J. Benet, IPFS -Content Addressed, Versioned, P2P File System, 2014.

P. Bommel, N. Becu, C. L. Page, and F. Bousquet, Cormas: An Agent-Based Simulation Platform for Coupling Human Decisions with Computerized Dynamics, Simulation and Gaming in the Network Society, vol.9, pp.387-410, 2016.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-01453248

I. Toufic, A. M. Boubez, R. L. Froncioni, and . Peskin, A Prototyping Environment for Differential Equations, ACM Trans. Math. Softw, vol.18, pp.1-10, 1992.

A. Mai, T. Bui, N. Papoulias, S. Stinckwich, M. Ziane et al., The Kendrick Modelling Platform: Language Abstractions and Tools for Epidemiology, BMC Bioinformatics, vol.20, p.312, 2019.

D. Cassou, C. F. Delbecque, Y. Dubois, and T. Arloing, Documenting and Presenting with Pillar, Enterprise Pharo. Square Bracket Associates, 2015.

N. Cellier, Smalltalk Tools for Engineering and Mathematics, 2018.

A. Chi?, T. Gîrba, J. Kubelka, O. Nierstrasz, S. Reichhart et al., Moldable Tools for Object-Oriented Development, Present and Ulterior Software Engineering, pp.77-101, 2017.

, DataFrame contributors, 2019.

M. Dias, M. M. Peck, S. Ducasse, and G. Arévalo, Fuel: A Fast General Purpose Object Graph Serializer. Softw. Pract. Exper, vol.44, issue.4, pp.433-453, 2014.

. Feenk, Glamorous Toolkit, 2019.

J. Grus, 2018. I Don't like Notebooks

K. Hinsen, ActivePapers: A Platform for Publishing and Archiving Computer-Aided Research, vol.3, p.289, 1000.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01171263

,

K. Hinsen, Verifiability in Computer-Aided Research: The Role of Digital Scientific Notations at the Human-Computer Interface, PeerJ Computer Science, vol.4, 2018.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02068574

K. Hinsen, The ActivePapers Pharo Edition, 2019.

K. Hinsen, The Computational Notebook of the Future, 2019.

K. Hinsen, Leibniz Runtime Library for Pharo, 2019.

, RStudio Inc. 2016. R Markdown

T. Kluyver, B. Ragan-kelley, F. Pérez, B. Granger, M. Bussonnier et al., Jupyter Notebooks -a Publishing Format for Reproducible Computational Workflows, Positioning and Power in Academic Publishing: Players, Agents and Agendas, pp.87-90, 2016.

E. Donald and . Knuth, Literate Programming, Comput. J, vol.27, pp.97-111, 1984.

Q. Koziol and D. Robinson, , 2018.

F. Hernán, G. Morales, and . Giovambattista, BioSmalltalk: A Pure Object System and Library for, Bioinformatics. Bioinformatics, vol.29, pp.2355-2356, 2013.

A. Mueller, , 2018.

, Reasons Why Jupyter Note-Books Suck

R. L. Peskin, S. S. Walther, and A. M. Froncioni, Smalltalk -the next Generation Scientific Computing Interface?, Mathematics and Computers in Simulation, vol.31, pp.90131-90137, 1989.

J. F. Pimentel, L. Murta, V. Braganholo, and J. Freire, A Large-Scale Study about Quality and Reproducibility of Jupyter Notebooks, 2019.

K. Pomogajko, Why I Don't Like Jupyter, 2015.

, Object Profile, 2018.

D. C. Robinson, J. A. Hand, M. Buus-madsen, and K. R. Mckelvey, The Dat Project, an Open and Decentralized, Research Data Tool. Sci Data, vol.5, 2018.

E. Schulte and D. Davison, Active Documents with Org-Mode, Computing in Science & Engineering, vol.13, pp.66-73, 2011.

S. Stinckwich, Pharo Bindings for TensorFlow, 2019.

. Marijn-van-vliet, Guidelines for Data Analysis Scripts, 2019.

S. S. Walther and R. L. Peskin, Object-Oriented Visualization of Scientific Data, Journal of Visual Languages & Computing, vol.2, issue.1, pp.43-56, 1991.

Y. Xie, The First Notebook War, 2018.