C. Morton, R. M. Szeimies, and A. Sidoroff, European Dermatology Forum Guidelines on topical photodynamic therapy, Eur J Dermatol, vol.25, issue.4, pp.296-311, 2015.

S. R. Wiegell, Update on photodynamic treatment for actinic keratosis, Curr Probl Dermatol, vol.46, pp.122-130, 2015.

D. Pariser, R. Loss, and M. Jarratt, Topical methyl-aminolevulinate photodynamic therapy using red lightemitting diode light for treatment of multiple actinic keratoses: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, J Am Acad Dermatol, vol.59, issue.4, pp.569-76, 2008.

R. M. Szeimies, R. T. Matheson, and S. A. Davis, Topical methyl aminolevulinate photodynamic therapy using red light-emitting diode light for multiple actinic keratoses: a randomized study, Dermatol Surg, vol.35, issue.4, pp.586-92, 2009.

S. R. Wiegell, M. Haedersdal, and P. A. Philipsen, Continuous activation of PpIX by daylight is as effective as and less painful than conventional photodynamic therapy for actinic keratoses; a randomized, controlled, single-blinded study, Br J Dermatol, vol.158, issue.4, pp.740-746, 2008.

P. Gholam, I. Bosselmann, and A. H. Enk, Low irradiance compared with conventional photodynamic therapy in the treatment of actinic keratoses, Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed, 2018.

C. Vicentini, A. S. Vignion-dewalle, and E. Thecua, Photodynamic therapy for actinic keratosis of the forehead and scalp: a randomized, controlled, phase II clinical study evaluating the noninferiority of a new protocol involving irradiation with a light-emitting, fabric-based device (the Flexitheralight protocol) compared with the conventional protocol involving irradiation with the Aktilite CL 128 lamp, Br J Dermatol, 2018.

S. Mordon, A. S. Vignion-dewalle, and H. Abi-rached, The conventional protocol versus a protocol including illumination with a fabric-based biophotonic device (the Phosistos protocol) in photodynamic therapy for actinic keratosis: a randomized, controlled, non-inferiority clinical study, Br J Dermatol, 2019.

F. Lecomte, A. S. Vignion-dewalle, and C. Vicentini, Evaluating the Noninferiority of a New Photodynamic Therapy (Flexitheralight) Compared With Conventional Treatment for Actinic Keratosis: Protocol for a Phase 2 Study, JMIR Res Protoc, vol.8, issue.4, p.11530, 2019.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02524558

Z. Apalla, E. Sotiriou, and D. Panagiotidou, The impact of different fluence rates on pain and clinical outcome in patients with actinic keratoses treated with photodynamic therapy, Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed, vol.27, issue.4, pp.181-186, 2011.

S. R. Wiegell, J. Skiveren, and P. A. Philipsen, Pain during photodynamic therapy is associated with protoporphyrin IX fluorescence and fluence rate, Br J Dermatol, vol.158, issue.4, pp.727-760, 2008.

C. Vicentini, A. S. Vignion-dewalle, and E. Thecua, Photodynamic therapy for actinic keratosis of the forehead and scalp with the Aktilite CL 128: Is there a cut-off value for PpIX-weighted irradiance for effective treatment?, Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed, 2019.