R. G. Glogau, The risk of progression to invasive disease, J Am Acad Dermatol, vol.42, issue.1, pp.23-24, 2000.

E. Stockfleth, C. Ferrandiz, J. J. Grob, I. Leigh, H. Pehamberger et al., European Skin A: Development of a treatment algorithm for actinic keratoses: a European Consensus, Eur J Dermatol, vol.18, issue.6, pp.651-659, 2008.

K. Plaetzer, B. Krammer, J. Berlanda, F. Berr, and T. Kiesslich, Photophysics and photochemistry of photodynamic therapy: fundamental aspects, Lasers Med Sci, vol.24, issue.2, pp.259-268, 2009.

L. R. Braathen, R. M. Szeimies, N. Basset-seguin, R. Bissonnette, P. Foley et al., International Society for Photodynamic Therapy in D: Guidelines on the use of photodynamic therapy for nonmelanoma skin cancer: an international consensus. International Society for Photodynamic Therapy in Dermatology, J Am Acad Dermatol, vol.56, issue.1, pp.125-143, 2005.

M. B. Ericson, A. M. Wennberg, and O. Larko, Review of photodynamic therapy in actinic keratosis and basal cell carcinoma, Ther Clin Risk Manag, vol.4, issue.1, pp.1-9, 2008.

C. A. Morton, K. E. Mckenna, and L. E. Rhodes, British Association of Dermatologists Therapy G, Audit S, the British Photodermatology G: Guidelines for topical photodynamic therapy: update, Br J Dermatol, vol.159, issue.6, pp.1245-1266, 2008.

C. Morton, R. M. Szeimies, A. Sidoroff, A. M. Wennberg, N. Basset-seguin et al., European Dermatology Forum Guidelines on topical photodynamic therapy, Eur J Dermatol, vol.25, issue.4, pp.296-311, 2015.

S. R. Wiegell, Update on photodynamic treatment for actinic keratosis, Curr Probl Dermatol, vol.46, pp.122-128, 2015.

C. Morton, S. Campbell, G. Gupta, S. Keohane, J. Lear et al., Intraindividual, right-left comparison of topical methyl aminolaevulinatephotodynamic therapy and cryotherapy in subjects with actinic keratoses: a multicentre, randomized controlled study, Br J Dermatol, vol.155, issue.5, pp.1029-1036, 2006.

D. Pariser, R. Loss, M. Jarratt, W. Abramovits, J. Spencer et al., Topical methyl-aminolevulinate photodynamic therapy using red light-emitting diode light for treatment of multiple actinic keratoses: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, J Am Acad Dermatol, vol.59, issue.4, pp.569-576, 2008.

R. M. Szeimies, R. T. Matheson, S. A. Davis, A. C. Bhatia, Y. Frambach et al., Topical methyl aminolevulinate photodynamic therapy using red light-emitting diode light for multiple actinic keratoses: a randomized study, Dermatol Surg, vol.35, issue.4, pp.586-592, 2009.

J. Tyrrell, S. M. Campbell, and A. Curnow, The effect of air cooling pain relief on protoporphyrin IX photobleaching and clinical efficacy during dermatological photodynamic therapy, J Photochem Photobiol B, vol.103, issue.1, pp.1-7, 2011.

K. Z. Stangeland and S. Kroon, Cold air analgesia as pain reduction during photodynamic therapy of actinic keratoses, J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol, vol.26, issue.7, pp.849-854, 2012.

S. R. Wiegell, M. Haedersdal, P. A. Philipsen, P. Eriksen, C. D. Enk et al., Continuous activation of PpIX by daylight is as effective as and less painful than conventional photodynamic therapy for actinic keratoses; a randomized, controlled, single-blinded study, Br J Dermatol, vol.158, issue.4, pp.740-746, 2008.

S. R. Wiegell, M. Haedersdal, P. Eriksen, and H. C. Wulf, Photodynamic therapy of actinic keratoses with 8% and 16% methyl aminolaevulinate and home-based daylight exposure: a doubleblinded randomized clinical trial, Br J Dermatol, vol.160, issue.6, pp.1308-1314, 2009.

S. R. Wiegell, S. Fabricius, I. M. Stender, B. Berne, S. Kroon et al., A randomized, multicentre study of directed daylight exposure times of 1(1/2) vs. 2(1/2) h in daylight-mediated photodynamic therapy with methyl aminolaevulinate in patients with multiple thin actinic keratoses of the face and scalp, Br J Dermatol, vol.164, issue.5, pp.1083-1090, 2011.

S. R. Wiegell, S. Fabricius, M. Gniadecka, I. M. Stender, B. Berne et al., Daylight-mediated photodynamic therapy of moderate to thick actinic keratoses of the face and scalp: a randomized multicentre study, Br J Dermatol, vol.2012, issue.6, pp.1327-1332

S. R. Wiegell, H. C. Wulf, R. M. Szeimies, N. Basset-seguin, R. Bissonnette et al., Daylight photodynamic therapy for actinic keratosis: an international consensus: International Society for Photodynamic Therapy in Dermatology, J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol, vol.2012, issue.6, pp.673-679

S. R. Wiegell, S. Fabricius, J. Heydenreich, C. D. Enk, S. Rosso et al., Weather conditions and daylight-mediated photodynamic therapy: protoporphyrin IXweighted daylight doses measured in six geographical locations, Br J Dermatol, vol.168, issue.1, pp.186-191, 2013.

F. Lecomte, A. S. Vignion-dewalle, C. Vicentini, E. Thecua, P. Deleporte et al., A phase II study evaluating the non-inferiority of a photodynamic therapy protocol involving the Flexitheralight device compared to the conventional protocol (the FLEXITHERALIGHT study), JMIR research, 2018.

C. Vicentini, A. S. Vignion-dewalle, E. Thecua, F. Lecomte, C. Maire et al., Photodynamic therapy for actinic keratosis of the forehead and scalp: a randomized, controlled, phase II clinical study evaluating the non-inferiority of a new protocol involving irradiation with a light-emitting, fabric-based device (the Flexitheralight protocol) compared with the conventional protocol involving irradiation with the Aktilite CL 128 lamp, Br J Dermatol, 2018.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01976836

A. S. Vignion-dewalle, G. Baert, E. Thecua, F. Lecomte, C. Vicentini et al., Comparison of 10 efficient protocols for photodynamic therapy of actinic keratosis: How relevant are effective light dose and local damage in predicting the complete response rate at 3 months?, Lasers Surg Med, vol.50, issue.5, pp.576-589, 2018.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01770441

E. A. Olsen, M. L. Abernethy, C. Kulp-shorten, J. P. Callen, S. D. Glazer et al., A double-blind, vehicle-controlled study evaluating masoprocol cream in the treatment of actinic keratoses on the head and neck, J Am Acad Dermatol, vol.24, issue.5, pp.738-743, 1991.

S. R. Wiegell, J. Skiveren, P. A. Philipsen, and H. C. Wulf, Pain during photodynamic therapy is associated with protoporphyrin IX fluorescence and fluence rate, Br J Dermatol, vol.158, issue.4, pp.727-733, 2008.

A. H. Arits, M. M. Van-de-weert, and P. J. Nelemans, Kelleners-Smeets NW: Pain during topical photodynamic therapy: uncomfortable and unpredictable, J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol, vol.24, issue.12, pp.1452-1457, 2010.

C. Serra-guillen, L. Hueso, E. Nagore, M. Vila, B. Llombart et al., Comparative study between cold air analgesia and supraorbital and supratrochlear nerve block for the management of pain during photodynamic therapy for actinic keratoses of the frontotemporal zone, Br J Dermatol, vol.161, issue.2, pp.353-356, 2009.

D. M. Rubel, L. Spelman, D. F. Murrell, J. A. See, D. Hewitt et al., Daylight photodynamic therapy with methyl aminolevulinate cream as a convenient, similarly effective, nearly painless alternative to conventional photodynamic therapy in actinic keratosis treatment: a randomized controlled trial, Br J Dermatol, vol.171, issue.5, pp.1164-1171, 2014.

C. M. Lerche, I. M. Heerfordt, J. Heydenreich, and H. C. Wulf, Alternatives to Outdoor Daylight Illumination for Photodynamic Therapy--Use of Greenhouses and Artificial Light Sources, Int J Mol Sci, vol.17, issue.3, p.309, 2016.

S. H. Ibbotson and J. Ferguson, Ambulatory photodynamic therapy using low irradiance inorganic light-emitting diodes for the treatment of non-melanoma skin cancer: an open study, Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed, vol.2012, issue.5, pp.235-239

Z. Apalla, E. Sotiriou, D. Panagiotidou, I. Lefaki, C. Goussi et al., The impact of different fluence rates on pain and clinical outcome in patients with actinic keratoses treated with photodynamic therapy, Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed, vol.27, issue.4, pp.181-185, 2011.