Skip to Main content Skip to Navigation
Journal articles

Why Liveness for Timed Automata Is Hard, and What We Can Do About It

Abstract : The reachability problem for timed automata asks if a given automaton has a run leading to an accepting state, and the liveness problem asks if the automaton has an infinite run which visits accepting states infinitely often. Both these problems are known to be Pspace-complete. We show that if P Pspace, the liveness problem is more difficult than the reachability problem; in other words we exhibit a family of automata for which solving the reachability problem with the standard algorithm is in P but solving the liveness problem is Pspace-hard. This leads us to revisit the algorithmics for the liveness problem. We propose a notion of a witness for the fact that a timed automaton violates a liveness property. We give an algorithm for computing such a witness and compare it with existing solutions. CCS Concepts: • Theory of computation → Verification by model checking.
Complete list of metadata

https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-03023737
Contributor : Igor Walukiewicz Connect in order to contact the contributor
Submitted on : Friday, November 27, 2020 - 2:47:29 PM
Last modification on : Monday, December 14, 2020 - 5:58:15 PM
Long-term archiving on: : Sunday, February 28, 2021 - 7:42:46 PM

File

ToCL-liveness-final-submission...
Files produced by the author(s)

Identifiers

Collections

`

Citation

Frédéric Herbreteau, B. Srivathsan, Tran Thanh Tung, Igor Walukiewicz. Why Liveness for Timed Automata Is Hard, and What We Can Do About It. ACM Transactions on Computational Logic, Association for Computing Machinery, 2020, ⟨10.1145/3372310⟩. ⟨hal-03023737⟩

Share

Metrics

Record views

51

Files downloads

82