HAL will be down for maintenance from Friday, June 10 at 4pm through Monday, June 13 at 9am. More information
Skip to Main content Skip to Navigation
Journal articles

Legal Rule and Tribal Politics: The US Army and the Taliban in Afghanistan (2001–13)

Abstract : This article investigates the implications of two competing modes of governance, those of the US Army and the Taliban, through the lens of the relations between property, citizenship and political authority in Kunar, Afghanistan, between 2001 and 2013. To account for the political struggle in the province, the author outlines two models of governance: a political one based on mediation and conciliation, which the US Army applied; and a legal one promoting direct relations between the rulers and the ruled, upheld by the Taliban. After looking at the political dynamics in Kunar since the nineteenth century and since 2001, I argue that it is paradoxically the Taliban that placed itself in continuity with the state, while the US Army played tribal politics and undermined the legitimacy of the regime it had helped to install in Kabul. Kunar is a case of an armed confrontation in which different militarized groups compete to impose their rule by controlling space and access to landed property.
Document type :
Journal articles
Complete list of metadata

Contributor : Adam Baczko Connect in order to contact the contributor
Submitted on : Wednesday, February 23, 2022 - 9:07:49 AM
Last modification on : Monday, March 21, 2022 - 2:50:50 PM


Publisher files allowed on an open archive




Adam Baczko. Legal Rule and Tribal Politics: The US Army and the Taliban in Afghanistan (2001–13). Development and Change, Wiley, 2016, 47 (6), pp.1412 - 1433. ⟨10.1111/dech.12276⟩. ⟨hal-02916976⟩



Record views


Files downloads