social preferences on the basis of non-comparable individual preferences. This new approach makes it possible to design optimal second-best institutions inspired by principles of fairness, while traditionally the analysis of optimal second-best institutions was thought to require interpersonal comparisons of well-being. In particular, this approach turns out to be especially suitable for the application of recent philosophical theories of justice formulated in terms of fairness, such as equality of resources.
Document type :
Preprints, Working Papers, ...
Complete list of metadata

https://shs.hal.science/halshs-00121378
Contributor : Marc Fleurbaey Connect in order to contact the contributor
Submitted on : Wednesday, December 20, 2006 - 2:09:33 PM
Last modification on : Saturday, June 25, 2022 - 8:46:20 PM
Long-term archiving on: : Wednesday, April 7, 2010 - 1:04:50 AM

File

Social_Choice_and_Just_Institu...
Files produced by the author(s)

Identifiers

  • HAL Id : halshs-00121378, version 1

Collections

Citation

Marc Fleurbaey. Social Choice and Just Institutions:
New Perspectives. 2006. ⟨halshs-00121378⟩

Share

Metrics

Record views

166

Files downloads

484