Establishing Core Outcome Domains in Hemodialysis: Report of the Standardized Outcomes in Nephrology-Hemodialysis (SONG-HD) Consensus Workshop - Archive ouverte HAL Accéder directement au contenu
Article Dans Une Revue American Journal of Kidney Diseases Année : 2017

Establishing Core Outcome Domains in Hemodialysis: Report of the Standardized Outcomes in Nephrology-Hemodialysis (SONG-HD) Consensus Workshop

Allison Tong
  • Fonction : Auteur
Braden Manns
  • Fonction : Auteur
Brenda Hemmelgarn
  • Fonction : Auteur
David C. Wheeler
  • Fonction : Auteur
Nicole Evangelidis
  • Fonction : Auteur
Peter Tugwell
Sally Crowe
  • Fonction : Auteur
Wim van Biesen
  • Fonction : Auteur
Wolfgang C. Winkelmayer
  • Fonction : Auteur
Donal O'Donoghue
  • Fonction : Auteur
Helen Tam-Tham
  • Fonction : Auteur
Jenny I. Shen
  • Fonction : Auteur
Jule Pinter
  • Fonction : Auteur
Nicholas Larkins
  • Fonction : Auteur
Sajeda Youssouf
  • Fonction : Auteur
Sreedhar Mandayam
  • Fonction : Auteur
Angela Ju
  • Fonction : Auteur
Jonathan C. Craig
  • Fonction : Auteur

Résumé

Evidence-informed decision making in clinical care and policy in nephrology is undermined by trials that selectively report a large number of heterogeneous outcomes, many of which are not patient centered. The Standardized Outcomes in Nephrology-Hemodialysis (SONG-HD) Initiative convened an international consensus workshop on November 7, 2015, to discuss the identification and implementation of a potential core outcome set for all trials in hemodialysis. The purpose of this article is to report qualitative analyses of the workshop discussions, describing the key aspects to consider when establishing core outcomes in trials involving patients on hemodialysis therapy. Key stakeholders including 8 patients/caregivers and 47 health professionals (nephrologists, policymakers, industry, and researchers) attended the workshop. Attendees suggested that identifying core outcomes required equitable stakeholder engagement to ensure relevance across patient populations, flexibility to consider evolving priorities over time, deconstruction of language and meaning for conceptual consistency and clarity, understanding of potential overlap and associations between outcomes, and an assessment of applicability to the range of interventions in hemodialysis. For implementation, they proposed that core outcomes must have simple, inexpensive, and validated outcome measures that could be used in clinical care (quality indicators) and trials (including pragmatic trials) and endorsement by regulatory agencies. Integrating these recommendations may foster acceptance and optimize the uptake and translation of core outcomes in hemodialysis, leading to more informative research, for better treatment and improved patient outcomes.

Dates et versions

hal-03158163 , version 1 (03-03-2021)

Identifiants

Citer

Allison Tong, Braden Manns, Brenda Hemmelgarn, David C. Wheeler, Nicole Evangelidis, et al.. Establishing Core Outcome Domains in Hemodialysis: Report of the Standardized Outcomes in Nephrology-Hemodialysis (SONG-HD) Consensus Workshop. American Journal of Kidney Diseases, 2017, 69 (1), pp.97-107. ⟨10.1053/j.ajkd.2016.05.022⟩. ⟨hal-03158163⟩
21 Consultations
0 Téléchargements

Altmetric

Partager

Gmail Facebook X LinkedIn More