J. W. Archie, Homoplasy excess ratios: New indices for measuring levels of homoplasy in phylogenetic systematics and a critique of the consistency index, Systematic Zoology, vol.38, pp.253-269, 1989.

J. W. Archie, Measures of homoplasy. Homoplasy: the resurrence of similarity in evolution, pp.153-188, 1996.

N. Cao, , 2007.

N. Cao, A hierarchical representation of the hypothesis of homology, Geodiversitas, vol.29, issue.1, pp.5-15, 2007.

M. C. De-pinna, Ontogeny, rooting and polarity. Models in phylogeny reconstruction, The Systematics Association, pp.157-172, 1994.

J. S. Farris, A successive approximations approach to character weighting, Systematic Zoology, vol.18, pp.374-385, 1969.

J. S. Farris, The retention index and the rescaled consistency index, Cladistics, vol.5, pp.417-419, 1989.

W. M. Fitch, Distinguishing homologous from analogous proteins, Systematic Zoology, vol.19, pp.99-113, 1970.

W. Hennig, Phylogenetic systematics, 1966.

A. G. Kluge, Three-taxon transformation in phylogenetic inference: ambiguity and distortion as regards explanatory power, Cladistics, vol.9, pp.246-259, 1993.

D. R. Maddison, Missing data versus missing characters in phylogenetic analysis, Systematic Biology, vol.42, pp.576-581, 1993.

G. Nelson and P. Y. Ladiges, Information content and fractional weight of three-item statements, Systematic Biology, vol.41, issue.4, pp.490-494, 1992.

G. J. Nelson, Homology and Systematics. The hierarchical basis of comparative biology, pp.101-149, 1994.

G. J. Nelson and P. Y. Ladiges, Paralogy in Cladistic Biogeography and Analysis of Paralogy-Free Subtrees, American Museum Novitates, vol.3167, pp.1-58, 1996.

R. Owen, Lectures on the comparative anatomy and physiology of the invertebrate animals, delivered at the Royal College of Surgeons in 1843, 1843.

N. I. Platnick, Character optimization and weighting: differences between the standard and threetaxon approaches to phylogenetic inference, Cladistics, vol.9, pp.267-272, 1993.

S. Prin, The relational view of phylogenetic hypotheses and what it tells us on the phylogeny/classifi cation relation problem. The Future of Phylogenetic Systematics: The Legacy of Willi, The Systematics Association Special volume series, vol.86, pp.431-468, 2016.

R. Zaragüeta-bagils and E. Bourdon, Three-item analysis: Hierarchical representation and treatment of missing and inapplicable data, Comptes Rendus Palevol, 2007.

Z. Bagils and R. , LisBeth: New cladistics for phylogenetics and biogeography, Comptes Rendus Palevol, vol.11, pp.563-566, 2012.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02612813

J. W. Archie, Measures of homoplasy. Homoplasy: the resurrence of similarity in evolution, pp.153-188, 1996.

N. Cao, Ducasse L & Zaragueta Bagils R. 2005 NELSON05. Publié par les auteurs

M. C. De-pinna, Ontogeny, rooting and polarity, Models in phylogeny reconstruction. The Systematics Association / Clarendon Press, pp.157-172, 1994.

S. Prin, The relational view of phylogenetic hypotheses and what it tells us on the phylogeny/classifi cation relation problem. The Future of Phylogenetic Systematics: The Legacy of Willi, The Systematics Association Special volume series, vol.86, pp.431-468, 2016.

R. Zaragüeta-bagils and E. Bourdon, Three-item analysis: Hierarchical representation and treatment of missing and inapplicable data, Comptes Rendus Palevol, vol.6, pp.527-534, 2007.