VP Ellipsis without indices

Daniel Hardt (1) , Nicholas Asher (2, 3) , Julie Hunter (2, 4)

1 CBS - Copenhagen Business School [Copenhagen]
2 IRIT-MELODI - MEthodes et ingénierie des Langues, des Ontologies et du DIscours
3 CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique
4 INUC - Institut national universitaire Champollion [Albi]

This paper compares two views on the status of indices in syntactic and logical representations: on a {\it structural view}, indices are syntactic formants on a par with node labels and phrase bracketings,and are thus a part of the logical forms that are derived from syntactic representations. On the {\it process view}, an index is not a syntactic object at all, but rather, an indication of the output of a resolution process. In this paper we argue that a recent body of data provides a clear empirical basis for distinguishing between these two views of indices. We argue that cases of sloppy VP ellipsis pose insurmountable problems for the structural view of indices, while these problems do not arise for the process view. Furthermore, we show that this resolution process is constrained by the semantics of various discourse relations.

Mots clés: Verb phrase ellipsis; Index; Dynamic binding; Discourse relations

Domaines: Intelligence artificielle [cs.AI]; Apprentissage [cs.LG]; Logique en informatique [cs.LO]; Informatique et langage [cs.CL]

Daniel Hardt, Nicholas Asher, Julie Hunter. VP Ellipsis without indices. 23rd Semantics and Linguistic Theory Conference (SALT 2013), May 2013, Santa Cruz, CA, United States. pp.236-251. ⟨hal-03669214⟩