R. Amar, J. Eagan, and J. Stasko, Low-level components of analyEc acEvity in informaEon visualizaEon, IEEE Symposium on InformaEon VisualizaEon, 2005. INFOVIS 2005, 2005.

S. Aslan, N. Alyuz, C. Tanriover, S. E. Mete, E. Okur et al., InvesEgaEng the impact of a real-Eme, mulEmodal student engagement analyEcs technology in authenEc classrooms, Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in CompuEng Systems -CHI 19, 2019.

L. Bannon, Reimagining HCI: Toward a more human-centered perspecEve, InteracEons, vol.18, issue.4, pp.50-57, 2011.

B. Wasson and C. H. , Data literacy and use for teaching, pp.56-96, 2015.

H. Beyer and K. Holtzblak, Contextual design. InteracEons, vol.6, pp.32-42, 1999.

P. Black and D. Wiliam, Assessment and classroom learning, Assessment in EducaEon: Principles, Policy and PracEce, vol.5, issue.1, pp.7-74, 1998.

R. Bodily, J. Kay, V. Aleven, I. Jivet, D. Davis et al., Open learner models and learning analyEcs dashboards: A systemaEc review, Proceedings of the 8th InternaEonal Conference on Learning AnalyEcs & Knowledge, pp.41-50, 2018.

M. Brehmer and T. Munzner, A mulE-level typology of abstract visualizaEon tasks, IEEE TransacEons on VisualizaEon and Computer Graphics, vol.19, issue.12, pp.2376-2385, 2013.

T. Brown and C. Buabeng-andoh, Factors influencing teachers' adopEon and integraEon of informaEon and communicaEon technology into teaching: A review of the literature, InternaEonal Journal of EducaEon and Development Using InformaEon and CommunicaEon Technology (IJEDICT), vol.86, issue.6, pp.136-155, 2008.

D. Q. Campaign, What parents and teachers think about educaEon data, 2018.

J. M. Carroll and M. B. Rosson, CHAPTER 15-Design raEonale as theory, HCI models, theories, and frameworks, pp.431-461, 2003.

W. S. Cleveland and R. Mcgill, Graphical percepEon: Theory, experimentaEon, and applicaEon to the development of graphical methods, Journal of the American StaEsEcal AssociaEon, vol.79, issue.387, p.531, 1984.

R. Cober, E. Tan, J. Sloka, H. So, and K. D. Könings, Teachers as parEcipatory designers: Two case studies with technology-enhanced learning environments, InstrucEonal Science, vol.43, issue.2, pp.203-228, 2015.

P. Dourish, The appropriaEon of interacEve technologies: Some lessons from placeless documents, Computer Supported CooperaEve Work (CSCW), vol.12, issue.4, pp.465-490, 2003.

S. P. Dow, A. Glassco, J. Kass, M. Schwarz, D. L. Schwartz et al., Parallel prototyping leads to beker design results, more divergence, and increased self-efficacy, Design thinking research, pp.127-153, 2011.

V. Echeverria, R. Marenez-maldonado, R. Granda, K. Chiluiza, C. Conae et al., Driving data storytelling from learning design, Proceedings of the 8th InternaEonal Conference on Learning AnalyEcs & Knowledge, pp.131-140, 2018.

M. Ez-zaouia and E. Lavoué, EMODA: A tutor oriented mulEmodal and contextual emoEonal dashboard, Proceedings of the Seventh InternaEonal Learning AnalyEcs and#38; Knowledge Conference, pp.429-438, 2017.

S. Few, InformaEon dashboard design, 2006.

L. Flórez-arisezábal, S. Cano, C. A. Collazos, A. F. Solano, and S. Brewster, DesignABILITY: Framework for the design of accessible interacEve tools to support teaching to children with disabiliEes, Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in CompuEng Systems -CHI 19, 2019.

B. Friedman, Value-sensiEve design, InteracEons, vol.3, issue.6, pp.16-23, 1996.

X. Fu, A. Shimada, H. Ogata, Y. Taniguchi, and D. Suehiro, Real-Eme learning analyEcs for c programming language courses, Proceedings of the Seventh InternaEonal Learning AnalyEcs and#38; Knowledge Conference, pp.280-288, 2017.

A. Gruzd, C. , and N. , Designing a learning analyEcs dashboard for twiker-facilitated teaching, Proceedings of the Fith Annual ACM Conference on Learning at Scale, vol.46, pp.1-46, 2018.

K. L. Gustafson and R. M. Branch, Revisioning models of instrucEonal development, EducaEonal Technology Research and Development, vol.45, issue.3, pp.73-89, 1997.

B. Hartmann, S. R. Klemmer, M. Bernstein, L. Abdulla, B. Burr et al., ReflecEve physical prototyping through integrated design, test, and analysis, Proceedings of the 19th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Sotware and Technology -UIST 06, 2006.

J. Hartmann, A. Sutcliffe, D. Angeli, and A. , InvesEgaEng akracEveness in web user interfaces, Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in CompuEng Systems, pp.387-396, 2007.

J. Haue, Visible learning for teachers, 2012.

K. Holstein, G. Hong, M. Tegene, B. M. Mclaren, A. et al., The classroom as a dashboard: Co-designing wearable cogniEve augmentaEon for k-12 teachers, Proceedings of the 8th InternaEonal Conference on Learning AnalyEcs & Knowledge, pp.79-88, 2018.

K. Holstein, B. M. Mclaren, A. , and V. , Student learning benefits of a mixed-reality teacher awareness tool in AI-Enhanced classrooms, Lecture notes in computer science, pp.154-168, 2018.

D. H. Jonassen, Toward a design theory of problem solving, EducaEonal Technology Research and Development, vol.48, issue.4, pp.63-85, 2000.

P. A. Kirschner, Do we need teachers as designers of technology enhanced learning? InstrucEonal Science, vol.43, pp.309-322, 2015.

R. Kosara, PresentaEon-oriented visualizaEon techniques, IEEE Computer Graphics and ApplicaEons, vol.36, issue.1, pp.80-85, 2016.

H. Lam, M. Tory, and T. Munzner, Bridging from goals to tasks with design study analysis reports, IEEE TransacEons on VisualizaEon and Computer Graphics, vol.24, issue.1, pp.435-445, 2018.

P. Louridas, Design as bricolage: Anthropology meets design thinking, Design Studies, vol.20, issue.6, pp.44-45, 1999.

R. M. Maldonado, J. Kay, K. Yacef, and B. Schwendimann, An interacEve teacher's dashboard for monitoring groups in a mulE-tabletop learning environment, Intelligent tutoring systems, pp.482-492, 2012.

R. Marenez-maldonaldo, A. Pardo, N. Mirriahi, K. Yacef, J. Kay et al., LATUX: An iteraEve workflow for designing, validaEng, and deploying learning analyEcs visualizaEons, Journal of Learning AnalyEcs, vol.2, issue.3, pp.9-39, 2015.

S. Mckenney, K. , and Y. , Design methods for TEL, Technology enhanced learning, pp.37-46, 2017.

E. Millar, I. Molenaar, and C. K. Campen, How teachers and students are adjusEng to the digital classroom, Data driven approaches in digital educaEon, pp.125-138, 2013.

M. J. Muller and S. Kuhn, ParEcipatory design, Commun. ACM, vol.36, issue.6, pp.24-28, 1993.

T. Munzner, A nested model for visualizaEon design and validaEon, IEEE TransacEons on VisualizaEon and Computer Graphics, vol.15, issue.6, pp.921-928, 2009.

T. Munzner and . Peters, What: Data abstracEon, pp.20-40, 2014.

D. A. Norman, CogniEve arEfacts. Designing InteracEon: Psychology at the Human-Computer Interface, vol.1, pp.17-38, 1991.

D. A. Norman, Logic versus usage: The case for acEvity-centered design, InteracEons, vol.13, issue.6, p.45, 2006.

P. Parsons, Conceptual metaphor theory as a foundaEon for communicaEve visualizaEon design, 2018.

J. Roschelle and W. R. Penuel, Co-design of innovaEons with teachers: DefiniEon and dynamics, Proceedings of the 7th InternaEonal Conference on Learning Sciences, pp.606-612, 2006.

S. Ruiz, S. Charleer, M. Urretavizcaya, J. Klerkx, I. Fernández-castro et al., SupporEng learning by considering emoEons: Tracking and visualizaEon a case study, Proceedings of the Sixth InternaEonal Conference on Learning AnalyEcs & Knowledge, pp.254-263, 2016.

A. Sarikaya, M. Gleicher, and D. A. Szafir, Design factors for summary visualizaEon in visual analyEcs, Computer Graphics Forum, vol.37, issue.3, pp.145-156, 2018.

H. Schulz, T. Nocke, M. Heitzler, and H. Schumann, A design space of visualizaEon tasks, IEEE TransacEons on VisualizaEon and Computer Graphics, vol.19, issue.12, pp.2366-2375, 2013.

B. A. Schwendimann, M. J. Rodriguez-triana, A. Vozniuk, L. P. Prieto, M. S. Boroujeni et al., Perceiving learning at a glance: A systemaEc literature review of learning dashboard research, IEEE TransacEons on Learning Technologies, vol.10, issue.1, pp.30-41, 2017.

M. Sedlmair, M. Meyer, and T. Munzner, Design study methodology: ReflecEons from the trenches and the stacks, IEEE TransacEons on VisualizaEon and Computer Graphics, vol.18, issue.12, pp.2431-2440, 2012.

G. Sedrakyan, E. Mannens, and K. Verbert, Guiding the choice of learning dashboard visualizaEons: Linking dashboard design and data visualizaEon concepts, Journal of Computer Languages, vol.50, pp.19-38, 2019.

E. Segel and J. Heer, NarraEve visualizaEon: Telling stories with data, IEEE TransacEons on VisualizaEon and Computer Graphics, vol.16, issue.6, pp.1139-1148, 2010.

B. Shneiderman, The eyes have it: A task by data type taxonomy for informaEon visualizaEons, The crat of informaEon visualizaEon, pp.364-371, 2003.

V. S. Smith, Data dashboard as evaluaEon and research communicaEon tool, New DirecEons for EvaluaEon, issue.140, pp.21-45, 2013.

, Digital classroom market will grow at an impressive CAGR of almost 13% unEl 2020, 2016.

K. Verbert, S. Govaerts, E. Duval, J. L. Santos, F. V. Assche et al., Learning dashboards: An overview and future research opportuniEes. Personal and Ubiquitous CompuEng, 2013.

C. Vieira, P. Parsons, and V. Byrd, Visual learning analyEcs of educaEonal data: A systemaEc literature review and research agenda, Computers and EducaEon, vol.122, pp.119-135, 2018.

P. Wright and J. Mccarthy, Empathy and experience in HCI, Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in CompuEng Systems, pp.637-646, 2008.

F. Xhakaj, V. Aleven, and B. M. Mclaren, Effects of a dashboard for an intelligent tutoring system on teacher knowledge, lesson plans and class sessions, Lecture notes in computer science, pp.582-585, 2017.