Skip to Main content Skip to Navigation
Conference papers

Similarity Measures between Arguments Revisited

Abstract : Recently, the notion of similarity between arguments, namely those built using propositional logic, has been investigated and several similarity measures have been defined. This paper shows that those measures may lead to inaccurate results when arguments are not concise, i.e., their supports contain information that is useless for inferring their conclusions. For circumventing this limitation, we start by refining arguments for making them concise. Then, we propose two families of similarity measures that extend existing ones and that deal with concise arguments.
Document type :
Conference papers
Complete list of metadatas

Cited literature [18 references]  Display  Hide  Download

https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02886232
Contributor : Open Archive Toulouse Archive Ouverte (oatao) <>
Submitted on : Wednesday, July 1, 2020 - 1:11:50 PM
Last modification on : Tuesday, July 7, 2020 - 3:43:19 AM
Long-term archiving on: : Wednesday, September 23, 2020 - 3:57:51 PM

File

amgoud_26229.pdf
Files produced by the author(s)

Identifiers

Citation

Leïla Amgoud, Victor David, Dragan Doder. Similarity Measures between Arguments Revisited. ECSQARU 2019: European Conference on Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty, Sep 2019, Belgrade, Serbia. pp.3-13, ⟨10.1007/978-3-030-29765-7_1⟩. ⟨hal-02886232⟩

Share

Metrics

Record views

19

Files downloads

44