H. Ashar and R. Skenes, Can Tinto's Student Departure Model Be Applied to Nontraditional Students?, Adult Education Quarterly, vol.43, issue.2, pp.90-100, 1993.

M. Barak, A. Watted, and H. Haick, Motivation to Learn in Massive Open Online Courses: Examining Aspects of Language and Social Engagement, Computers & Education, vol.94, pp.49-60, 2016.

J. P. Bean and B. S. Metzner, A Conceptual Model of Nontraditional Undergraduate Student Attrition, Review of Educational Research, vol.55, issue.4, pp.485-540, 1985.

S. Beaud and F. Weber, Guide de l'enquête de terrain, 2010.

A. Blanchet and A. Gotman, L'Entretien : L'enquête et ses méthodes (2 e édition). Paris: Armand Colin. Interactions entre utilisateurs de MOOC : appréhender la partie immergée de l, 2010.

, Distances et médiations des savoirs, vol.20, 2017.

F. Bell, Connectivism: Its Place in Theory-Informed Research and Innovation in Technology-Enabled Learning. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, p.12, 2011.

D. M. Billings, A Conceptual Model of Correspondence Course Completion, American Journal of Distance Education, vol.2, issue.2, pp.23-35, 1988.

R. Boshier, Educational Participation and Dropout: a Theoretical Model, Adult Education Quarterly, vol.23, issue.4, pp.255-282, 1973.

M. Bulger, J. Bright, and C. Cobo, The Real Component of Virtual Learning: Motivations for Face-to-Face MOOC Meetings in Developing and Industrialized Countries. Information, Communication et Society, vol.18, issue.10, pp.1200-1216, 2015.

J. Campbell, A. L. Gibbs, H. Najafi, and C. Severinski, A Comparison of Learner Intent and Behaviour in Live and Archived MOOCs. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, p.15, 2014.

P. Carré, De la motivation à la formation, L'Harmattan, 2002.

S. Carson, The OpenCourseWare Story: New England Roots, Global Reach, New England Journal of Higher Education, vol.23, issue.1, pp.30-32, 2008.

J. Champaign, K. F. Colvin, A. Liu, C. Fredericks, D. Seaton et al., Correlating Skill and Improvement in 2 MOOCs with a Student's Time on Tasks, Proceedings of the First ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale Conference, pp.11-20, 2014.

Y. Chen and P. Chen, MOOC Study Group: Facilitation Strategies, Influential Factors, and Student Perceived Gains, Computers & Education, vol.86, pp.55-70, 2015.

M. Cisel, Utilisations des MOOC, éléments de typologie. Retour sur la diversité des formes d'attrition. Manuscrit de thèse non publié. ENS Paris-Saclay, 2016.

K. F. Colvin, J. Champaign, A. Liu, Q. Zhou, C. Fredericks et al., Learning in an Introductory Physics MOOC: All Cohorts Learn Equally, Including an On-Campus Class. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, vol.15, 2014.

J. W. Creswell, Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Thousand Oaks, 2009.

J. S. Daniel, Making Sense of MOOCs: Musings in a Maze of Myth, Paradox and Possibility, Journal of Interactive Media in Education, issue.0, p.3, 2012.

J. Deboer, G. S. Stump, L. Breslow, and D. T. Seaton, Diversity in MOOC Students' Backgrounds and Behaviors in Relationship to Performance in 6.002x, Proceedings of the Sixth Learning International Networks Consortium Conference, 2013.

J. Dumazedier, Vers une civilisation du loisir, 1962.

M. Ebben and J. S. Murphy, Unpacking MOOC Scholarly Discourse: A Review of Nascent MOOC Scholarship, Learning, Media and Technology, vol.39, issue.3, pp.328-345, 2014.

E. S. Elliott and C. S. Dweck, Goals: An approach to Motivation and Achievement, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol.54, issue.1, pp.5-12, 1988.

A. Fini, The Technological Dimension of a Massive Open Online Course: The Case of the CCK08 Course Tools. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, p.10, 2009.

, Interactions entre utilisateurs de MOOC : appréhender la partie immergée de l

, Distances et médiations des savoirs, vol.20, 2017.

C. P. Fulford and S. Zhang, Perceptions of Interaction: The Critical Predictor in Distance Education, American Journal of Distance Education, vol.7, issue.3, pp.8-21, 1993.

D. R. Garrison, Researching Dropout in Distance Education, Distance Education, vol.8, issue.1, pp.95-101, 1987.

N. Gillani and R. Et-eynon, Communication Patterns in Massively Open Online Courses. The Internet and Higher Education, vol.23, pp.18-26, 2014.

J. A. Greene, C. A. Oswald, and J. Pomerantz, Predictors of Retention and Achievement in a Massive Open Online Course, American Educational Research Journal, vol.52, issue.5, pp.925-955, 2015.

N. Hood, A. Littlejohn, and C. Milligan, Context Counts: How Learners' Contexts Influence Learning in a MOOC, Computers & Education, vol.91, pp.83-91, 2015.

R. Kop and A. Hill, Connectivism: Learning Theory of the Future or Vestige of the Past? The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, vol.9, 2008.

R. Kop, The Challenges to Connectivist Learning on Open Online Networks: Learning Experiences During a Massive Open Online Course. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, vol.12, 2011.

D. Kember, A Longitudinal-Process Model of Drop-Out from Distance Education, The Journal of Higher Education, vol.60, issue.3, p.278, 1989.

W. C. Kemp, Persistance of Adult Learners in Distance Education, American Journal of Distance Education, vol.16, issue.2, pp.65-81, 2002.

R. F. Kizilcec, C. Piech, and E. Schneider, Deconstructing Disengagement: Analyzing Learner Subpopulations in Massive Open Online Courses, Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge, 2013.

R. F. Kizilcec and E. Schneider, Motivation as a Lens to Understand Online Learners, ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI), vol.22, issue.2, pp.1-24, 2015.

D. Levy, Lessons Learned from Participating in a Connectivist Massive Online Open Course (MOOC), pp.1-6, 2011.

T. R. Liyanagunawardena, A. A. Adams, and S. A. Williams, MOOCs: A Systematic Study of the Published Literature 2008-2012. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, vol.14, 2013.

C. Milligan and A. Littlejohn, Supporting Professional Learning in a Massive Open Online Course. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, p.15, 2014.

T. Phan, S. G. Mcneil, and B. R. Et-robin, Students' Patterns of Engagement and Course Performance in a Massive Open Online Course, Computers & Education, vol.95, pp.36-44, 2016.

J. E. Raffaghelli, S. Cucchiara, and D. Persico, Methodological Approaches in MOOC Research: Retracing the Myth of Proteus, British Journal of Educational Technology, vol.46, issue.3, pp.488-509, 2015.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01156416

I. Rootman, Voluntary Withdrawal from a Total Adult Socializing Organization: A Model, Sociology of Education, vol.45, issue.3, pp.258-270, 1972.

A. P. Rovai, Building Sense of Community at a Distance. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, vol.3, 2002.

A. P. Rovai, Search of Higher Persistance Rates in Distance Education Online Programs. Internet and Higher Education, vol.6, pp.1-16, 2003.

W. G. Spady, Dropouts from higher education: An interdisciplinary review and synthesis, vol.Interchange, pp.64-85, 1970.

R. Sweet, Student Dropout in Distance Education: An Application of Tinto's Model. Distance Education, vol.7, pp.201-213, 1986.

P. Terenzini and J. Mclaughlin, Studying Student Attrition and Retention, 1987.

. Muffo, A primer of institutional research, pp.20-35

S. L. Thomas, Ties That Bind: A Social Network Approach to Understanding Student Integration and Persistance, The Journal of Higher Education, vol.71, issue.5, pp.591-615, 2000.

V. Tinto, Dropout from Higher Education: A Theoretical Synthesis of Recent Research, Review of Educational Research, vol.45, issue.1, pp.89-125, 1975.

V. Tinto, Limits of Theory and Practice in Student Attrition, The Journal of Higher Education, vol.53, issue.6, pp.687-700, 1982.

V. Tinto, Leaving College: Rethinking the Causes and Cures of Student Attrition, 1987.

V. Tinto, Research and Practice of Student Retention: What Next?, Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice, vol.8, issue.1, pp.1-19, 2006.

M. E. Van-treek-timo, How Useful is Twitter for Learning in Massive Communities? An Analysis of Two MOOCs, pp.411-424, 2013.

G. Veletsianos, A. Collier, and E. Schneider, Digging Deeper into Learners' Experiences in MOOCs: Participation in Social Networks Outside of MOOCs, Notetaking and Contexts Surrounding Content Consumption, British Journal of Educational Technology, vol.46, issue.3, pp.570-587, 2015.

. La-persistance,

, nous présentons à travers l'analyse d'entretiens semi-directifs certaines des interactions qui se mettent en place entre utilisateurs de MOOC en dehors des forums de discussion du cours, à l'abri du regard des concepteurs des dispositifs. Ces interactions pourraient participer de l'intégration sociale des participants plus que ne le font celles qui se déroulent dans les forums, et contribuer, pour une partie des participants, à favoriser la persévérance au sein de la formation. Nous proposons une typologie d'interactions sur la base de la nature des relations entre utilisateurs

, Distances et médiations des savoirs, vol.20, 2017.