Skip to Main content Skip to Navigation
Journal articles

Logical theories and abstract argumentation: A survey of existing works

Abstract : In 1995, in his seminal paper introducing the abstract argumentation framework, Dung has also established the first relationship between this framework and a logical framework (in this case: logic programming). Since that time, a lot of work have pursued this path, proposing different definitions, uses and exhibiting distinct relationships between argumentation and logic. In this paper, we present a survey of existing works about this topic and more especially those that address the following question: “How logic has been used for capturing various aspects or parts of Dung’s argumentation”. This survey covers many different approaches but is not intended to be totally exhaustive due to the huge quantity of papers in this scope. Moreover, due to the fact that each approach has its own specificities, sometimes antagonistic with the other approaches, and is also justified by its own context of definition or use, the aim of this survey is not to identify one approach as being better than another.
Document type :
Journal articles
Complete list of metadata

Cited literature [96 references]  Display  Hide  Download

https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02875289
Contributor : Marie-Christine Lagasquie-Schiex Connect in order to contact the contributor
Submitted on : Wednesday, July 1, 2020 - 12:30:28 PM
Last modification on : Wednesday, October 27, 2021 - 7:27:43 AM
Long-term archiving on: : Friday, October 2, 2020 - 5:25:27 PM

File

besnard_26425.pdf
Files produced by the author(s)

Identifiers

`

Citation

Philippe Besnard, Claudette Cayrol, Marie-Christine Lagasquie-Schiex. Logical theories and abstract argumentation: A survey of existing works. Argument and Computation, Taylor & Francis, 2020, 11 (1-2), pp.41-102. ⟨10.3233/AAC-190476⟩. ⟨hal-02875289⟩

Share

Metrics

Record views

82

Files downloads

200