Comment on "Hexapod origins: monophyletic or paraphyletic?".

Abstract : Nardi et al. (Science, 21 March 2003, 1887) suggested that extant hexapods might be diphyletic based on the analysis of amino acids sequences of mitochondrial genes. However, improved phylogenetic analyses of nucleotide sequences (RY-coding) from the same genes consistently retrieve the classical hypothesis of hexapod monophyly.
Complete list of metadatas

https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/halsde-00192990
Contributor : Frederic Delsuc <>
Submitted on : Friday, November 30, 2007 - 10:50:41 AM
Last modification on : Thursday, February 7, 2019 - 2:30:25 PM
Long-term archiving on : Monday, April 12, 2010 - 5:36:04 AM

File

Delsuc-Science03_HAL.pdf
Files produced by the author(s)

Identifiers

Collections

Citation

Frédéric Delsuc, Matthew J Phillips, David Penny. Comment on "Hexapod origins: monophyletic or paraphyletic?".. Science, American Association for the Advancement of Science, 2003, 301 (5639), 1482; author reply 1482. ⟨10.1126/science.1086558⟩. ⟨halsde-00192990⟩

Share

Metrics

Record views

167

Files downloads

599