Subcutaneous Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Lead Extraction First Multicenter French Experience

Nathalie Behar (1, 2) , Vincent Galand (1, 2) , Raphael P Martins (3, 1, 2) , Peggy Jacon (4) , Nicolas Badenco (5, 6) , Hugues Blangy (7) , Christine Alonso (8) , Benoît Guy-Moyat , Rim El Bouazzaoui (9) , Alain Lebon , Cédric Giraudeau , Christelle Marquié (10) , Christophe Leclercq (1, 2)

1 LTSI - Laboratoire Traitement du Signal et de l'Image
2 CIC-IT Rennes
3 CIC - Centre d'Investigation Clinique [Rennes]
4 CHUGA - Centre Hospitalier Universitaire [CHU Grenoble]
5 CHU Pitié-Salpêtrière [AP-HP]
6 ICAN - Unité de Recherche sur les Maladies Cardiovasculaires, du Métabolisme et de la Nutrition = Research Unit on Cardiovascular and Metabolic Diseases
7 CHRU Nancy - Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire de Nancy
8 Hôpital Ambroise Paré [AP-HP]
9 CHU - Hôpital Lapeyronie [Montpellier]
10 CHRU Lille - Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire [CHU Lille]

Objectives - The aim of this multicenter study was to characterize the efficacy and safety of subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (S-ICDs) lead extraction procedures. Background - S-ICDs have been developed to limit lead-related complications inherent to transvenous ICD devices. To date, no study has specifically investigated the safety and feasibility of S-ICD lead extraction procedures. Methods - Patients requiring S-ICD lead extraction between February 1, 2014, and February 28, 2019, were retrospectively included in 10 centers. The primary endpoint of the study was procedural success, defined as the removal of all the lead and lead material from the subcutaneous space. Secondary endpoints included procedural complications and the need for specific extraction tools. Results - S-ICD lead extraction procedures were performed in 32 patients (mean age 45.7 ± 13.8 years, 75.0% men, 65.6% in primary prevention). The median time from S-ICD lead implantation was 9.3 months (5.4 to 17.5 months). The primary endpoint, that is, complete removal of the material, was achieved in 96.9% of the patients, and only 1 procedural failure occurred (3.1%). Simple traction of the S-ICD lead was successful in 19 patients (59.4%), whereas 3 patients (9.4%) needed an additional incision and 9 patients (28.1%) required mechanical sheath to remove lead adhesions around the coil. No procedure-related complications occurred. Patients with successful simple traction extraction were implanted more recently (7.1 months [2.8 to 12.2 months] vs. 16.5 months [7.5 to 20.8 months]; p = 0.04) and had less prior history of sternotomy (2 [10.5%] vs. 5 [38.5%] patients; p = 0.09). Conclusions - S-ICD lead extraction is an efficient and safe procedure, but may require some specific tools like mechanical sheath, specifically when fibrotic adhesions developed around the parasternal coil.

Mots clés: lead extraction; mechanical sheath; subcutaneous ICD

Domaines: Ingénierie biomédicale

Nathalie Behar, Vincent Galand, Raphael P Martins, Peggy Jacon, Nicolas Badenco, et al.. Subcutaneous Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Lead Extraction First Multicenter French Experience. JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology, 2020, 6 (7), pp.863-870. ⟨10.1016/j.jacep.2020.04.012⟩. ⟨hal-02929476⟩