The Completed SDSS-IV Extended Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: N-body Mock Challenge for the Quasar Sample - Archive ouverte HAL Accéder directement au contenu
Article Dans Une Revue Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society Année : 2020

The Completed SDSS-IV Extended Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: N-body Mock Challenge for the Quasar Sample

Jiamin Hou
  • Fonction : Auteur
Ashley J. Ross
  • Fonction : Auteur
Shadab Alam
  • Fonction : Auteur
Jonathan Brinkmann
  • Fonction : Auteur
Kyle S. Dawson
  • Fonction : Auteur
Salman Habib
  • Fonction : Auteur
Katrin Heitmann
  • Fonction : Auteur
Jean-Paul Kneib
Brad W. Lyke
  • Fonction : Auteur
Hélion Du Mas Des Bourboux
  • Fonction : Auteur
Eva-Maria Mueller
  • Fonction : Auteur
Adam D. Myers
  • Fonction : Auteur
Will J. Percival
  • Fonction : Auteur
Graziano Rossi
  • Fonction : Auteur
Donald P. Schneider
  • Fonction : Auteur
Gong-Bo Zhao
  • Fonction : Auteur

Résumé

The growth rate and expansion history of the Universe can be measured from large galaxy redshift surveys using the Alcock–Paczynski effect. We validate the Redshift Space Distortion models used in the final analysis of the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) extended Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey (eBOSS) Data Release 16 quasar clustering sample, in configuration and Fourier space, using a series of halo occupation distribution mock catalogues generated using the OuterRim N-body simulation. We test three models on a series of non-blind mocks, in the OuterRim cosmology, and blind mocks, which have been rescaled to new cosmologies, and investigate the effects of redshift smearing and catastrophic redshifts. We find that for the non-blind mocks, the models are able to recover fσ_8 to within 3 per cent and α_∥ and α_⊥ to within 1 per cent. The scatter in the measurements is larger for the blind mocks, due to the assumption of an incorrect fiducial cosmology. From this mock challenge, we find that all three models perform well, with similar systematic errors on fσ_8, α_∥, and α_⊥ at the level of |$\sigma _{f\sigma _8}=0.013$|⁠, |$\sigma _{\alpha _\parallel }=0.012$|⁠, and |$\sigma _{\alpha _\bot }=0.008$|⁠. The systematic error on the combined consensus is |$\sigma _{f\sigma _8}=0.011$|⁠, |$\sigma _{\alpha _\parallel }=0.008$|⁠, and |$\sigma _{\alpha _\bot }=0.005$|⁠, which is used in the final DR16 analysis. For baryon acoustic oscillation fits in configuration and Fourier space, we take conservative systematic errors of |$\sigma _{\alpha _\parallel }=0.010$| and |$\sigma _{\alpha _\bot }=0.007$|⁠.

Dates et versions

hal-02922215 , version 1 (25-08-2020)

Identifiants

Citer

Alex Smith, Etienne Burtin, Jiamin Hou, Richard Neveux, Ashley J. Ross, et al.. The Completed SDSS-IV Extended Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: N-body Mock Challenge for the Quasar Sample. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 2020, 499 (1), pp.269-291. ⟨10.1093/mnras/staa2825⟩. ⟨hal-02922215⟩
46 Consultations
0 Téléchargements

Altmetric

Partager

Gmail Facebook X LinkedIn More