Degrees of truth, Ill-Known sets and contradiction
Résumé
In many works dealing with knowledge representation, there is a temptation to extend the truth-set underlying a given logic with values expressing ignorance and contradiction. This is the case with partial logic and Belnap bilattice logic with respect to classical logic. This is also true in three-valued logics of rough sets. It is found again in interval-valued, and type two extensions of fuzzy sets. This paper shows that ignorance and contradiction cannot be viewed as additional truth-values nor processed in a truth-functional manner, and that doing it leads to weak or debatable uncertainty handling approaches.