Skip to Main content Skip to Navigation
Other publications

Challenges in determining causality: an ongoing critique of Bendavid et al’s “Assessing mandatory stay‐at‐home and business closure effects on the spread of COVID‐19.”

Abstract : We are happy to respond to Bendavid et al. on the matter of their paper [1] (the authors, henceforth). Given the subject matter impacts on lives across the globe, we are pleased to have the opportunity to continue this worthwhile discussion. While the authors have written a response [2] to our initial concerns [3,4,5], we feel that it falls short in a number of key ways, and thus the paper still does not propose a useful assessment of the efficacy of Non-Pharmaceutical Interventions (NPIs) against COVID-19.
Complete list of metadata

https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-03228267
Contributor : Lonni Besancon Connect in order to contact the contributor
Submitted on : Friday, May 21, 2021 - 6:13:07 AM
Last modification on : Monday, November 22, 2021 - 4:56:06 PM

File

 Restricted access
To satisfy the distribution rights of the publisher, the document is embargoed until : 2022-04-05

Please log in to resquest access to the document

Identifiers

Collections

Citation

Lonni Besançon, Gideon Meyerowitz‐katz, Emilio Zanetti Chini, Hermann Fuchs, Antoine Flahault. Challenges in determining causality: an ongoing critique of Bendavid et al’s “Assessing mandatory stay‐at‐home and business closure effects on the spread of COVID‐19.”. 2021, ⟨10.1111/eci.13599⟩. ⟨hal-03228267v2⟩

Share

Metrics

Les métriques sont temporairement indisponibles